Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ˖ ࣪‹ 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘦 .

Channel

˖ ࣪‹ 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘦 .

@cjklr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

216subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001644957434
TypeChannel
Username@cjklr
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cjklr

Growth

201216208.529 Aug 2026, 09:45 — 201 subscribers30 Aug 2026, 00:42 — 216 subscribers29 Aug 2026, 09:4530 Aug 2026, 00:42
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 199–218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 00:42216+15
29 Aug 2026, 09:45201first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
184.7%
avg views ÷ 216 subscribers
Avg views / post
399
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held13 (21 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total1,995
Reactions total356
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

689 reactions across 12 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 523140312153565645313519.6%
custom 52559413949791300387210.4%
custom 5260389014002765485669.58%
custom 5253636741297905610426.10%
custom 5274072328836240282385.52%
custom 5262590919181373858324.64%
custom 5352927412994718626324.64%
custom 5384090591887924567294.21%
custom 5359346701180090648273.92%
custom 5384382868707383072263.77%
custom 5195134648161702678253.63%
custom 5341547081100184153243.48%
custom 5233595363037828478213.05%
custom 5292168434803565965213.05%
custom 5228801097203739803202.90%
custom 5257970947415094682202.90%
custom 5460770829161755092202.90%
custom 5359661286059708582182.61%
custom 5307725008213151333111.60%
custom 5444873334133125693101.45%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 689 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
54
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 13 we hold a reading for · 69%
Most on one post
26
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cjklr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 23:44 UTC195 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026

اريدنصير 200😤

custom 52335953630378284785custom 52288010972037398033

28 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC312 views31 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ׅ ꒰𝝑 𓏲 ͜ 🪽𓂅 𝝔꒱ ֹ

custom 523359536303782847816custom 522880109720373980315

21 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC430 views44 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 525363674129790561042custom 52288010972037398032

14 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC487 views149 reactions3 Starsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 523140312153565645377custom 525594139497913003872

6 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC571 views124 reactions17 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⊹ ू𓏲 ❀ ୭ુ ⊹

custom 526038901400276548566custom 523140312153565645358

1 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC717 views28 reactions26 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ׅ 𖥔 ୨ 𓇬 ୧ 𖥔 ׅ

custom 535966128605970858218custom 544487333413312569310

30 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC659 views52 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

𐔌͡ ׅ ⁺ 𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 ⍵𝑒 ოᧉ𝑡 ᘛ ͡𐦯

custom 526259091918137385832custom 546077082916175509220

30 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC519 views61 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

୨ৎ ֹ ׅ ℱ𝑙𝑎𝑥𝑠𝑒𝑒𝑑 & 𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑖𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑘 ໋ ׅ 🧖🏻‍♀

custom 535292741299471862632custom 538409059188792456729

29 Jul 2026, 04:34 UTC523 views47 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

𓏲 𝅄 𝒰𝑠? ֹ ࡞⃘

custom 538438286870738307226custom 529216843480356596521

26 Jul 2026, 05:27 UTC718 views31 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

◞ ⁺ ◟⌣◞ ྀི ◟ ꒰🤩꒱ ◞ ྀི ◟⌣◞ ⁺ ◟

custom 525797094741509468220custom 530772500821315133311

22 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC539 views63 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

🦷🦷.

custom 527407232883624028238custom 519513464816170267825

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @cjklr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“˖ ࣪‹ 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘦 .” (@cjklr), 216 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cjklr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.