Channel
@clashcharts
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
25subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001898387339 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @clashcharts |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/clashcharts |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 25 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 26 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 26 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
13 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 53.8% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 30.8% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Silver on the screenshot. Over the last few days, volatility has fit nicely into the formula calculations. Levels are hit within just a few ticks. And not just Silver, by the way. ☝️Just a reminder: levels are updated/calculated daily, and access to them—as well as to the MAX PAIN screener—is free. By the way, we’ve conducted an extensive statistical analysis on how effectively Max Pain/ER levels can be integrated i…
🔥1
Gold: Max Pain Slopes and the Fed’s Next Move Looking ahead, the Max Pain levels for Gold have lined up with a distinct upward slope. As for me, this is highly informative, especially when paired with the growing chatter about a potential Fed rate hike. The backdrop? Inflation stubbornly refuses to back down amid the ongoing geopolitical turbulence 🙃. For those who have been following the channel for a while (and …
🔥1
Would you be willing to financially support the platform to keep it alive?
Shares as published, totalling 50%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which features on the platform do you find the most valuable?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
An Honest Update & The Road Ahead for Our Project Friends, I need to share an open and honest update with you. The project that my small team and I have been building for over 2 years is currently facing a serious crossroads. Recently, we’ve hit some heavy headwinds: our lead developer left the team, and some critical part of data-scraping software was blocked. Overcoming this crisis will require more than just or…
Silver Updates: The Deep Out-of-the-Money Whale Keeps Buying Open Interest on the 130/160 strikes keeps growing. Crucially, it’s hitting the tape exactly as a combined spread, not as separate legs. Someone is systematically scaling into this position.....🧐 But the spot price failed to hold above $79.20 and pulled back sharply. I’m strictly staying on the sidelines for now BUT systemic inflows are always rational …
👍1
Silver: A $2M Correction Bet or Just Noise? A fresh 130/160 spread just popped up in the Silver expiry series (with a little over 30 days to go). The logic here looks very much like a play on a correction. Is this an insider or just a speculative bet? All signs point to a speculative play, mostly because the delta of this spread is incredibly low (check the attached delta chart for this series). As you can see, the $…
👍1🔥1
Oil: "Heart Attack" Charts and the 92$(vs. 77%) A quick visual check shows that the Max Pain slope for Oil has started looking more like an "unhealthy heartbeat" than a market trend. No surprise there—it perfectly mirrors the "Hormuz Seesaw" in the headlines😁.But here’s where it gets interesting: Oil is stubbornly hovering around $92 but MAX PAIN Math’s Reality: The high-liquidity option series still highlight a ta…
👍1
Friday’s ER levels in action—plain and simple.🥇 In the absence of news drivers or White House speeches, the market moved like clockwork.😂😂😂 Without the "noise," price action becomes almost options-driven math game, staying perfectly within the expected volatility range. 1️⃣No macro drivers? No problem. 2️⃣The result: Math wins. 3️⃣The outcome: Prices hit the ER targets as calculated
🔥1
Gold made a move toward the resistance level (the expected volatility range). Strictly speaking, looking at the cluster of activity (highlighted on the chart), we assume the goal wasn't the level itself, but the liquidity left behind. In other words, it's a perfect "coincidence": the price moved there because the ER level isn't just floating in mid-air—it perfectly aligned with that liquidity. To stop the guessi…
👍1
And this is what the current slope of the MAX PAIN curve for OIL🛢 looks like for the period of May and beyond...interesting, right? #OIL
⚡1🤔1
Since April 22nd (my last mention), Gold has dropped by 4.3%. Back then, my hunch that prices would dip was based purely on observing the Max Pain slope for precious metals. 👉No "big brain" multi-layered analysis here—no COT data, no options deep dives, no retail order flow. So, was the Gold slide just a lucky coincidence! (Or maybe... not so coincidental??). 😉 By the way, today, prices made a solid bounce off the …
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @clashcharts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Would you be willing to financially support the platform to keep it alive?
Shares as published, totalling 50%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which features on the platform do you find the most valuable?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ClashCharts” (@clashcharts), 25 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clashcharts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.