Channel
Msq Biochemistry
@clinicalbio9
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,474subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 19 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001231106270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @clinicalbio9 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/clinicalbio9 |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 4 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 17:37 | 1,474 | -2 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 1,476 | +5 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 16:54 | 1,471 | no change |
| 25 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 1,471 | +4 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 1,467 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Thi_Qar_H · 26,184
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026
@an_abd1 · 19,162
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 October 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Msq Biochemistry” (@clinicalbio9), 1,474 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clinicalbio9.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.