Официальный канал бренда Climtcosmetics.
Ищи нас в Золотое Яблоко | Lamoda l Летуаль | WB | OZON | ЯМ
Ссылки тут👇🏼
https://taplink.cc/climt
Наши продукты просты в использовании и созданы для того, чтобы макияж и уход были максимально комфортными.
Created
Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,676–10,731 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 23:22
10,724
+17
13 Aug 2026, 14:17
10,707
+18
12 Aug 2026, 11:23
10,689
+7
11 Aug 2026, 12:33
10,682
-18
10 Aug 2026, 09:47
10,700
-1
9 Aug 2026, 08:21
10,701
-12
8 Aug 2026, 08:15
10,713
-12
7 Aug 2026, 06:22
10,725
+12
6 Aug 2026, 09:10
10,713
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:49
10,713
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 10,724 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
23 (24 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
24,934
Reactions total
1,265
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,660
Videos
≈189
Links
≈433
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 55s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
907 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
440
48.5%
🔥
160
17.6%
❤🔥
92
10.1%
👏
68
7.50%
👍
45
4.96%
💔
25
2.76%
😍
18
1.98%
😁
14
1.54%
custom 5474135749479662916
12
1.32%
👌
11
1.21%
💋
9
0.992%
custom 5474357017604820082
7
0.772%
🤔
6
0.662%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,265reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кажется, нам не хватало именно этого оттенка туши💗
Встречайте новый Wild Fuchsia — яркий, необычный и точно не для тех, кто боится цвета
Можно добавить немного оттенка на кончики ресниц или сделать полноценный акцент на глазах. А вы бы попробовали фуксию в макияже?
WB: WW669722
Ozon
А если представить, что наши продукты — это люди?
Кто-то из них точно был бы душой компании, кто-то звездой вечеринки
🤎 А теперь самое интересное, а какой продукт больше всего похож на вас?
Тестируем термотушь в жару и во время активности ☀️
Лиза проехала 2 километра — это, конечно, не полноценная тренировка, но для эксперимента вполне достаточно 😄
А итог вы можете увидеть на видео: тушь не осыпалась, не отпечаталась и в течение всего теста комфортно ощущалась на глазах
[А еще если летом внезапно окажетесь на речке или море, за макияж можно не переживать]
Нам было очень интересно провести этот экспе…
Ты точно правильно наносишь тинт?
Если наносить его сразу толстым слоем из тюбика, тинт может лечь пятнами, а растушевать его будет гораздо сложнее
Попробуйте наносить небольшое количество продукта кистью — так он распределяется тонко и равномерно, без проплешин и лишней плотности🤍
Тинт Pafos
WB: WW669732
А вы наносите тинт кистью или прямо из тюбика? Делитесь в комментариях!
Наш победитель Climt Crew за июль💛
Поздравляем Кристину и благодарим за такую классную работу! Желаем вдохновения, новых идей и дальнейшего развития в создании контента✨
И, конечно, спасибо каждому, кто принял участие. Нам очень приятно видеть ваши видео с продуктами Climtcosmetics
Climt Crew — это возможность стать частью нашего сообщества: снимайте ролики с нашей косметикой, отмечайте @climtcosmetics, используйт…
Ваш новый must-have для губ от Climtcosmetics 💋
Мы создали бальзамы, которые хочется носить с собой каждый день: увлажнение, комфортная нелипкая текстура и нежный оттенок в одном продукте
Гиалуроновая кислота и витамин Е помогают восстановить сухие губы, вернуть им мягкость и ухоженный вид уже после первого применения
4 оттенка — 4 настроения:
🍒 ягодный YUMMY CHERRY
🍓 нежный SUNNY RASPBERRY
🍊 свежий SWEET ORANGE
…
Идеальный макияж губ начинается с правильного комбо💛
В этом видео использовали:
✨ новый бальзам для губ — для увлажнения и подготовки;
✨ карандаш Rich 01 (WW710718) — для мягкого контура;
✨ тинт Pafos (WW669732) — чтобы добавить губам насыщенный оттенок;
✨ блеск Charlotte (WW266629) — для красивого сияния и объема.
Сохраняйте это комбо и обязательно попробуйте повторить😁
У нас отличная новость ✈️🤍
Climtcosmetics теперь официально представлен в аэропорту Пулково!
Теперь перед путешествием вы можете заглянуть за любимыми продуктами в зоне внутренних вылетов и взять с собой всё необходимое для идеального макияжа в дороге
📍Санкт-Петербург, Аэропорт Пулково
Пулковское шоссе, д. 41, лит. ЗА
Зона внутренних вылетов, 2 этаж, магазин Boutique de parfums
До встречи в путешествиях!
На создание креативного макияжа нас вдохновляет всё вокруг 🦋
Цвета природы, настроение, детали — всё может стать поводом для нового образа
Не бойтесь экспериментировать и добавлять в макияж яркие акценты 🩵
Тушь
WB: WW669722
Ozon
Карандаш
WB: WW365085
Ozon
Этого точно нет в вашей сумочке… пока
🩷 Совсем скоро ассортимент Climt дополнится новыми восстанавливающими бальзамами для губ в 4 оттенках
Идеальны для ежедневного ухода, подготовки к макияжу или сияющего финиша поверх любимого карандаша
Какой оттенок положите в свою сумочку?
🎀 Yummy Cherry — холодный ягодно-розовый
🩰 Sunny Raspberry — теплый розовый
🦩 Sweet Orange — теплый коралловый
🩷 Choco Plum — холодный роз…
Еще одна классная работа для Climt Crew 🤍
Мы решили, что теперь будем не только выбирать ежемесячного победителя программы, но и каждую неделю делиться одной из самых классных работ наших участников
Сегодня показываем видео, которое нам очень понравилось. Благодарим Юлию за творчество и любовь к Climtcosmetics✨
Если тоже хотите увидеть свою работу в нашем профиле — снимайте видео с нашей косметикой и добавляйте хэ…
❤24👏14💔14🔥8
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @climtcosmetics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 14,843 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Climtcosmetics” (@climtcosmetics), 10,724 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/climtcosmetics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.