Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for coches 🚘

Channel

coches 🚘

@coches

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,383subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001009996157
TypeChannel
Username@coches
Created31 January 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/coches

Growth

2,3832,3982,390.55 August 2026 — 2,398 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,398 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,397 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,395 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,391 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,390 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,389 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,385 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,383 subscribers5 August 202626 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,381–2,400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 06:242,383-2
23 Aug 2026, 05:242,385-4
19 Aug 2026, 14:372,389-1
16 Aug 2026, 06:482,390-1
12 Aug 2026, 22:132,391-4
9 Aug 2026, 20:372,395-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:082,397-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:372,398no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:452,398first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 4 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 2,383 subscribers
Avg views / post
339
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held12 (4 December 20241 August 2026)
Views total339
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
53s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4536.0%
👍3124.8%
👎129.60%
🔥129.60%
🤔108.00%
🤩97.20%
🏆32.40%
😎21.60%
🤬10.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2024 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @coches. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 December 2024 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 May 2026, 19:54 UTC≈3,940 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚗 GM recorta en IT: menos talento, más dudas GM despedirá entre 500 y 600 empleados de IT en todo el mundo, también en Michigan, para reorganizarse y buscar 'nuevas habilidades'. Sobre el papel suena a modernización; en la práctica, huele bastante a recorte de costes. 💻⚠️ Lo curioso es que esto llega mientras los coches dependen cada vez más del software, las pantallas, la conectividad y los sistemas propios. Justo

2🏆1

Signed garcia

8 May 2026, 20:44 UTC≈1,540 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

2

Signed garcia

8 May 2026, 13:48 UTC≈1,440 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🍿 Porsche vende Bugatti Rimac: cuando hasta los gigantes necesitan soltar lastre Me parece uno de esos movimientos que dicen mucho más de lo que aparentan. Porsche vende su 45% de Bugatti Rimac y también su 20,6% en Rimac Group justo después de que sus beneficios operativos cayeran un brutal 93% en 2025. Es una señal clara de que la marca alemana quiere volver a centrarse en su negocio principal y dejar de dispersar

1👍1

Signed garcia

11 Nov 2025, 12:04 UTC≈3,710 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚌 Noruega acaba de descubrir que sus autobuses eléctricos fabricados en China pueden apagarse a distancia. Ruter, la empresa que gestiona el transporte público de Oslo, realizó pruebas y confirmó que el fabricante chino Yutong mantiene acceso remoto al sistema eléctrico a través de la red móvil. En teoría, podría detenerlos en cualquier momento. Ahora Ruter refuerza la ciberseguridad con cortafuegos, normas más est

🤩75🤔1

14 Aug 2025, 17:00 UTC≈4,390 views9 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

5👍2🏆1🤩1

1 May 2025, 13:15 UTC≈5,200 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚗🤖 Waymo y Toyota quieren que tengas tu propio coche autónomo Waymo (Google) y Toyota acaban de unirse para llevar la conducción autónoma a vehículos particulares, no solo a taxis robotizados. La idea es clara: unir la tecnología de Waymo con los coches de Toyota para que puedas tener un coche que se conduzca solo. ¿El futuro? No pedir un robotaxi… sino tener el tuyo en casa. ¿Te subirías? 🧠💭

8👍3👎2

27 Feb 2025, 00:22 UTC≈5,970 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍10🔥5🤔41🏆1🤩1😎1

9 Jan 2025, 10:08 UTC≈6,220 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Toyota desvela la edición final del GR Supra A90, una exclusiva joya limitada a solo 300 unidades a nivel global. Este modelo especial destaca por sus frenos Brembo de mayor tamaño, una suspensión ajustable KW mejorada y un motor potenciado que alcanza los 429 CV, ofreciendo un rendimiento extremo. Para maximizar el agarre y la estabilidad, incorpora llantas de 19 pulgadas delante y 20 pulgadas detrás, calzadas con

14👍4🔥3

7 Jan 2025, 11:33 UTC≈4,950 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🏎 Sony Honda Afeela 2025: Innovación Eléctrica con 300 Millas de Autonomía y Asistencia AI Motor: Eléctrico, soporte para red Supercharger de Tesla Tracción: 4 ruedas Consumo: Hasta 480 Km de autonomía (EPA) Tecnología: 40 sensores y cámaras, asistencia de conducción semi-autónoma, asistente personal AI, integración de realidad aumentada Seguridad: 40 sensores y cámaras para conducción segura 🔋 La Afeela 1 de Sony

👍52🔥2

10 Dec 2024, 14:11 UTC≈4,220 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Tesla Model Q: El Compacto Revolucionario por Menos de 30.000 € Motor: Eléctrico, plataforma compacta Tamaño: 15% más pequeño que el Model 3 Peso: 30% más ligero que el Model 3 Autonomía: Por confirmar, optimizado para eficiencia Precio: <30.000 € (con subvenciones), ~37.500 € sin ellas Tecnología: Preparado para conducción autónoma, diseño minimalista Producción: Líneas existentes de Tesla Lanzamiento: H1 2025 Co

🤔5👍4👎41🔥1

4 Dec 2024, 11:20 UTC≈4,230 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Jaguar Type 00: el nuevo comienzo del emblema británico En la Miami Art Week, se ha presentado el Jaguar Type 00 🛠, un concept de GT eléctrico 🔌 que marca una ruptura clara con el pasado 🚀. ✨ No se puede negar que el rebranding de Jaguar está dando mucho que hablar. Primero con el nuevo logo y su campaña publicitaria provocadora, y ahora con este concept futurista. La presentación del Jaguar Type 00 👏 tuvo un so

👎63👍2🔥1🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @coches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,577,808 of 1,603,893entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“coches 🚘” (@coches), 2,383 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coches.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.