Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ClaireBear the Bear called Claire

Channel

ClaireBear the Bear called Claire

@clairebeararts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,538subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002181701542
TypeChannel
Username@clairebeararts
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/clairebeararts

Growth

2,5322,5382,5357 August 2026 — 2,532 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,532 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,538 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,531–2,539 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:562,538+6
7 Aug 2026, 05:452,532no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:172,532first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.0%
avg views ÷ 2,538 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,220
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total18,265
Reactions total714
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

714 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 598982292070308857925836.1%
custom 578956075044805410821630.3%
custom 578521124565732933017724.8%
custom 5990144802732120397638.82%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 714reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC691 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Tag a friend here who would participate in a threesome with you and me (naked 😱)

custom 599014480273212039710custom 57852112456573293303

6 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC996 views100 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

What's your favorite part of the watermelon? Mine is the red Art for @mollie0904

custom 598982292070308857967custom 578956075044805410819custom 578521124565732933011custom 59901448027321203973

5 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC998 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Thank you for all the kind messages, you are truly amazing fur people, one day I promise I will hug each and every one of you ❤️ I am so blessed to have you all here with me .⁠。⁠*⁠♡✧⁠*˚ Two things :3 .I created a page on Bluesky for my comic, please follow and read it, I promise it will be worth your time ;) https://bsky.app/profile/pawjobheroes.bsky.social .If anyone wants to send me an anonymous message, ev

custom 598982292070308857915custom 57852112456573293305custom 57895607504480541082

5 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC≈1,000 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Honestly, don't you guys get tired of my art? I'm afraid that if I keep posting it, you'll get tired xD

custom 598982292070308857918custom 57852112456573293305

5 Aug 2026, 00:14 UTC≈1,020 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I have the power >: ] Art for @rawrdragon777

custom 578956075044805410850custom 598982292070308857913custom 59901448027321203976

3 Aug 2026, 22:23 UTC≈1,210 views77 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

草圖 @cayden @NoahGooder @cypherLA

custom 598982292070308857947custom 578956075044805410820custom 59901448027321203977custom 57852112456573293303

3 Aug 2026, 00:44 UTC≈1,100 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @pawjobcomicPhoto

Page 6 (50% )

custom 578521124565732933028custom 59898229207030885797custom 57895607504480541082

3 Aug 2026, 00:44 UTC≈1,120 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I confess that I'm loving making this comic I hope you read it :3

custom 578521124565732933012custom 57895607504480541082

2 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC≈1,150 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Big

custom 578521124565732933037custom 578956075044805410815custom 59901448027321203972

2 Aug 2026, 02:03 UTC≈1,290 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Guess who will be the main villain in the first comic ? https://t.me/pawjobcomic

custom 57852112456573293302

1 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,480 views83 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

gambar untuk @Alchmstudio @Parcoli @CainDingo

custom 578956075044805410845custom 599014480273212039721custom 578521124565732933013custom 59898229207030885794

1 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC≈1,400 views95 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Art for @Pogonip For those who don't know, today is the last day of Shark Week, but we're not going to let this date pass unnoticed for our dear shark friends. So let's wish a happy new year to all sharks in this group and also a happy birthday to everyone celebrating their birthday in February 🎂🎈🎉 I made this sketch as a sequel to the original drawing ;3 We love you ❤️

custom 598982292070308857968custom 578521124565732933024custom 59901448027321203973

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @clairebeararts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 23,152 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ClaireBear the Bear called Claire” (@clairebeararts), 2,538 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clairebeararts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.