Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Clickise — говорим на языке Telegram Ads

@clickise

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,131subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001885840888
TypeChannel
Username@clickise
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/clickise

Growth

3,1313,1343,132.56 August 2026 — 3,134 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,134 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,131 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,131–3,134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:163,131-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:573,134no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:183,134first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 3,131 subscribers
Avg views / post
368
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (10 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total7,001
Reactions total204
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

234 reactions across 22 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8335.5%
🔥5824.8%
👍4418.8%
😁166.84%
62.56%
👌62.56%
❤‍🔥52.14%
👏52.14%
😢41.71%
🙏41.71%
🤩31.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC120 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Чем занимаются директологи на третьей неделе реалити? Тестируют смелые гипотезы и масштабируют успешные идеи. Ведь мы уже выходим на финишную прямую! Часики тикают 😉 В видео ребята рассказывают, какие объявления и аудитории сработали, сколько стоил трафик, где пришлось менять стратегию и какие мысли есть, чтобы одержать победу. Смотрите отчёты участников и забирайте лайфхаки для своих кампаний: ➡️ Анна Барсуко

1🔥1🤩1

7 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC154 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

В чём смысл рекламы, брат? В продажах. Деньги 🤑, хрустящие купюры 💷, переводы на карту 💳, оплата по счету 💸 и все в таком духе являются конечной целью рекламы. Даже самый дешевый подписчик не обрадует, если в итоге он не окупается. А чтобы окупался, человеку должно быть понятно, как перейти от просмотра объявления к покупке. Рассказываем про виды воронок и на что нужно обратить там внимание. 🟢 Прямая воронка Ре

3👍3🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC221 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💚 1 397 000₽ выплатили таргетологам Clickise за июль! Из которых 200 000₽+ получил один специалист. Все это в рамках нашей системы лояльности для агентств и таргетологов. Все начисления отображаются в TgBooster: можно посмотреть сумму кэшбэка и в любой момент вывести деньги на расчётный счёт. А ещё, запускаясь через Clickise, вы получите БЕСПЛАТНО: 🟢 PRO-доступ к сервисам TgBooster и TgMaps; 🟢 медиапланы для пе

4👍3🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC279 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 Сегодня в 11:30 мск подводим итоги второй недели реалити «Битва директологов»! В прямом эфире посмотрим, какие связки участники тестировали в СМИ, инфобизнесе, премиальной одежде и продвижении сервиса, а главное, к каким результатам и инсайтам они пришли. Сможете забрать уже проверенные идеи и адаптировать их под свои проекты. Встречаемся в 11:30. Подключайтесь ПО ССЫЛКЕ. Вход свободный! Предыдущие выпуски смот

🔥21👍1

30 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC307 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Влияет ли на Telegram Ads внесение Павла Дурова в перечень террористов и экстремистов Росфинмониторинга? Нет. Это решение касается лично основателя Telegram. Сам мессенджер не признан экстремистским или террористическим, новых ограничений для пользователей и рекламодателей из-за этой новости не появилось. Telegram Ads продолжает работать, рекламные кампании запускать можно. Следим за официальными разъяснениями и с

👍105🙏4

29 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC254 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🟢 Как таргетологу выдерживать конкуренцию, даже с чеком выше рынка Секрет успеха: не продавайте настройку Telegram Ads (внезапно). Таких предложений у клиента ещё десять, поэтому выбирать он будет по цене. Продавайте готовое решение его задачи. Не: «Настрою Telegram Ads, дополнительно могу сделать лендинг и креативы». А: «Соберу связку для получения заявок: подготовлю мини-лендинг, исправлю важные посты, сделаю не

4👍2🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC358 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @clickise_avitoPhoto

🔥 УЖЕ ЗАВТРА большой эфир по Авито Рекламе! 29 июля в 14:00 Олег Рыскин и Максим Оганов покажут, почему у одних Авито приводит целевых подписчиков в рамках KPI, а у других просто за обе щеки уплетает бюджет. Готовим мощный материал: разберём все детали в настройках кабинета, выбор аудиторий и ставок под разные ниши, подготовку канала и рабочие связки из реальных проектов. Ещё прямо в эфире выберем пять ниш из комм

🔥32👍1

27 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC474 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩 «Битва директологов» продолжается! Участники уже показали результаты первой недели. У всех цель одна: привлечь подписчиков в свои МАКС-каналы через Яндекс Директ. ✅ Артём Себекин, ниша «СМИ»: 36 подписок по цене около 50₽. ✅ Анна Барсукова, ниша «Премиальная женская одежда»: 30 подписчиков по 217₽. ✅ Олеся Нестерова, ниша «Психология»: 12 подписчиков по 293₽. ✅ Даниил Васильев, ниша «Сервис для ведения и а

5👍2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @clickise. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 59,083 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Clickise — говорим на языке Telegram Ads” (@clickise), 3,131 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clickise.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.