Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CM Production

Channel

CM Production

@cmproduction

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

288subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002052404125
TypeChannel
Username@cmproduction
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cmproduction

Growth

287288287.58 August 2026 — 287 subscribers8 August 2026 — 287 subscribers16 August 2026 — 288 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 287–288 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:47288+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:19287no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:45287first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 3 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5217453218082090502117100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2025 to 19 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 7 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cmproduction. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 May 2025 to 19 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Oct 2025, 14:11 UTC498 views10 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

cкорее в инст — смотреть, что мы можем сделать даже из таких исходников.

custom 521745321808209050210

21 Jul 2025, 14:25 UTC751 views16 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Тут новый рилс, а кто не посмотрит тот пожалеет...😠

custom 521745321808209050216

20 Jul 2025, 10:35 UTC635 views16 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩DBN 2🤩 Фотки давно пылятся в ящике, и причина этому... Мы просто забываем сделать пост. Но, преодолевая такие серьезные трудности, наконец мы явили их вам. Лицезрейте, второй проект для бренда Дилблина-DBN. В первом мы пытались поработать над формой, деконтаминировали обычное представление о визуале, деконструировали штампы и еще много умных слов — далее можете сами додумать. Тут всё более фастфудово. Коллекция п

custom 521745321808209050216

7 Jul 2025, 15:03 UTC556 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сделали проект для BAPE 😱, а увидеть его целиком можно в нашем инст или тик токе. Бегом смотреть, пожалуйста🥹

custom 521745321808209050215

18 Jun 2025, 10:01 UTC668 views17 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩RLV🤩 По правде говоря, это был первый проект, в котором наше видение и пожелания заказчика разошлись уже на этапе разработки. Мы, как обычно, делали ставку на наш главный козырь — пост-продакшн, но заказчик хотел использовать его по минимуму. Мы были уверены: чтобы создать по-настоящему цепляющий визуал, нужны самые зрелищные 3D-доспехи и огромные цифровые локации. Однако ребята из RLV сказали: «Вот модели, вот су

custom 521745321808209050217

1 Jun 2025, 17:10 UTC743 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩School for Drip🤩 Ждали? Даже если нет — всё равно покажем. На очереди — второй кейс для Drip collective. Идея с игрой из первого проекта уже отправилась на заслуженный покой, но всё же в каком-то смысле задала нам вектор, по которому мы продолжаем двигаться: создаём свою особенную школу — СОШ №12 с углублённым чувством прекрасного. У нас здесь — консервативные панки, улыбчивые готы и вполне обычные хулиганы. Пред

custom 521745321808209050215

3 May 2025, 12:34 UTC797 views28 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩офис🤩 Тааак, ну а что рассказывать то....Просто красиво.... Тут мы и не пытались прыгнуть выше головы, хотели просто сочно и качественно, да и в принципе, посудите сами, какой "уважающий" себя фотограф (или типо того) не имеет в своей копилке офисный сет.... дальше остаётся только циклорамная фотосессия сильной и независимой женщины с пиджаком на голое тело и можно закрывать продакшн. В общем, насколько бы заезж

custom 521745321808209050228

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @cmproduction. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 520,922 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CM Production” (@cmproduction), 288 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cmproduction.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.