🧃 Do you want to buy this channel? 😎 Message me - @potentialuser
🔥1😢1

Channel
@codes_musk_empire
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,015subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002200033918 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @codes_musk_empire |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/codes_musk_empire |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 4,015 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 4,023 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 4,026 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 9 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
151 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 52 | 34.4% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 25.8% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 17.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 6.62% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 5.30% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 3.97% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 3.31% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.662% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2024 to 20 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧃 Do you want to buy this channel? 😎 Message me - @potentialuser
🔥1😢1
🔔 Rebus of the day: IGUANA #ZOO #MINING #AIRDROP
❤4👍3❤🔥1
💙 The creators of X Empire have released a new project - ZOO on the eve of the new year. 🌲 Let's start the year 2025 with the joint mining of $ZOO tokens. 💥 Expect a lot of activity in the near future! 🔗 @zoo_story_bot
👍3❤1❤🔥1
🎄 Happy new year crypto-brothers!
❤1
😂
👍3👏2🔥2
🔤🔤🔤There are 100,000 dollars.☺️☺️☺️ It's happened!🐶 Did you believe that? 👌👌👌👌 Congratulations to everyone on this event.🪙
❤🔥3🔥3👍2
Cryptocurrency "whales" 😒🐳are building up Bitcoin☺️ reserves amid price fluctuations Large bitcoin holders known as "whales" have purchased over 10,000 BTC during the recent price drop to $90,000. According to analyst Ali Martinez, referring to the information from Santiment, after these purchases, the exchange rate turned around and began to grow. At 20:15 Moscow time on November 28, bitcoin was trading around $95,1…
👍6👏3🔥2
‼️A T T E N T I O N‼️ Cryptomillionaire Justin Sun ate a banana glued to the wall, which he bought😱 at Sotheby's for $6.24 l☺️million. Thank you! Would you buy a banana for $6.24 million?🐶
😁3🗿2🤯2
Boinkers 💩💩💩is new project from partners Notcoin! 🖥 Join to project and mine $BOINKERS! 🔗 @Boinkers 🪙🪙🪙🪙
❤3👍3❤🔥2
So, ☺️Bitcoin☺️ has updated its highs again. It was at $98,300🐶. A little more and it will reach $100,000. Have you noticed that the cue ball is growing and other coins are falling? What does it mean?🎖 And I'll tell you - the altcoin sizon will appear soon. Altcoin sizon will appear. And this is not the cue ball that brought you 2X. Oh, it's going to be hot next month and in 2025.🪙🪙🪙🤑🤑🐶🎩🤑
👍4🔥2🥰2
Not bad, not bad☺️🪙
👍8❤6🔥4🥰2
I hope you didn't sell the moment of the X Empire listing?💰 who earned how much?
❤7👍4🔥2🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @codes_musk_empire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Analyst | ZOO COMBO” (@codes_musk_empire), 4,015 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/codes_musk_empire.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.