I havenβt been dropping so much plays here . Been more active on my gamble channel with bangers lately . Join up for quick Xs . Lowkey kept a 70%+ win rate all year long https://t.me/jahmangems
π³4π3π2

Channel
@cliqueplays
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
5,509subscribers
+4,056 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001713614792 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cliqueplays |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cliqueplays |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:42 | 5,509 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:13 | 5,519 | -29 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 5,548 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 5,559 | -19 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 5,578 | -18 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 5,596 | +4,338 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 1,258 | -58 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 1,316 | -83 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 1,399 | -49 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 1,448 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 1,453 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 8 September 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
162 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 48 | 29.6% | |
| β€ | 32 | 19.8% | |
| π | 30 | 18.5% | |
| π«‘ | 10 | 6.17% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 9 | 5.56% | |
| π | 9 | 5.56% | |
| π | 6 | 3.70% | |
| π³ | 5 | 3.09% | |
| β | 3 | 1.85% | |
| π | 3 | 1.85% | |
| π€£ | 2 | 1.23% | |
| π | 1 | 0.617% | |
| πΎ | 1 | 0.617% | |
| π | 1 | 0.617% | |
| πΏ | 1 | 0.617% | |
| π€ | 1 | 0.617% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2025 to 16 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I havenβt been dropping so much plays here . Been more active on my gamble channel with bangers lately . Join up for quick Xs . Lowkey kept a 70%+ win rate all year long https://t.me/jahmangems
π³4π3π2
Seems market improved slightly Onchain this week . Should have some good plays rolling up next week π₯ Hopefully , this pump isnβt preparing for another bearish retracement π
β€βπ₯4β3π«‘2
BNTI ( BSC ) I usually dont FOMO plays on this main channel ( and rather do mainly utility projects ) . But , this one poked my instincts . Iβd look out for an entry as BSC plays popping out lately .. https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0xb6491a404b211d433d249164f9db18345b918319
π₯4π3π2π1
$SHADOW has a decent launch so far with a 550k ATH currently . I'd be holding my bag while it chill at 160k market cap .
π₯6π3π1
SHADOW ( SOL ) https://t.me/+f5_B7br8BqhkODY0 π Info: $SHDW is a private execution layer on Solana, protecting swaps, timings, and intent from MEV bots, copy-traders, and surveillance. Doxxed advisors Jacob and Mahendran. Products live at launch: β’ SHDW Trade β private, quantum-safe Solana swaps β’ SHDW Wallet β device-only, zero-tracking wallet β’ SHDW Screener β real-time token discovery with stealth entry. X : hβ¦
β€5π3πΎ1π³1
Happy new years chads to all members of Clique alpha community We experienced lots of wins in 2025 and we are definitely doubling it in 2026 π₯ More wins , More Xs , more giveaways, endless alphas OBSERVE GREATNESS π₯β‘οΈ
β€6π₯3π1π1
Another market dump . Not so surprising , just a typical Q4 in the crypto space π In as much as Iβm very stabled lately . It doesnβt cancel out the fact that BTC still got some much potentials for growth This is prolly a geopolitical manipulation or some kinda of liquidity grab . Meanwhile . Iβd be sharing some more high risk gambles on @jahmangems and some long terms projects here STAY TUNED . 2026 is ours to grβ¦
π₯5β€4π«‘3πΏ1
$ROI was dropped at 100k entry on @jahmangems . Pulled up a 5.6x to a 560k ATH https://t.me/jahmangems/4503
π₯5β€3π«‘3π1
$ORANGE was dropped at 300k entry on @jahmangems . Pulled up a 30x to a 9M ATH https://t.me/jahmangems/4479
β€βπ₯5π2π1
Interesting thing here is that we actually did see an ATH break as predicted after which we saw a liquidity sweep We saw the craziest amount of liquidity movement & liquidity in crypto history Really nice recovery for BNB here as well . But then , intuition and some data might be calling for a second dip . I might be wrong . NFA
π₯6π2π«‘2
MAGENTA Buy! ππππππππππππππππππππππ π Spent $205.35 (0.05 ETH) π Got 11,165 MGNT π€ Buyer / TX πͺ New Holder π· Price $0.0185 πΈ Market Cap $185,146 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending
π3π₯3π1π€£1
Watching this launch in few mins - 18:00 UTC π MAGENTA is here, the ultimate all-in-one DeFi hub - $MGNT - check socials for full info - will be updating at launch as and when I enter. π’ Telegram: @MagentaGlobal (ππΌ) π Website: https://magentacore.co/
π6β€2π1π€£1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cliqueplays. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βCLIQUE ALPHA PLAYS πβ (@cliqueplays), 5,509 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cliqueplays.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.