Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cloud.ru

Channel

Cloud.ru

@cloudruprovider

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,685subscribers

+500 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001977123101
TypeChannel
Username@cloudruprovider
DescriptionCloud․ru — ведущий провайдер облачных и AI-технологий. ⭐️ № 1 в IaaS, iKS-Consulting, 2025 ⭐️ № 1 в PaaS, iKS-Consulting, 2025 ⭐️ № 1 на рынке ИИ, CNews Analytics, 2026 Наши соцсети: https://taplink.cc/cloudru Регистрация РКН: https://clck.ru/3GqrVn
Created5 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cloudruprovider

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,18510,68510,4356 August 202612 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 98 days, net +500. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,110–10,760 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 21:5610,685+25
10 Nov 2026, 18:0710,660+22
9 Nov 2026, 07:1710,638+2
7 Nov 2026, 22:0710,636+13
5 Nov 2026, 15:1410,623-2
4 Nov 2026, 15:5010,625+2
3 Nov 2026, 18:0810,623+4
2 Nov 2026, 21:3510,619+15
1 Nov 2026, 22:4810,604+4
1 Nov 2026, 00:1710,600-1
31 Oct 2026, 00:1810,601+6
30 Oct 2026, 01:1810,595+9
29 Oct 2026, 04:3710,586-1
28 Oct 2026, 03:2610,587-1
27 Oct 2026, 05:3610,588+17
26 Oct 2026, 05:3110,571+1
25 Oct 2026, 07:4410,570+5
24 Oct 2026, 07:0010,565+10
23 Oct 2026, 03:4510,555+4
22 Oct 2026, 01:4110,551first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.0%
avg views ÷ 10,685 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,360
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held45 (20 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total40,043
Reactions total616
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 10:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,450
Videos
≈147
Links
≈706

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 16s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,538 reactions across 45 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥59038.4%
custom 523556531421266290026417.2%
👍23115.0%
custom 53999844147195190461499.69%
✍805.20%
🤩402.60%
🤝382.47%
👀342.21%
👏322.08%
custom 5237929070938858763110.715%
❤‍🔥110.715%
💯110.715%
⚡70.455%
😱70.455%
🎉60.39%
custom 523819225794482189750.325%
custom 523998859795159957040.26%
custom 540034513184284220240.26%
🤪40.26%
custom 535727142022729769530.195%
4 further kinds70.455%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,538 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 45 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cloudruprovider. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC933 views15 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

ИИ-оптимизация ➕ аналитика ➕ удобная работа с данными Evolution Data Platform — это комплекс управляемых сервисов для работы с данными на всех этапах: от валидации и структурирования до обработки, анализа и визуализации. В обновлении платформы появились ИИ-подсказки для Spark-заданий, упрощенная настройка подключений и больше возможностей для Airflow, Flink, Trino и Metastore. ➡️ Собрали главные обновления в карто…

👍5custom 53999844147195190465🔥4custom 53572714202272976951

9 Nov 2026, 14:39 UTC≈1,700 views34 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Искусственный интеллект часто описывают как нематериальную силу. Но за этой «невидимой» технологией стоят физические ресурсы — чипы, электричество, дата-центры, инженерные команды и большие инвестиции. В интервью для журнала «Сноб» Михаил Лобоцкий, генеральный директор Cloud․ru, рассказал, где проходят границы ИИ: физические, экономические и человеческие. ➡️ Читайте полное интервью Михаила в журнале «Сноб»

🔥13custom 523556531421266290010custom 539998441471951904610🤝1

7 Nov 2026, 07:45 UTC≈2,220 views18 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Участвуйте в AI Journey вместе с Cloud․ru 🌐 26–28 ноября отправляемся в «путешествие в мир искусственного интеллекта». В Москве пройдет AI Journey, ежегодная международная конференция по искусственному интеллекту, где ученые, инженеры и лидеры индустрии будут говорить о новых исследованиях, разработках и о том, как ИИ меняет бизнес и повседневную жизнь. Cloud․ru тоже будет на AIJ — приходите на наши выступления и с…

👍8🔥4custom 52355653142126629004🤝2

6 Nov 2026, 14:16 UTC≈1,910 views32 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Все самое интересное — под капотом ⭐️ Три недели назад мы провели нашу технологическую конференцию GoCloud Tech 2026: показали, как устроены наши сервисы, разобрали их архитектуру, поговорили о разработке и опыте внедрения ИИ. Как это было — смотрите в видео. Материалы с конференции уже в Cloud․ru Hub ☁️ В нашем новом канале вы найдете записи докладов, дискуссий и фотографии с GoCloud Tech. Переходите и подписыв…

custom 539998441471951904611custom 523556531421266290010🔥8👍2custom 52379290709388587631

5 Nov 2026, 17:05 UTC≈2,140 views35 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Запускаем новый Telegram-канал — Cloud․ru Hub ☁️ За нашими сервисами стоят сложные инженерные решения, эксперименты и большая команда экспертов в облаках, ИИ и кибербезопасности. В канале Cloud․ru Hub будем показывать технологическую кухню Cloud․ru: как устроены наши решения, какие технологии под капотом и кто создает наши облачные и ИИ-сервисы. ▶️новые фичи в сервисах и как с ними работать ▶️лайфхаки, инновации и …

custom 523556531421266290014custom 539998441471951904610🔥8✍3

3 Nov 2026, 15:26 UTC≈2,280 views30 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Агроплатформа в облаке: –30% затрат и 99,95% доступности ИТ-компания «Риджитех» разработала и перенесла цифровую платформу агрокомплекса «Иванисово» в облако Cloud.ru Evolution. Цифровая платформа позволяет планировать сельскохозяйственные работы, управлять персоналом, а также контролировать качество продукции. В основе решения — цифровой двойник тепличного производства, объединяющий IoT, компьютерное зрение и пред…

🔥15custom 53999844147195190468🤝5custom 52355653142126629002

31 Oct 2026, 07:38 UTC≈2,990 views50 reactions1 Starread 13 November 2026
Photo

Михаил Лобоцкий — о развитии Cloud․ru, будущем облачного рынка и новой экономике ИИ В интервью «Коммерсанту» генеральный директор Cloud․ru Михаил Лобоцкий рассказал о стратегии компании, развитии ИИ-направления и трансформации облачной индустрии. ▶️Как рынок справляется с последствиями атак на дата-центры ▶️Почему Cloud․ru строит собственный ЦОД ▶️Как растет спрос на вычислительные ресурсы для ИИ и какие технологии…

🔥20custom 523556531421266290016👏9🤪4🤝1

30 Oct 2026, 10:05 UTC≈2,530 views37 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥16custom 523556531421266290010👍9👀2

28 Oct 2026, 15:18 UTC≈2,260 views43 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Запустили собственное решение класса CNAPP ✨ Evolution Protection Platform — решение от команды Cloud․ru для оценки безопасности облачной инфраструктуры. Платформа помогает находить небезопасные настройки, контролировать соответствие корпоративным стандартам и снижать риски несанкционированного доступа и утечек данных. Evolution Protection Platform позволяет: ▶️анализировать конфигурации облачных ресурсов и выявля…

🔥21👏10custom 53999844147195190468👍4

28 Oct 2026, 07:46 UTC≈2,100 views26 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Cloud․ru на SOC Forum 2026 🌐 На этой неделе в Москве проходит SOC Forum 2026 — мероприятие, объединяющее бизнес, государство и экспертов отрасли информационной безопасности. Как обеспечить развитие ИИ в России, масштабировать его применение и сохранить контроль над данными и критической инфраструктурой? Эти вопросы сегодня обсудят участники сессии Cloud․ru на SOC Forum. Эксперты расскажут: ▶️Какую роль играют обл…

🔥12🎉6👏6custom 52355653142126629002

27 Oct 2026, 14:58 UTC≈2,230 views39 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

Как ИТ-компания группы «Самолет» сократила затраты на VDI ⤵️ «Диджитал Девелопмент» — ИТ-компания группы «Самолет» — перенесла виртуальные рабочие места проектировщиков в Cloud․ru. Через VDI специалисты работают с AutoCAD, Revit и другими приложениями для 2D- и 3D-проектирования. Главная задача — снизить стоимость инфраструктуры без потери производительности. Что сделали в Cloud․ru ▶️перевели около 900 виртуальных…

🔥23👍8custom 53999844147195190467😁1

26 Oct 2026, 16:02 UTC≈2,320 views40 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

Облако для критической инфраструктуры — это не только аттестация и набор СЗИ 🛡️ За ним стоят архитектурные решения, гарантированные ресурсы, сценарии миграции и, главное, способность инфраструктуры развиваться вместе с задачами заказчика. Лилия Кучина, директор управления по работе с государственным сектором, рассказывает, как устроен этот подход в Cloud․ru: ▶️Может ли защищенная инфраструктура быть гибкой? ▶️Как п…

🔥16👍13custom 52355653142126629007🤝4

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @cloudruprovider. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@cloudruprovider edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTCAnonymous Poll227 voters

Доверяете ли вы сложные задачи ИИ-агентам? 👁

  1. Да, использую агента для сложных задач44%
  2. Использую агента только для рутинных задач41%
  3. Только тестирую их возможности22%
  4. Пока не работаю с ИИ-агентами12%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ИТ-Пикник
@IT_picnic · 22,795
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Yandex Cloud
@yandexcloudnews · 23,943
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 September 2026
Ozon Tech
@ozon_tech · 30,189
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Selectel
@Selectel · 62,423
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Ozon Team
@ozonteam · 23,486
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cloud.ru” (@cloudruprovider), 10,685 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cloudruprovider.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.