Channel
@codehalics
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,970subscribers
+91 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002803475832 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @codehalics |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/codehalics |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 3,970 | +55 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 3,915 | +36 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:50 | 3,879 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 3,879 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 25,000 |
| Reactions total | 250 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
224 reactions across 26 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 118 | 52.7% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 22.3% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 8.48% | |
| 🤯 | 13 | 5.80% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 3.57% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.79% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 1.79% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.79% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.34% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.446% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
توی کانال دوممون (کارباشه) موقعیتهای شغلیای رو منتشر میکنم که امکان ارتباط مستقیم با کارفرما رو دارن؛ یعنی آیدی تلگرام یا ایمیل برای ارسال رزومه و صحبت مستقیم وجود داره. هدفم اینه که افرادی که تعدیل شدن یا دنبال کار هستن، سریعتر وارد بازار کار بشن. تا الان بیش از ۵۰۰ فرصت شغلی داخل این کانال منتشر شده. علاوه بر اون، یک گروه هم داریم که هر موقعیت شغلی داخل تاپیک اختصاصی خودش قرار میگیره؛ بنابراین میتونید بر اسا…
❤8
توصیه میکنم به استفاده از opencode با ۵ دلار که کار سابسکریپشن ۲۰۰ یورویی کدکس رو میکنه! حالا بذارید بگم چرا این حرفو میزنه؛ شما یه ۵ دلار زحمت میکشید اشتراکش رو میخرید و در عوض، مدل جدید DeepSeek Flash رو تقریباً بهصورت نامحدود بهتون میده. بعدش دیگه دستتون بازه و هر کاری میتونید باهاش بکنید؛ میتونید با OmniRoute یا 9Router به کلادکد وصلش کنید یا حتی ببرینش روی هرمس. این نسخه جدید دیپسیک فلش بهشدت قویه و …
❤5
قبل از اینکه کلاد (Claude) یا هر ابزار هوش مصنوعی ای کدنویسی رو شروع کنه، بهترین کار اینه که با ابزار جذاب Squig شکل کلی صفحه رو مثل یک طرح دستی ساده بچینید؛ یعنی جای دقیق متنها، دکمهها و بخشهای مختلف رو مشخص کنید و همون نقشه راه رو دست کلود بسپارید تا نسخه واقعی و بینقصش رو براتون خلق کنه. https://squig.sh/ @codehalics | کدهالیک
❤4
من یه مثال بزنم بهتر متوجهش بشید برای مثال فرض کنید میخواید قابلیت دارک مود رو به پروژهتون اضافه کنید، اینجا به جای اینکه هوش مصنوعی مستقیم بره تو دل فایلها و شروع به تغییرات و آزمون و خطا کنه، اول یه سند مشخصات بهتون میده که توش نوشته قراره به طور تمیز از متغیرهای سی اس اس استفاده کنه و انتخاب کاربر رو توی حافظه محلی مرورگر نگه داره، و فقط وقتی شما این برنامه و منطق رو تایید کردید، میره دقیقا همون تسکها رو به …
❤2
اوپن اسپک در اصل یه فریمورک سبک و متنباز برای برنامهنویسهاست که به عنوان یه لایه برنامهریزی دقیق، قبل از شروع کدنویسی توسط دستیارهای هوش مصنوعی مثل کرسر یا کوپایلت وارد عمل میشه تا جلوی گیج شدن مدلها و تولید کدهای غیرقابل پیشبینی رو بگیره. روند کار اینطوریه که به جای توضیح دادن مبهم خواستهها توی چت، شما ایده خودتون رو مطرح میکنید و این ابزار قبل از نوشتن حتی یک خط کد، یه نقشه راه متنی واضح شامل نیازمندیها،…
❤2
اگه از آنتیگرویتی گوگل، نمیتونید به دلیل ریجن ایران استفاده کنید ، یه بنده خدای روسی اومده یه پچر ساخته خیلی راحت میتونید آنتیگرویتی را پچ کنین و ازش استفاده کنید ✍️ مسعود کاویانی https://github.com/AvenCores/open-antigravity-patcher پ.ن: رو یه اکانتی تستش کنین که خطر بن شدن نداشته باشه کلا ! @codehalics | کدهالیک
❤3
خروجیهای فرانتاند هوش مصنوعی معمولا خیلی جنریک و تکرارین. Taste Skill یه فریمورک اپنسورسه که مستقیم روی ابزارهایی مثل Cursor یا Claude میشینه و مجبورشون میکنه دیزاین، تایپوگرافی و انیمیشن رو اصولی بزنن. خروجیش یه UI به شدت تمیز و استاندارده که اصلا بهش نمیاد کار AI باشه. https://www.tasteskill.dev/ npx skills add Leonxlnx/taste-skill @codehalics | کدهالیک
❤6👍1
نویسنده مقاله یه مفهوم جالبی رو مطرح میکنه به اسم کارگرایی. قضیه اینه که نسلهای قبلی معنای زندگیشون رو از خانواده یا شغلهای به شدت اثرگذار مثل تدریس یا پزشکی میگرفتن. اما ما تو دنیای نرمافزار داریم تلاش میکنیم این معنا رو از تسکها و جلسات بیپایانمون بکشیم بیرون. خیلی از کارهایی که تو شرکتهای بزرگ انجام میشه در واقعیت هیچ تاثیر بزرگی تو دنیای بیرون ندارن. ما بعضی وقتا فقط داریم فیچرهایی میزنیم که کسی نخواسته، یا…
👍13
تا حالا براتون پیش اومده وسط یه پروژه سنگین یا دیباگ کردن کدها، یهو دلتون بخواد لپتاپ رو ببندید و برید سراغ یه کار کاملا فیزیکی مثل نجاری یا باغبونی؟ این حس اصلا عجیب نیست. یه مقاله خیلی جالب تو مجله Noema منتشر شده که دقیقا دست گذاشته روی همین درد مشترک. نویسنده میگه خیلی از بچههای دنیای تک این روزا درگیر یه بحران معنا شدن. کار ما به شدت انتزاعیه و خیلی وقتا هیچ خروجی فیزیکی و ملموسی نداره. به خاطر همینه که خیلیام…
👍11
طرف موبایلشو تو آفیس گم میکنه. هرچی میگرده پیدا نمیشده. به Claude میگه اونم براش یه اپ درست میکنه که با سیگنال بلوتوث پیداش میکنه. ریپو را هم گذاشته. جالبه! https://github.com/ben-z/findphone @codehalics | کدهالیک
🤯13❤3🔥1
امروز میخوام Strix رو معرفی کنم بهتون که یه ابزار اوپن سورس تست نفوذه که با چندتا عامل هوش مصنوعی اتوماتیک کار میکنه و مثل یه هکر واقعی کدت رو اجرا میکنه تا باگ پیدا کنه و با ساختن PoC واقعی هم اون رو ولید کنه ، کلیت کارش اینه که یه CLI میدی به دست دولوپر، چندتا عامل باهم ارکستر میشن، ریکان میزنن، اکسپلویت میکنن و در نهایت یه پچ آماده merge هم تحویلت میدن، ضمنا با CI/CD و گیت هاب و گیتلب و جیرا هم ست میشه که هر بار د…
❤2👍2
یه پلتفرم و ابزار خفن برای دسترسی به مدلهای مختلف هوش مصنوعی پیدا کردم که از Fable 5 گرفته تا همین دیپسیک فلش جدیده رو پشتیبانی میکنه و تا ۵۵ سشن رایگان میده. نسخه وبش تو آدرس freebuff.com در دسترسه و بچههای فنی هم میتونن با کامند npm i -g freebuff نصبش کنن. من خودم الان یک ساعته دارم بکوب با مدل فلش دیپسیک کار میکنم و هنوز سشنهام تموم نشده. جالب اینجاست که مدل gpt 5.6 رو هم داره و تازگی یه نسخه دسکتاپ هم برا…
❤11👍2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @codehalics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 8,253 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کدهالیک | codehalic” (@codehalics), 3,970 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/codehalics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.