Channel

𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐢𝐝𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐮DD 𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐫RT 𝐝𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐝𝐭ER

@clickzaqui

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

31,552subscribers

+8,582 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 2 July 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,188 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2025 to 3 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @clickzaqui. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐢𝐝𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐮DD 𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐫RT 𝐝𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐝𝐭ER” (@clickzaqui), 31,552 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clickzaqui.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.