Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 泡芙女士的驾驶室(报告频道)

Channel

泡芙女士的驾驶室(报告频道)

@cjddbg124

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

6,745subscribers

+1,048 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002546848538
TypeChannel
Username@cjddbg124
Description记录
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cjddbg124

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,6976,7456,2218 August 2026 — 5,697 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,710 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,780 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,859 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,930 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,990 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,053 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,090 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,128 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,175 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,199 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,241 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,262 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,271 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,320 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,402 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,457 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,514 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,551 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,577 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,615 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,657 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,668 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,702 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,704 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,730 subscribers13 November 2026 — 6,745 subscribers8 August 202613 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 97 days, net +1,048. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,540–6,902 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 04:196,745+15
8 Nov 2026, 20:486,730+26
5 Nov 2026, 17:476,704+2
2 Nov 2026, 17:466,702+34
30 Oct 2026, 11:416,668+11
27 Oct 2026, 05:106,657+42
24 Oct 2026, 14:266,615+38
21 Oct 2026, 16:356,577+26
18 Oct 2026, 09:006,551+37
15 Oct 2026, 07:156,514+57
12 Oct 2026, 12:196,457+55
5 Oct 2026, 14:206,402+82
27 Sept 2026, 13:576,320+49
18 Sept 2026, 13:166,271+9
14 Sept 2026, 09:216,262+21
11 Sept 2026, 00:396,241+42
6 Sept 2026, 06:206,199+24
2 Sept 2026, 07:296,175+47
30 Aug 2026, 00:036,128+38
26 Aug 2026, 14:556,090first reading

Engagement

94 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.07%
avg views ÷ 6,745 subscribers
Avg views / post
342
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
66
of 94 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 65 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held94 (23 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total22,249
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
378
Videos
7
Links
782

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
24s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 94 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 66 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 09:31 UTC79 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

时间:2026-11-14 老师:沛沛 留名:小卡拉米 【📖基础评分】 人照:9 气质:9 身材:8 服务和态度:9.5 性价比:9 环境评分:9.5 ◉综合平均分:9 【硬件】:属于温婉御姐 颜值和频道照片一致 身高165左右 少许赘肉 胸大概c左右 【科室】:江宁东山小区 课室整洁 一次性用品齐全 【优点/优势】服务一流 态度热情 【缺点/建议】课室有点偏 【过程】:早就听说金陵四韵的大名,一直无缘见面,今天终于约到沛沛老师,进门后老师热情迎接,帮你更衣递水,陪你聊聊家常,之后进入陪浴环节,沛沛老师会把你全身洗净,浴室调情更是一流,用身子不停蹭你,之后便开始水中萧,结束后擦干上床,老师穿上准备的丝袜开始服务,先是b面按摩,一边调整力度一边和你聊天,按完后身体贴上来开始胸滑,过水,水平都是会所级的,翻过来到a面后所有流程再来一次,情到深处竟不自觉的和沛沛老师热吻起来,气氛烘托好后早已一柱擎天,沛沛老师一把含住开始口活,口…

14 Nov 2026, 00:44 UTC253 viewsread 14 November 2026

🥇拔得头筹 时间:2026-11-14 老师:米洛蒂 留名:匿名 【📖基础评分】 人照:9.7 气质:9.5 身材:9.4 服务和态度:9.9 性价比:9.8 环境评分:9.2 ◉综合平均分:9.58 【硬件】:颜值底子好,妆容精致,身材属于很好的炮架子,皮肤尚可,无赘肉 【科室】:南站附近小区,交通便利,不偏。门禁宽松 【优点/优势】服务,态度,骚在这个价位,我愿称之为最强。不愧是王牌。颜值中上。补充下胸是b。后背有一点纹身,但不影响曹感 【缺点/建议】可能不好约了 【过程】:老师未来之前,就听说是美少女的王牌。于是果断约了。首先按照指引来到老师教室。进门后便发现妆容精致的老师站于面前。老师态度ok,给我送上开门大蟒蛇,缠绵良久,帮我脱衣服,再来个开门口,口的非常细心,令我很是惊讶😲。差不多,替我脱完衣服,一起洗澡。鸳鸯浴很有特色会从后面勾搭人,先是背面水墨,再是正面简单摸下。再来浴室口,浴室大蟒蛇。差不多进入卧室让我选…

14 Nov 2026, 00:43 UTC213 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

时间:2026-11-13 老师:米洛蒂 留名:FatSir 【📖基础评分】 人照:9.5 气质:9 身材:8.8 服务和态度:10 性价比:9.5 环境评分:8.5 ◉综合平均分:9.22 【硬件】:颜值高,情绪价值给的很足,服务顶级能给的基本都给,骚浪贱。 【科室】:托乐嘉老小区,距离地铁站300多米,小区无门禁,进出非常方便。 【优点/优势】原味鸡,口活顶,皮肤道具全满足你的所有幻想,口活毒龙,擦枪都很绝,让你灵魂颤栗。 【缺点/建议】无 【过程】:按指引进门,老师穿着高跟,情趣制服,性感小内内迎接,毫无生疏感,还没交水费,老师扒开裤子就口了起来,口活很轻,口里很锁,毫无齿感,还时不时用眼神嘌你,嗦了几分钟原味鸡,脱衣付水费,洗漱。老师用奶子打沐浴液,手从跨间伸过来套鸡鸡,水中萧……擦干上床,毒龙起手,老师毒龙时间长覆盖全,毒龙刺激的本狼鸡鸡硬邦邦。胯下萧,正面口,无套擦枪……后入……传教士……侧入……出货。躺床上按…

14 Nov 2026, 00:43 UTC203 viewsread 14 November 2026

时间:2026-11-13 老师:米洛蒂 留名:TK 【📖基础评分】 人照:10 气质:10 身材:10 服务和态度:10 性价比:10 环境评分:10 ◉综合平均分:10 【硬件】:老师人照基本一致,看起来24,5岁左右,颜值颇高,妆容精致,身材苗条,胸B左右,掌中宝,无毛白虎好评,穿着黑丝显得腿部十分美好,黄肤光滑细腻,摸起来手感不错。 【科室】:老师课室位于翠屏山附近小区,安全性很好,房间很大,床也很大很舒适,有一次性床单,一面落地镜立在窗前,增加了很多情趣。 【优点/优势】深杭来宁支教老师,软硬件条件都比较出众。优点:骚,很骚,非常骚的御姐。妆容精致,眼神杀人,魅惑值拉满,情绪价值拉满,全过程满格投入,不敷衍,让你完全沉浸在美好的肉体里无法自拔,爽感直冲天灵盖。各种姿势都很配合,性格开朗爱聊天,女友感满满。缺点:情人眼里出西施,暂未发现缺点。 【缺点/建议】暂无 【过程】:关注米洛蒂老师的频道好久了,之前在杭州阴差…

12 Nov 2026, 16:37 UTC459 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

时间:2026-11-13 老师:哆米 留名:JohnH 【📖基础评分】 人照:9.8 气质:9.8 身材:9 服务和态度:9.8 性价比:10 环境评分:9.5 ◉综合平均分:9.65 【硬件】:身形娇小可爱,脸明媚动人,身材保持良好 【科室】:浦口某小区很好找 【优点/优势】服务态度很好,环境也好,性价比也非常高 【缺点/建议】老师服务的流程比较简短,毕竟新开,胸部有些下垂,不过无伤大雅 【过程】:我是武将不善言辞,进门交水费,然后浴室洗漱,写完老师帮我擦干,老师开始服务,b面简单指滑,如此这些,然后口硬了开始做。现在是老师在上,紧的让我有点受不了,赶紧换成传教式姿势,后渐入佳境,又换后入式,体力有所欠缺,简单冲刺结束战斗。期间老师十分配合,主动引导,实在是良师。 此报告认证审核由:南京比奇堡 各花入各眼,何必强求人人懂,报告仅供参考,不合适掉头跑路

12 Nov 2026, 16:36 UTC389 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

时间:2026-11-12 老师:苍井空 留名:克里斯关下门 【📖基础评分】 人照:8 气质:7 身材:7.5 服务和态度:10 性价比:8 环境评分:8 ◉综合平均分:8.08 【硬件】:身材匀称,颜值中等 【科室】:拆迁小区,无门禁 【优点/优势】服务挺好,白虎,会夹 【缺点/建议】 【过程】:这是第三次了,约好时间上门,交完水费,ls主动陪浴水中萧挺舒服的,课表的项目体验了一遍,戴t开干,ls白虎穴紧包裹感可以,中途换了几个姿势反馈,挺真实的,最后后入出水 此报告认证审核由:南京比奇堡 各花入各眼,何必强求人人懂,报告仅供参考,不合适掉头跑路

❤1

12 Nov 2026, 16:35 UTC340 viewsread 14 November 2026

时间:2026-11-09 老师:园涵 留名:匿名 【📖基础评分】 人照:9.7 气质:9.2 身材:9 服务和态度:9.2 性价比:9.2 环境评分:8.9 ◉综合平均分:9.2 【硬件】:人照9.9,大蜜脸蛋,大蜜气质与身材。170以上身高,丰乳肥臀。真熊 【科室】:建邺高档小区,交通便利门禁轻松进入。有庭院,白天还是很好找。。仅东门可以进出 【优点/优势】身材赞,手感好 【缺点/建议】 【过程】:约定晚上的课程。遥控上门。打开门后。满意的付了茶水费。洗了澡。进入科室进行服务。老师早已身穿黑丝袜,裸着上身。从我的胸开始服务,先是舔舐尖尖,再是慢慢往下。然后往下开始口牛牛。品棍身,品蛋蛋,同时用她的巨乳冲击我的大腿两侧。口了良久,再看了我一眼用她的巨乳给我乳交,真舒服。差不多了,带上套套进入老师的身体,先是传教,然后后入。可惜今天状态不佳,但老师很耐心地继续下来,老师尽力了,最终草草结束。 此报告认证审核由:南京比奇堡…

12 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC374 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026

时间:2026-11-12 老师:水水 留名:Tim 【📖基础评分】 人照:9 气质:9 身材:9 服务和态度:9.5 性价比:10 环境评分:9 ◉综合平均分:9.25 【硬件】:大长腿,身材好 【科室】:干净整洁,氛围感好 【优点/优势】人美声甜,情绪价值高 【缺点/建议】 【过程】:挑选了一个好日子预约了哆米,谁成想时间不凑巧,不过老师热情似火说是与我聊天很有感觉决定为我加班一下,也是非常开心,与老师聊天一下午,谁知走错门了,也是一波三折来到了课室,一进门看到哆米宝宝果然没有让人失望,黑丝高跟鞋包臀裙套装十分性感,简单寒暄又看到了里面的水水宝宝,哇超绝大长腿加黑丝也是性感程度拉满,一进门就开始左拥右抱享受帝王服务,先是水水宝宝为我洗澡,打好沐浴液就开始从上到下滑,很是舒服鸡鸡也是马上起立,水宝宝赶快蹲下将其含入口中,展现精湛的舌技,还会含入热水为我口,真是血脉喷张,洗漱完毕哆米宝宝为我擦干身子,我迫不及待的蛇起来,女…

❤1

12 Nov 2026, 11:33 UTC326 viewsread 14 November 2026

时间:2026-11-12 老师:哆米 留名:Tim 【📖基础评分】 人照:9 气质:9 身材:9 服务和态度:9.5 性价比:10 环境评分:9 ◉综合平均分:9.25 【硬件】:身材不错,老师也很漂亮 【科室】:科室环境干净整洁,氛围感十足 【优点/优势】服务态度非常好,情绪价值高,人美声甜 【缺点/建议】 【过程】:挑选了一个好日子预约了哆米,谁成想时间不凑巧,不过老师热情似火说是与我聊天很有感觉决定为我加班一下,也是非常开心,与老师聊天一下午,谁知走错门了,也是一波三折来到了课室,一进门看到哆米宝宝果然没有让人失望,黑丝高跟鞋包臀裙套装十分性感,简单寒暄又看到了里面的水水宝宝,哇超绝大长腿加黑丝也是性感程度拉满,一进门就开始左拥右抱享受帝王服务,先是水水宝宝为我洗澡,打好沐浴液就开始从上到下滑,很是舒服鸡鸡也是马上起立,水宝宝赶快蹲下将其含入口中,展现精湛的舌技,还会含入热水为我口,真是血脉喷张,洗漱完毕哆米宝宝为…

12 Nov 2026, 11:25 UTC300 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

时间:2026-11-12 老师:哆米 留名:匿名 【📖基础评分】 人照:9 气质:8 身材:7.5 服务和态度:9 性价比:8.5 环境评分:10 ◉综合平均分:8.67 【硬件】:老师颜值不错的 至少化完妆以后和照片基本一致,身高大概在1米6左右,胸和屁股都不小 【科室】:三姐妹的客室环境都超级好,打扫得很干净,是居民楼,也不需要刷卡,很方便 【优点/优势】颜值不错 人照一致。加入老师的私人群,签到水水积分兑换完优惠券,性价比很高 【缺点/建议】皮肤有一点松弛 年龄偏大了一点 30不到吧 课室虽然很安全 但是三姐妹住在一栋楼 总归还是有隐患的 【过程】:浦口三姐妹的口碑在外,也很早就加入了老师的群,但是哆米一直没有机会,总要集齐最后一张卡片的。最近老师红休结束,第一时间约好出发。进门一看,老师的环境收拾得真的好干净,老师本人也很干净清爽,风骚少妇一只,穿着一套情趣内衣,一对酥胸若隐若出,看得我小弟弟直接硬了。脱衣洗澡,…

12 Nov 2026, 07:43 UTC325 views2 reactionsread 14 November 2026

时间:2026-11-12 老师:惠子 留名:江南女仆联盟(有事看简介问客服) 【📖基础评分】 人照:9 气质:9 身材:9 服务和态度:9 性价比:8 环境评分:9 ◉综合平均分:8.83 【硬件】:个高腿长细枝硕果,微科技,假胸 【科室】:日租公寓。非热门景点,环境不错,三室一厅 【优点/优势】人美,健身要细屁股翘。情绪价值拉满,很会哄人 【缺点/建议】唯一缺点假胸 【过程】:一直被鲁鲁修安利惠子,但是这个照片我真不喜欢。但是最近确实没有好菜吃了,还是决定跑去看看,真人跟照片有点差距,但是本人比照片好看太多了,是怕家里人认出来,估计批的有点丑。这颜值12张绝对值得。身材相当好,女友感拉满了。一直宝贝长宝贝短的叫个不停,会一直说爱你吆。背面服务也会做一些,标准秘书感很强,穿白衬衫➕丝袜,立刻硬了,做的反馈感很强。爱了,值得复刷。 此报告认证审核由:南京比奇堡 各花入各眼,何必强求人人懂,报告仅供参考,不合适掉头跑路

❤2

12 Nov 2026, 07:42 UTC281 viewsread 14 November 2026

🥇拔得头筹 时间:2026-11-12 老师:子钰 留名:江南女仆联盟(有事看简介问客服) 【📖基础评分】 人照:8 气质:7.5 身材:8.5 服务和态度:9.5 性价比:7.5 环境评分:9 ◉综合平均分:8.33 【硬件】:胸大屁股大 骚 【科室】:老小区新装修,外面破,里面很好,很温馨。 【优点/优势】态度好。情绪价值好。骚话多。服务也不错 【缺点/建议】颜值低了点,所以性价比不高 【过程】:如约到达老师科室,本人会比照片好看一点,但是也不是颜值系,穿的特别骚,大奶奶很顶,洗澡的时候也特别骚,一直在用胸和屁股给我打沐浴露。床上有背面服务,胸推特别赞。老公哥哥叫个不停,让人欲望停不下来。左爱反馈特别好,会吸会夹。 此报告认证审核由:南京比奇堡 各花入各眼,何必强求人人懂,报告仅供参考,不合适掉头跑路

Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @cjddbg124. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @cjddbg124 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“泡芙女士的驾驶室(报告频道)” (@cjddbg124), 6,745 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cjddbg124.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.