Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for closefans.store

Channel

closefans.store

@closefansstore

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,424subscribers

+3,393 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003960160876
TypeChannel
Username@closefansstore
Descriptionодежда от твоих любимых артистов
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 27 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/closefansstore

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

11,700 average views per post against 7,184 subscribers — an engagement rate of 162.4%. Across the 16,385 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,183–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.90% and 25.3%, with a median of 13.6%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured17 of 17 published in the window (0 exact, 17 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled198,370
Mature posts only132.7% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers7,184 measured 2 November 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 16,385 channels · p10 3.55% · p25 6.90% · p50 13.6% · p75 25.3% · p90 41.1%
Position in cohort99.811th percentile · 11.9× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.021% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

4,0317,4245,727.56 August 2026 — 4,031 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,031 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,047 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,058 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,076 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,070 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,064 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,063 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,056 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,063 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,060 subscribers8 September 2026 — 4,236 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,336 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,345 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,341 subscribers30 September 2026 — 6,567 subscribers7 October 2026 — 6,749 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,955 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,973 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,994 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,031 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,107 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,110 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,152 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,184 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,380 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,424 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net +3,393. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,522–7,933 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 12:587,424+44
5 Nov 2026, 22:587,380+196
2 Nov 2026, 23:297,184+32
31 Oct 2026, 00:287,152+42
28 Oct 2026, 01:377,110+3
25 Oct 2026, 00:097,107+76
21 Oct 2026, 20:487,031+37
19 Oct 2026, 02:216,994+21
16 Oct 2026, 03:376,973+18
13 Oct 2026, 10:006,955+206
7 Oct 2026, 11:566,749+182
30 Sept 2026, 07:206,567+226
19 Sept 2026, 17:426,341-4
15 Sept 2026, 16:376,345+9
12 Sept 2026, 05:396,336+2,100
8 Sept 2026, 00:574,236+176
2 Sept 2026, 14:554,060-3
30 Aug 2026, 19:464,063+7
27 Aug 2026, 16:384,056-7
25 Aug 2026, 00:494,063first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
181.2%
avg views ÷ 7,424 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,500
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held40 (27 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total349,760
Reactions total7,187
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 02:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
132
Videos
12
Links
65

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,422 reactions across 34 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7,75467.9%
🔥2,25219.7%
👍1,34211.7%
👎740.648%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,495 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,680 views229 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤177🔥33👍19

10 Nov 2026, 14:15 UTC≈2,080 views337 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Кажется, мы обещали чей-то дроп в ноябре… Напомните, чей?😅

🔥193❤113👍29👎2

9 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTC≈2,890 views340 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

👕Лонгслив «Котики»👕 Любимый всеми принт теперь в новой форме! — белый цвет — яркий принт на передней стороне и рукавах — 100% хлопок — размер в наличии: L/XL 🐱➡️ closefans.store

❤245🔥76👍17👎2

8 Nov 2026, 09:05 UTC≈3,270 views366 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

👕Серая футболка «Котики»👕 Кто-то сказал СЕРАЯ ФУТБОЛКА КОТИКИ? — цвет, который вы так ждали — 100% хлопок — размеры в наличии: S,M, L, XL Вы просили — мы сделали, теперь ваша очередь покупать...😅

❤281🔥59👍26

7 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC≈5,640 views397 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🌸Подвески «Котики» доступны на сайте!🌸 Забирайте, пока есть возможность…🫣

❤295🔥76👍26

7 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈3,300 views217 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤169🔥36👍12

7 Nov 2026, 13:03 UTC≈3,680 views325 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🧢Кепка «Котики»🧢 Ой, кажется кто-то добрался до кепки и расцарапал её... Надеемся, вы не против! — черная ткань с эффектом потёртости — фирменный принт вышит спереди и сбоку — удобый регулируемый ремешок сзади В наличии на closefans.store🤩

❤230🔥63👍32

6 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC≈3,940 views589 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ну что, дождались дропа? Теперь время хвастаться! Что присмотрели себе?😳

❤437👍92🔥57👎3

5 Nov 2026, 12:00 UTC≈94,100 views442 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🤩mzlff x closefans🤩 Расширенный дроп коллекции «Котики» Еще больше айтемов из самой замурчательной коллекции уже доступно на сайте! Советуем не откладывать покупку, количество товаров строго ограничено.🤪 ✨Купить: closefans.store

❤312🔥83👍45👎2

4 Nov 2026, 13:37 UTC≈64,800 views516 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✨Онлайн дроп расширенной коллекции «Котики»✨ Завтра в 15:00 наконец-то настанет момент, которого вы все ждали... Что возьмёте?🤩

❤382👍81🔥53

3 Nov 2026, 14:15 UTC≈5,370 views191 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🙂Худи «Rockstar»🙂 Остатки особенно сладки в ожидании новых дропов… — 100% хлопок — лимитированный айтем — станьте центром внимания с акцентным принтом — размер в наличии: S/M Кто знает, где купить?🐱

❤140🔥34👍15👎2

2 Nov 2026, 14:20 UTC≈5,070 views283 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤204🔥57👍22

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @closefansstore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“closefans.store” (@closefansstore), 7,424 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/closefansstore.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.