15 measurements spanning 15 days, net -139. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,688–13,869 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 14:08
13,709
-9
21 Aug 2026, 05:43
13,718
-3
20 Aug 2026, 08:12
13,721
+2
19 Aug 2026, 11:12
13,719
-15
18 Aug 2026, 14:19
13,734
-13
17 Aug 2026, 12:47
13,747
-20
16 Aug 2026, 06:46
13,767
-24
14 Aug 2026, 15:25
13,791
-5
13 Aug 2026, 05:24
13,796
-6
12 Aug 2026, 07:13
13,802
-14
11 Aug 2026, 06:02
13,816
-16
10 Aug 2026, 03:32
13,832
-7
9 Aug 2026, 02:51
13,839
-8
8 Aug 2026, 06:14
13,847
-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:45
13,848
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
21
Videos
3
Links
16
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
98 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
74
75.5%
🔥
7
7.14%
🤣
7
7.14%
😁
5
5.10%
🤯
3
3.06%
🕊
2
2.04%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2025 to 11 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
haven't posted in here for a while
I needed time to figure out what I actually wanted to build
that's done now
here's what's coming,
I've been working with a platform called Content Rewards (whop)
people on the platform are making thousands monthly, it's literally just posting clips on tiktok ig & youtube lol
I just made $1k from 3 shorts posted on tiktok
i'm not selling anything
on the contrary i'm taking yo…
been ghost in here for a minute
last few months we secured some of the biggest clipping deals ever
campaigns most people don't even know exist
now i'm back
i tried promoting my free community in here multiple times before i disappeared. some of you joined. most of you ignored it - that's fine
free doesn't create urgency
here's the update: that free door is now closed.
as of 2026 the community is paid.
38K cli…
After being approached by Russell Brunson himself to build him a course on clipping
I was invited on his podcast to share my expertise
Do with this information as you will
The opportunity of clipping is only getting bigger by the day
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @clippinsecrets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2025 to 11 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“clipping secrets” (@clippinsecrets), 13,709 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clippinsecrets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.