Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Claudia Nicolasa

Channel

Claudia Nicolasa

@claudianicolasa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

7,214subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001529555015
TypeChannel
Username@claudianicolasa
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/claudianicolasa

Growth

7,2147,2667,2407 August 2026 — 7,266 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,264 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,257 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,248 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,246 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,229 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,221 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,214 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,206–7,274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 16:177,214-7
23 Aug 2026, 15:547,221-8
20 Aug 2026, 02:477,229-17
16 Aug 2026, 19:597,246-2
13 Aug 2026, 05:077,248-9
10 Aug 2026, 15:327,257-7
7 Aug 2026, 18:587,264-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:327,266first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 17 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.4%
avg views ÷ 7,214 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,830
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held12 (17 May 202611 August 2026)
Views total5,490
Reactions total141
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

473 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
32969.6%
👍5912.5%
👏265.50%
🤯224.65%
💯112.33%
😱71.48%
🤗61.27%
🏆51.06%
🥰30.634%
😭20.423%
😁10.211%
🙏10.211%
🤔10.211%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 473reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,230 views46 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Se habla mucho del horror que es tener una pareja psicópata narcisista…. Pero poco se habla de que la verdadera pesadilla a veces empieza justo cuando al fin logras “salir” de esa relación. De esto trata el análisis de este domingo y para que conozcas el espeluznante caso te recomiendo ver este documental: “Una tóxica historia de amor”.

33👍11💯1🤗1

1 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,110 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Mañana analizaremos un caso real que me ha impactado mucho 🧠 👉🏻 Una mujer que se obsesiona con sus vecinos de enfrente y les hace la vida imposible hasta que toma la peor de las decisiones… Si os apetece verlo antes, está en el primer episodio de “El Peor Vecino Imaginable” de Netflix, un caso real que pasó en Estados Unidos. Y si no lo veis, no pasa nada, ya sabéis que os cuento la trama con calma para poder anali

19👍14👏3😱2🥰1🙏1

30 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈2,150 views55 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Buenísimas noticias 😍 Una de las cosas me habéis pedido desde que salió Es manipulación y no lo sabes era poder encontrarlo en vuestros países. Y poco a poco ese deseo se está haciendo realidad. A día de hoy, la edición en español ya está disponible en librerías de: 🇪🇸 España 🇲🇽 México 🇺🇸 Estados Unidos 🇨🇱 Chile 🇨🇴 Colombia 🇵🇪 Perú 🇪🇨 Ecuador 🇦🇷 Argentina 🇺🇾 Uruguay Además, el libro ya se ha vendido para su tradu

38👏9🏆5🤗2😱1

16 Jul 2026, 11:46 UTC≈2,830 views51 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Hoy a las 19:30 publico un video que grabé hace semanas, antes de irme de viaje, en el que os comparto una decisión que he tomado y los motivos detrás de esta. Es una decisión que me ha costado mucho. Hace dos años que apareció por mi cabeza pero que he ido retrasando por distintas razones. Espero que la entendáis. A algunos les va a encantar esta decisión, a otros muchos no tanto. Pero bueno, la vida son etapas,

44👍7

15 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC≈2,690 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Si llevas tiempo queriendo hacer terapia o sintiendo que necesitas entender mejor qué ocurre en tu vida, el coste económico ya no tiene por qué ser un problema. En mi clínica online Estar Contigo Terapia hemos creado una fórmula para que puedas acceder a una terapia de calidad, profunda, con profesionales cualificados y bien remunerados pero sin comprometer tu economía. Puedes reservar gratis tu primera sesión de v

15👏3

11 Jul 2026, 21:10 UTC≈2,720 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://youtu.be/DXPRW2IytvU?is=EpDcQurU1i2fMEUt

💯64

29 Jun 2026, 18:35 UTC≈3,470 views47 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Os comparto esta info por aquí ya que hasta ahora solo lo he mencionado por Instagram. Tengo amigos y compañeros de profesión en Venezuela que afortunadamente solo han sufrido daños materiales, por lo que están trabajando de forma directa para asistir a las víctimas más afectadas. Llevamos días haciendo donaciones, si quieres aportar aunque sea poquito será muy agradecido. Puedes ir viendo en nuestras historias de

43👍4

27 Jun 2026, 15:40 UTC≈2,800 views50 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Mañana publicaré el análisis de uno de los casos que más me ha impactado: el de una mujer que fingió durante 10 meses un embarazo y para conseguir un bebé le quitó la vida a una amiga que estaba embarazada, a la cual le hizo una horrible cesárea. Es un caso que nos muestra la importancia de no omitir las señales de la psicopatía femenina. Señales que muchas personas desconocen, ya que es distinta en mujeres que en h

🤯2212👍6💯4😱4👏2

31 May 2026, 14:18 UTC≈4,460 views51 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

En el vídeo esta noche analizaré una defensa psicológica de la que casi no se habla: El Altruismo Defensivo. Ese momento en el que alguien está roto por dentro, pero en vez de enfadarse, llorar o pedir ayuda… se pone a cuidar a los demás. Hablaremos de por qué hay personas que detectan antes las necesidades ajenas que las propias, por qué les cuesta tanto dejarse cuidar, y qué heridas pueden esconderse detrás de esa

44👍2👏2🤗2🤔1

27 May 2026, 12:50 UTC≈4,260 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://youtu.be/hahZ_GyFDGY?is=SmJxn0tYCgBYdagz

18👍5👏3🤗1

20 May 2026, 08:15 UTC≈4,410 views64 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Este domingo subo uno de los análisis psicológicos que más me ha removido preparar. 🎤⭐️ Vamos a hablar de Michael Jackson, pero no desde el morbo ni desde la polémica fácil. Vamos a intentar entender qué ocurre cuando un niño deja de ser tratado como un niño y se convierte demasiado pronto en proyecto, producto, símbolo y espectáculo. Hablaremos de infancia robada, trauma, vergüenza, fama, cuerpo, soledad, Neverla

47👍9👏4🥰2😭2

17 May 2026, 18:33 UTC≈3,270 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ya en YouTube el análisis de la hoguera de Ainhoa y Alex 🎬🧠 Y para los que no veis la Isla en este vídeo hablamos sobre los roles rígidos en pareja, sobre cómo podemos quedarnos atrapados en un papel y lo más interesante: Cómo a veces el que parece más fuerte, seguro e independiente… acaba siendo el más vulnerable https://youtu.be/mhGQqTUL8pI?is=bzNzPFFz-a62jn44

12👍1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @claudianicolasa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Claudia Nicolasa” (@claudianicolasa), 7,214 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/claudianicolasa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.