3 measurements taken within a single day, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 768–781 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 15:36
779
no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:24
779
+10
6 Aug 2026, 08:19
769
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.1%
avg views ÷ 779 subscribers
Avg views / post
250
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (1 August 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
5,006
Reactions total
163
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
48
Links
58
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
163 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
97
59.5%
❤
66
40.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 هر بار که SELECT * مینویسی، شاید داری به دیتابیس ظلم میکنی!
یکی از رایجترین اشتباهاتی که حتی تو پروژههای واقعی هم دیده میشه:
SELECT * FROM users;
در نگاه اول مشکلی نداره، ولی اگه جدولت ۴۰ ستون داشته باشه و فقط اسم و ایمیل کاربر رو بخوای چی؟
در این حالت دیتابیس:
ستونهای اضافه رو از دیسک میخونه.
دادههای بیشتری از شبکه منتقل میکنه.
حافظه بیشتری مصرف میکنه.
به جاش این کار رو بکن:
SELECT name, email F…
🚀 این افزونه VS Code واقعاً نجاتدهندهست!
اسمش Error Lens هست.
تا حالا شده یه ارور توی کدت باشه، ولی متوجهش نشی چون پایین صفحه توی تب Problems مخفی شده؟
افزونه Error Lens همون لحظه ارور و هشدار رو کنار خط کد نمایش میده.
دیگه لازم نیست مدام بین فایل و پنل Problems جابهجا بشی.
مزیتهاش:
✅ نمایش ارورها داخل خود ادیتور
✅ تشخیص سریعتر باگها
✅ افزایش سرعت دیباگ
✅ پشتیبانی از اکثر زبانهای برنامهنویسی
این از او…
🧠 کدنویسی بلدی... اما کد خواندن چطور؟
یک توسعهدهنده حرفهای فقط کد نمینویسد؛ بخش بزرگی از زمانش صرف خواندن، درک و تحلیل کدهای دیگران میشود. این مقاله درباره مهارتی است که کمتر به آن توجه میشود، اما تأثیر زیادی روی رشد هر برنامهنویس دارد.
🚀 اگر روی پروژههای تیمی یا Open Source کار میکنی، این مقاله را از دست نده.
📎LINK
@CodeVerse_dev
🤯 این حلقه چرا هیچوقت تمام نمیشود؟
for (let i = 0; i != 10; i += 0.1) {
console.log(i);
}
در نگاه اول، انتظار داریم حلقه بعد از رسیدن به 10 متوقف شود.
اما اعداد اعشاری در JavaScript با دقت کامل ذخیره نمیشوند.
ممکن است مقدار i به چیزی مثل این برسد:
9.99999999999998
و هیچوقت دقیقاً برابر 10 نشود.
✅ راه بهتر:
* از شمارندههای صحیح (Integer) استفاده کن.
* یا شرط را به شکل i < 10 بنویس.
💡 یکی از رایجترین خ…
📰 پروتکل HTTP/3 چیه و چرا سایتهای مدرن به سمت آن میروند؟
اگر اخبار دنیای وب را دنبال میکنی، احتمالاً نام HTTP/3 را زیاد دیدهای.
حالا HTTP/3 چیست؟
نسخه جدید پروتکل HTTP است که بهجای TCP از QUIC (بر پایه UDP) استفاده میکند.
چه مزیتی دارد؟
✅ برقراری اتصال سریعتر
✅ عملکرد بهتر در اینترنتهای ناپایدار
✅ کاهش تأخیر (Latency)
✅ تجربه بهتر برای کاربران موبایل
چرا برای برنامهنویس مهم است؟
اگر از سرویسهایی مثل…
🚨 یه اشتباه که میتونه ساعتها وقتت رو تلف کنه!
هفته پیش موقع ریستور کردن سایت با Duplicator یه اشتباه کردم که گفتم حتماً باهاتون به اشتراک بذارم.
بعد از نصب، Duplicator خطای زیر رو داد:
wp-login.php doesn't exist
اول فکر کردم مشکل از هاست یا دسترسیهاست، ولی بعد از کلی بررسی فهمیدم اصل ماجرا چیز دیگهایه...
📦 فایل بکاپی که داشتم ناقص بود!
داخل فایل ZIP حتی فایلهای اصلی وردپرس مثل:
wp-login.php
index.php
وجو…
⚛️ اولین سیستم مدیریت کارمندان با React، بدون Backend!
گاهی برای یادگیری React نیازی به سرور یا دیتابیس نیست. این مقاله تجربه ساخت یک Employee Management System را فقط با React و Local Storage به اشتراک میگذارد و نشان میدهد چطور میتوان مفاهیم CRUD و مدیریت State را در یک پروژه واقعی تمرین کرد.
🚀 اگر در حال یادگیری React هستی، این پروژه میتواند ایده خوبی برای تمرین باشد.
🔗 LINK
@CodeVerse_dev
🛠️ابزار ModHeader؛ کنترل کامل Headerهای درخواست در مرورگر
اگر با APIها، احراز هویت (Authentication) یا تست وبسایتها سروکار دارید، ModHeader یکی از ضروریترین افزونههای کروم برای شماست.
با این افزونه میتوانید بدون تغییر کد، Headerهای درخواستهای HTTP را ویرایش، اضافه یا حذف کنید.
✨ قابلیتهای کلیدی:
✅ افزودن Headerهای سفارشی (Authorization، API Key و...)
✅ تست و دیباگ APIها بدون نیاز به تغییر کد
✅ تغییر User-A…
🤖 یه ابزار AI که قبل از Merge شدن کد، باگها رو بو میکشه!
فرض کن Pull Request ساختی و هنوز کسی Review نکرده.
ابزارهای جدید AI میتونن قبل از همتیمیهات این موارد رو بررسی کنن:
✅ احتمال ایجاد Bug
✅ مشکلات امنیتی
✅ کدهای تکراری
✅ بخشهایی که خوانایی پایینی دارن
✅ پیشنهاد برای Refactor
نکته مهم اینه که این ابزارها جای برنامهنویس رو نمیگیرن؛ فقط باعث میشن زمان Code Review کمتر بشه و باگهای ساده زودتر پیدا بشن.
…
🔥 اگه هنوز git stash رو فقط برای مخفی کردن تغییرات استفاده میکنی، نصف قابلیتهاش رو از دست دادی!
فرض کن وسط یه فیچر مهمی، ناگهان باید یه باگ فوری رو رفع کنی.
خیلیها این کارها رو میکنن:
❌ یه کامیت الکی میزنن.
❌ فایلها رو کپی میکنن.
❌ یا حتی تغییراتشون رو پاک میکنن!
در حالی که Git از قبل این مشکل رو حل کرده.
چند دستور کاربردی:
git stash push -m "Login Feature"
برای ذخیره تغییرات با اسم مشخص.
لیست تغییرات ذ…
👍7❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @codeverse_dev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 797,863 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CodeVerse | دنیای برنامه نویسان” (@codeverse_dev), 779 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/codeverse_dev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.