On Metaphysics of the Russian-Ukrainian War: applying the arguments of three most influential political scientists to the conflict https://codeforrussia.org/blog/metaphysics-russia-ukraine-war

Channel
Code for Russia
@code_for_russia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001489792181 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @code_for_russia |
| Description | Сообщество IT-специалистов, создающих проекты и технологии для становления свободного демократического общества в России, стоящего на принципах гуманизма. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 20 March 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/code_for_russia |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 21 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 21 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 March 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 17
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Опубликован RFC (дизайн-документ) проекта SElector: стандартизация форм результатов выборов в системе ГАС Выборы. Цель данного проекта - предоставить технологию семантического распознавания протоколов для автоматизации и масштабирования сервисов/проектов визуализации/анализа российской электоральной статистики. Благодарим всех, кто поучаствовал в рецензировании и комментировании. 📄 Ссылка на документ: https://docs.…
Краткое содержание нашей встречи с Сергеем Власовым, юристом и муниципальным депутатом округа Печатники г. Москва. Обсудили полномочия муниципальных депутатов и идеи IT-проектов, которые можно было бы развивать на этом уровне представительной власти: 1. Полномочия муниципальных депутатов. В Печатниках - 15 мундепов. а) Есть возможности распределения очень небольшого бюджета (15 млн руб / год), из которого почти нич…
Live stream finished (1 hour)
Live stream started
🎤 Анонс встречи 🎤 В следующую пятницу 23 апреля в 20:00 по московскому времени (10am PST) проводим онлайн-встречу с Сергеем Власовым [1] - депутатом района Печатники в Москве. Площадка - голосовой чат нашего канала [2]. Обсудим полномочия муниципальных депутатов и идеи IT-проектов, которые можно было бы развивать на этом уровне представительной власти. Добавляйте Google календарь событий сообщества [3]. [1] https://…
Топ-5 самых активных* идей проектов: - Альтерэго: система альтернативного электронного голосования (https://github.com/Code-for-Russia/How-to-start/issues/10) - Поисковик по НКО для сотрудников корпораций (https://github.com/Code-for-Russia/How-to-start/issues/2) - Онлайн-платформа участия и контроля за выборами (https://github.com/Code-for-Russia/How-to-start/issues/3) - Цицеро - электронная трибуна митингов (https:…
Code for Russia pinned «Итоги нашей встречи с Павлом Мариничем и Павлом Потаповым (Zubr.in): 1) Основная цель наблюдательных проектов Zubr.in, Голос, Честные люди в Беларуси была доказать фальсификации на выборах и убедить как можно большее количество людей в том, что выборы прошли…»
Итоги нашей встречи с Павлом Мариничем и Павлом Потаповым (Zubr.in): 1) Основная цель наблюдательных проектов Zubr.in, Голос, Честные люди в Беларуси была доказать фальсификации на выборах и убедить как можно большее количество людей в том, что выборы прошли с неприемлемым количеством нарушений. 2) Особенности белорусских выборов: - кандидаты арестовывались/отстранялись от выборов даже на стадии выдвижения и сбора п…
Состоялась онлайн-встреча участников Code for Russia с экспертом - известным политологом, соавтором книги “Облачная демократия” Ф. Крашенинниковым (https://www.joinclubhouse.com/event/xXNZGwVb?fbclid=IwAR3E3swLJZ6PUtcnEdszNj8Tyf3FnM-vPB1VwCZB5dZ7qnD6yaSsYet7Jbo). Основные моменты: 1) Федор жалеет о том, что не успели развиться проекты прямого голосования в 2011-12 году, когда политическая реальность была другая. И б…
Live stream finished (1 hour)
Начали! https://t.me/code_for_russia?voicechat
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @code_for_russia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 543,814 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@code_for_russia named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Code for Russia” (@code_for_russia), 21 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/code_for_russia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.