Civil Engineering pinned a photo

Channel
Civil Engineering
@civil_Engineering_M
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,266subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001836129457 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @civil_Engineering_M |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/civil_Engineering_M |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 3,266 | +5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 3,261 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 3,259 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 3,256 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 3,255 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 3,254 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 3,253 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 3,257 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 3,252 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 3,246 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 3,246 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
72 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 81.9% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 11.1% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 17 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
جانب من المخططات الانشائية ل portal frame ENG:Mohammed Haider
❤8
Civil Engineering pinned Deleted message
Civil Engineering pinned a file
Civil Engineering pinned «STEEL STRUCTURE DESIGN COURSE باستخدام برنامج Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis انضم إلى كورس عملي شامل يغطي مشاريع حقيقية من الواقع محاور الكورس: 🔹 شرح كامل لواجهة البرنامج وجميع الأوامر 🔹 تعريف المقاطع والمواد حسب الأسواق العراقية 🔹 تصميم Portal Frame…»
محتويات الكورس بشكل تفصيلي 👆🏻
❤2💯2
STEEL STRUCTURE DESIGN COURSE باستخدام برنامج Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis انضم إلى كورس عملي شامل يغطي مشاريع حقيقية من الواقع محاور الكورس: 🔹 شرح كامل لواجهة البرنامج وجميع الأوامر 🔹 تعريف المقاطع والمواد حسب الأسواق العراقية 🔹 تصميم Portal Frame (الجملونات الصناعية) 🔹 تصميم Gas Station 🔹 نمذجة وتصميم بناية متعددة الطوابق 🔹 تصميم الوصلات المعدنية (Steel Connections) 🔹 إخراج المخططات التنفيذية (Shop Drawings…
❤2
#مهم_جداً في بعض المشاريع يتم رفع قيمة fy لحديد التسليح (مثلاً استخدام 500 أو 600 MPa) دون الالتزام بمحددات كود ACI 318، ظنًّا أن ذلك أكثر أماناً أو اقتصادياً، لكن هذا الإجراء قد يكون خطيراً إنشائياً. لماذا الكود يحدد fy؟ الكود لا يحدد fy فقط على أساس المقاومة، بل يربطها بـ: • المطيلية (Ductility) • سلوك الفشل • قابلية إعادة توزيع العزوم • متطلبات التفصيل (Detailing) التأثيرات السلبية لزيادة fy دون ضبط: • انخ…
❤15
Signed ENG:Mohammed Haider
Civil Engineering pinned a photo
هل تعلم أن هناك معادلة متداولة في ACI منسوبة إلى مهندس عراقي؟ يُطلق الكثير من المهندسين في العراق والدول العربية اسم “معادلة الصرّاف – Sarraf Equation” على إحدى علاقات الانفعال المستخدمة في التصميم الإنشائي للخرسانة المسلحة حسب الكود الأمريكي ACI، نسبةً إلى الأستاذ العراقي المعروف د. عبد الوهاب الصرّاف. 🔹 المعادلة ليست مكتوبة داخل كود ACI باسم شخص معيّن، لأن الكود الأمريكي لا ينسب المعادلات إلى أفراد، لكن تسمية “مع…
❤16🙏4🔥1
Signed ENG:Mohammed Haider
Civil Engineering pinned a photo
إعلان دورة مجانية لتصميم بناية متعددة الطوابق وفق الكود الأمريكي ACI 318 يسرّنا الإعلان عن إطلاق كورس مجاني احترافي لتصميم بناية متعددة الطوابق باستخدام الكود الأمريكي ACI 318-19 و ACI 318-11، مع شرح تفصيلي لكل خطوة تصميمية بطريقة مبسّطة ومناسبة للمهندسين وطلبة الهندسة المدنية. محتوى الكورس تصميم العناصر الإنشائية (الأعمدة – الكمرات – الأسس – الجدران القصّية – البلاطات). شرح شامل لمتطلبات الكود الأمريكي ACI. خط…
❤8🙏4
Signed ENG:Mohammed Gazay
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @civil_Engineering_M. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@EAT_2030 · 36,250
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Civil Engineering” (@civil_Engineering_M), 3,266 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/civil_Engineering_M.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.