Channel
@cmatn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002521202114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cmatn |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cmatn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 40 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 40 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 May 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 58 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
قسمين؛ في: (ربيع الثاني/1447هـ | سبتمبر/2025م)، إلى أن أرسلته للمخرج (الصاف) في: (14/محرم/1448هـ | 29/يونيو/2026م)، ثم دفعته للمطبعة في: (6/صفر/1448هـ | 20/يوليو/2026م). وسأتفرغ -إن شاء الله- في الأيام القادمة لاستكمال العمل على هذا الموضوع من جهة دراسة آراء الجهم بن صفوان الترمذي ومقاتل بن سليمان البلخي وتحقيق متن (الرد على الجهمية | الرد على الجهم بن صفوان الترمذي) بحسب وضع نسخ "التحرير الأول"؛ إضافة إلى أفكار بحث…
Signed د. محمد علي عطا
أخرى؛ كيف أن قضية نسبة (الرد على الزنادقة والجهمية) لابن حنبل لا يوجد ما يسوغها، سوى تقليد السابقين على خطأ وقعوا فيه! وأود أن أنبه هنا بأن هذا الكتاب الجديد، وإن كان كبير الحجم؛ إلا أنه ليس سوى "عمل أولي" كان لا بد من إنجازه من أجل التفرغ لعمل قادم -بمشيئة الله-؛ حيث إني ركزت في هذا الكتاب الجديد على بحث صحة نسبة (الرد على الزنادقة والجهمية) لابن حنبل؛ أي أني لم أقرأ هذا النص في سياقه التاريخي، ولم أتناول بحث صحة ن…
Signed د. محمد علي عطا
وقدمت الإشكالات الثانية بمقدمة تناولت فيها طبيعة المنقولات عن (الرد على الزنادقة والجهمية) بنسبتها لابن حنبل؛ لكي أبين أن عامتها، وخاصة المتقدمة منها؛ هي منقولات مرسلة وليست مروية بالإسناد، وأن التالي ينقل بواسطة السابق؛ حيث إن البعض يبالغ في تقدير قيمة هذه المنقولات وهي مجرد "قرائن خارجية" لا "أدلة داخلية"؛ لأنها لم تقع من طلاب ابن حنبل، وإنما من أناس جاؤوا بعد وقت تأليفه "المفترض" لهذا النص بما لا يقل عن مائة وثمان…
Signed د. محمد علي عطا
الحمد لله.. صدر في هذه الأيام هذا الكتاب من تأليفي، وقد تناولت فيه بحث صحة نسبة نص (الرد على الزنادقة والجهمية) الذي يُنسب، من قرابة ألف سنة؛ لأحمد بن محمد بن حنبل. وقد بينت زيف هذه النسبة، وأثبت أن هذا النص "الكلامي" لا يمكن، بأي حال من الأحوال؛ أن يكون من تأليف هذه الشخصية؛ وذلك بإظهار الإشكالات العلمية، إلا أني قد سبقت هذه الإشكالات العلمية بمعالجة القرينة الوحيدة التي قد تصحح نسبته لابن حنبل، وهي دعوى رواية أبي …
Signed د. محمد علي عطا
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed د. محمد علي عطا
سؤال للمشايخ: "كتاب تذكرة أولي البصائر في الكبائر ..." المطبوع منسوبا لابن الجوزي هل تبين من هو المؤلف الحقيقي للكتاب؟
Signed د. محمد علي عطا
File, posted without a caption
Signed د/ محمد علي عطا
File, posted without a caption
Signed د/ محمد علي عطا
المنتخب في أشعار العرب/ الثعالبي ج1+ج2
Signed د/ محمد علي عطا
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed د. محمد علي عطا
نُسب إلى الملك الأشرف الرسولي خطأ كتاب (العسجد المسبوك والزبرجد المحكوك في تاريخ دولة الإسلام وطبقات الملوك)، وطبعت قطعة منه في بغداد بتحقيق الدكتور شاكر عبد المنعم سنة ١٩٧٥م، وهو ليس له، وإنما هو للمؤرخ الخزرجي (المتوفى سنة ٨١٢ هـ)، ونشر الكتاب مؤخرا منسوبا لمؤلفه الحقيقي الخزرجي، ولم يترجم للفيروزبادي ترجمة وافيه لانه توفي قبله، ولكنه ذكره واثنى عليه في خبر قدومه إلى اليمن (2 / 769) ، وفي خبر توليه القضاء ( 2 /775)
Signed د. محمد علي عطا
صورة من د. محمد علي عطا
Signed د. محمد علي عطا
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cmatn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 792,530 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مركز تحقيق نسبة النصوص (مَتْن)” (@cmatn), 40 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cmatn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.