Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Клиент прав

Channel

Клиент прав

@client_pravv

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

7,730subscribers

-168 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001798506498
TypeChannel
Username@client_pravv
DescriptionЮрист по защите прав потребителей и семейному праву. Невыдуманные судебные истории😅
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/client_pravv

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,7307,8987,8146 August 2026 — 7,898 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,897 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,895 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,889 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,879 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,871 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,866 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,856 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,853 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,847 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,843 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,837 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,832 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,817 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,810 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,799 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,780 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,771 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,765 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,760 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,764 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,755 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,741 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,736 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,730 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,705–7,923 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 00:177,730-6
2 Nov 2026, 06:017,736-5
30 Oct 2026, 08:107,741-14
27 Oct 2026, 02:587,755-9
23 Oct 2026, 16:207,764+4
20 Oct 2026, 11:567,760-5
17 Oct 2026, 16:477,765-6
14 Oct 2026, 22:367,771-9
11 Oct 2026, 23:417,780-19
5 Oct 2026, 14:227,799-11
27 Sept 2026, 15:587,810-7
18 Sept 2026, 03:587,817-15
14 Sept 2026, 02:007,832-5
10 Sept 2026, 11:197,837-6
5 Sept 2026, 09:577,843-4
1 Sept 2026, 02:357,847-6
29 Aug 2026, 12:147,853-3
26 Aug 2026, 04:047,856-10
23 Aug 2026, 10:397,866-5
19 Aug 2026, 15:047,871first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.17%
avg views ÷ 7,730 subscribers
Avg views / post
709
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held49 (8 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total9,211
Reactions total352
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 12:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
180
Videos
31
Links
119

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,604 reactions across 48 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥49430.8%
❤48730.4%
👍19512.2%
😁17510.9%
🤣734.55%
💯684.24%
🤔332.06%
🤯211.31%
👌150.935%
👏150.935%
😭90.561%
💔70.436%
🙈60.374%
🤓30.187%
🤝20.125%
🕊10.062%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,653 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 49 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @client_pravv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (15.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:31 UTC242 views18 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Что мы обсудим в пятницу вечером? То, что мое заявление о взыскании суд расходов удовлетворено на 30%. Как обычно. И это печально. Суд считает нормальным за две инстанции взыскать 100.000р. По сложному делу о недействительности сделок дарения недвижимости. На днях смотрела рилс, о том, что юристу в арбитраже за 1 ходатайство взыскали 130.000 из оплаченных 150.000 р. 1, ходатайство Карл!? И две инстанции длиною в …

😭9💯7❤1👍1

Signed Nataly Sitnikova

3 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC575 views38 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Даутизм. Именно так сегодня сказала судья Королевского городского. Я обосновывала ходатайство об обозрении подлинников ПТС и СТС , и сказала, это для того, чтобы у суда не возникало сомнений, что мы делим именно то имущество, которое принадлежит именно нам. И она спрашивает, крича: «у меня что, по вашему, даутизм?» 😳 Типа зачем вы мне объясняете что и почему? Я сама знаю! 🧐 Новый диагноз или есть такое? И еще…

😁20🤯8❤6👍4

Signed Nataly Sitnikova

29 Oct 2026, 18:03 UTC765 views33 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Я не то, что предсказать результат кассации не могу, я даже представить не могла , что сегодня уже получу определение кассации от позавчера !) Мой шок в шоке 😅 это самая быстрая кассация ⚡️

🔥24😁9

Signed Nataly Sitnikova

29 Oct 2026, 09:52 UTC785 views42 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Рубрика «не нам судить, но мы обсудим» Листаю ленту в инсте и вижу призыв к обучению , а меня такое всегда привлекает, но тут оттолкнуло. Автор курса спросил: вы юрист или адвокат и не знаете , удовлетворят ли вашу кассационную жалобу ? Тогда вам ко мне на курс🙌😂 У меня мысленный вопрос: а вы знаете, что удовлетворят ? Вы провидец ? За 23 года практики я поняла, что в суде может произойти все , что угодно. Особе…

💯20😁11❤9👏2

Signed Nataly Sitnikova

27 Oct 2026, 13:43 UTC742 views46 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Сейчас будет пост радости и возмущения одновременно. Почему я рада? Потому что сейчас удалось во второй кассации отстоять право моей доверительницы на равный раздел квартиры. (Отстоять , конечно, громко сказано, меня только спросили , поддерживаю ли я свое возражение и я сказала «Да»🫰😁). Кратко напомню, что ответчик хотел признать личное вложение в квартиру, поскольку его мама перевела часть денег застройщику. И пе…

❤29💔7👍6🔥3👏1

Signed Nataly Sitnikova

27 Oct 2026, 05:09 UTC598 views28 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Вчера в процессе по разделу имущества , который находится на стадии беседы, у нас случилось странное. Определяем дату прекращения ведения совместного хозяйства . Моя доверительница настаивает на дате, когда супруг выехал из квартиры и больше не возвращался. Старший сын помогал перевозить вещи и мы попросили его вызвать в суд. А вот другая сторона предлагает непонятную дату - дата решения о расторжении брака. Суд …

❤19👍9

Signed Nataly Sitnikova

25 Oct 2026, 14:44 UTC647 views38 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Дошли руки до рассказа о победе в кассации. По решению о разделе имущества кладовка досталась моей доверительнице, а она, в свою очередь, должна выплатить бм половину ее кадастровой стоимости. Ответчика это решение не устроило, так как он хочет половину кладовки , а не компенсацию . Однако, в суде первой инстанции он ее к разделу не предъявлял , не просил себе 1/2. Наш предложенный вариант раздела не оспаривал, з…

❤21🔥16👍1

Signed Nataly Sitnikova

21 Oct 2026, 09:09 UTC906 views38 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Делюсь опытом. У меня приняли исковое заявление о разделе имущества с оценкой, подготовленной мной с помощью ИИ. Аналог оценки из объявлений АВИТО , предоставляемой ранее по аналогичным делам. Выглядит красиво в отличии от объявлении , презентабельно и убедительно, ну а если ответчик не согласен, пусть делает судебную - проверим с вами точность ИИ расчета ) Но сам факт) не обездвижили , разрешили заявиться с таки…

🔥30❤8

Signed Nataly Sitnikova

19 Oct 2026, 06:42 UTC858 views15 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Вообще , при подготовке претензии и иска важно определить кто именно должен нести ответственность и иногда это очень сложно сделать. К примеру: снег с крыши магазина или дома упал на припаркованный автомобиль (Собственник или УК), Дерево упало на автомобиль ( собственник территории или соответствующая служба), колесо прокололи, попав в глубокую яму на дороге (собственник территории , обслуживающая организация) ,…

❤8👍6🔥1

Signed Nataly Sitnikova

19 Oct 2026, 06:24 UTC698 views14 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

ПАРАШЮТИСТ ПРИЗЕМЛИЛСЯ НА ЧУЖОЙ АВТОМОБИЛЬ. А ПРИ ЧЁМ ЗДЕСЬ ЗАКОН О ЗАЩИТЕ ПРАВ ПОТРЕБИТЕЛЕЙ? 🚘 СИТУАЦИЯ 28 июля 2024 г. на аэродроме Верхний Егорлык состоялось мероприятие «День парашютиста», организатором которого являлся некий индивидуальный предприниматель. Программа фестиваля включала в себя показательные прыжки с парашютом. Во время выступления один из парашютистов приземлился прямо на капот автомобиля! (П.С…

👍10❤2🔥2

Signed Nataly Sitnikova

14 Oct 2026, 10:31 UTC718 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Теперь все) Спасибо, Оля

❤4🔥1

Signed Nataly Sitnikova

14 Oct 2026, 10:31 UTC720 views24 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🔥🔥С пылу с жару подъехали новые товарные знаки 🔥🔥 🔥 "Клиент прав" - знак для канала и практики моей любимой коллеги Натальи Ситниковой. Наташа 13 (Наташ, поправь меня?) лет отработала в суде секретарём и помощником судьи, которая вела семейные споры, а потом стала практиковать сама. И делает это блестяще. Сейчас мы с Наташей ведём одно общее дело на двоих о сложном разделе совместно нажитого имущества, и я рада, ч…

🔥17❤7

Signed Nataly Sitnikova

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @client_pravv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @client_pravv as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
17 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Клиент прав” (@client_pravv), 7,730 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/client_pravv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.