Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Civil 3D Expert

@civil3dexpert

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,543subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001071803986
TypeChannel
Username@civil3dexpert
Created9 December 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/civil3dexpert

Growth

3,5273,5433,5357 August 2026 — 3,527 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,528 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,532 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,543 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,525–3,545 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:033,543+11
11 Aug 2026, 13:153,532+4
8 Aug 2026, 03:263,528+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:173,527first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 3,543 subscribers
Avg views / post
595
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 April 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,190
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

331 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9629.0%
👍9227.8%
7923.9%
💯216.34%
😁144.23%
🤩144.23%
51.51%
🤔51.51%
❤‍🔥20.604%
👌20.604%
🏆10.302%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @civil3dexpert. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC423 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Чем больше разбираюсь с функционалом PikTools, тем больше меня впечатляет уровень интеграции и качество проработки поддерживающей экосистемы. Высокий уровень интеграции для меня означает, что команда BIMTeam не просто строит свою систему на автокадовском ядре (это путь, по которому часто идут другие разработчики, иногда сильно дублируя имеющийся в Civil 3D функционал), а грамотно использует именно сущности Civil 3D и

👍10

Signed Alla Zemlyanskaya

3 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC767 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На InfraBIM.Pro вышел новый потрясающий курс — Мелиорация в Civil 3D. Всегда кайфую, когда появляются узкоспециализированные курсы по Civil 3D. Великое преимущество этого софта в том, что сам по себе он не заточен ни под какую сферу проектирования (в этом же и его главная слабость, по мнению некоторых пользователей). Civil 3D — это большая инженерная платформа для линейных объектов. Если понимать её архитектуру, то

11🔥5👍1

Signed Alla Zemlyanskaya

2 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC≈2,900 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вышел CivilConnection 8.0 — пакет для Dynamo, который связывает Revit и Civil 3D и позволяет забирать в Revit данные из Civil 3D: трассы, поверхности, коридоры, геометрию и другие специфические инфраструктурные элементы. Главное в этом релизе — полная переработка архитектуры, она стала сервис-ориентированной, внутри появились как бы такие специальные службы для работы с Civil 3D: AlignmentService, CorridorService, B

👍10🔥63

Signed Alla Zemlyanskaya

1 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC≈1,660 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

После небольшого вынужденного перерыва в проекте по распаковке PikTools Генплан планирую вернуться к регулярным постам, у меня ещё в плане несколько разобрать несколько тем. Уже выходили посты: Про 3D-модель + IFC по стандартам Москвы Про состав пакета (какие есть модули) и зачем нужен Family Manager Про вертикалку Про модуль Озеленение Хочу свериться с вами, касатики, может, стоит поменять формат? Мне привычно и у

🔥121

Signed Alla Zemlyanskaya

26 Jun 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 7 August 2026

Лайфхак от магистра @drakon_v_tapkax

Signed Alla Zemlyanskaya

26 Jun 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,780 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @hydro_modelingPhoto

Внимание: информация очень узкоспециализированная по Civil 3d, но поможет избежать кучи головняка. 😂 Бывает так, что из tin-поверхности надо выдавить solid. (например для переноса в расчетные комплексы) Оригинальная триангуляция при этом может быть дико неоднородной и 3d тело банально может не выдавиться.🤷‍♂️ Еще хуже, если solid надо выдавить между двумя поверхностями, которые имеют разные фактуры триангуляции.

👍8🔥8🤔2

Signed Alla Zemlyanskaya

14 Jun 2026, 04:07 UTC≈2,100 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @yabramoveVideo

Всем привет! Разработал небольшой Dynamo-скрипт для Civil 3D по массовому изменению отметок характерных линий и профилей. Пригодится, когда нужно быстро сместить площадку или другой объект на заданную величину без ручного редактирования отметок. Для работы достаточно открыть скрипт через Проигрыватель Dynamo (вкладка Управление), выбрать объекты и указать величину смещения. Буду рад обратной связи! https://dis

9👍5

Signed Alla Zemlyanskaya

14 Jun 2026, 04:07 UTC≈1,910 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Полезный скрипт от Ярослава Абрамова Да, да, это он в битве Robur vs. Civil 3D был за Робур)

😁1

Signed Alla Zemlyanskaya

13 Jun 2026, 21:11 UTC≈1,820 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Исторический момент: прощаюсь с 2023 Кстати, снести Civil 3D с компа — отдельное искусство и отдельный порядок. А кому-то нужно напомнить инструкцию по чистому удалению?

💯21🔥6👍5😁5

Signed Alla Zemlyanskaya

11 Jun 2026, 14:43 UTC≈1,950 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня у нас очередной четверг, значит, выходит новая серия моего сериала про PikTools ГП. Сегодня эпизод про модуль Озеленение. Запрос бесплатной триальной версии здесь. Этот эпизод я полностью переписала, потому что два дня назад состоялся Большой BIM Просвет, насквозь пропитанный ИИ и вайбкодингом. Они (ИИ и вайбкодинг) знатно вскружили голову опытным бимщикам, потому что позволяют решать множество задач от авто

6👍4🔥2

Signed Alla Zemlyanskaya

21 May 2026, 08:20 UTC≈2,430 views19 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Потестила повнимательнее инструмент Генератор проездов из модуля Вертикалка, делюсь впечатлением. Теория в двух словах Генератор проездов — плагин для генерации характерных линий с динамической зависимостью от оси проезда. Общий сценарий проектирования: 1️⃣Начертить оси проездов обычными полилиниями. То, что вы и так делаете и у вас это скорее всего уже есть. 2️⃣Создать из этих полилиний характерные линии, чтобы по

🔥113👍3👌2

Signed Alla Zemlyanskaya

19 May 2026, 06:35 UTC≈2,320 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пока светлые головы на конференции ЦИПР в Нижнем Новгороде обсуждают стратегии цифрового развития и импортозамещения, мы окунаемся в тактику и разбираем инженерную практику с конкретными техническими приёмами. Завтра хочу посмотреть вебинар от Нормасофт "Переход с AutoCAD Civil 3D на nanoCAD GeoniCS — импортозамещаемся правильно" 📌Дата 20 мая ⏰Время 11:00 мск 🔗Регистрация Программа вебинара от эксперта Анастасии Д

5😁53🤔3👍2

Signed Alla Zemlyanskaya

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @civil3dexpert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 418,644 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Civil 3D Expert” (@civil3dexpert), 3,543 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/civil3dexpert.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.