4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 9,242β9,267 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 02:35
9,245
-11
10 Aug 2026, 02:25
9,256
-8
7 Aug 2026, 03:45
9,264
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:48
9,264
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
39.2%
avg views Γ· 9,245 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,620
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held
18 (28 May 2026 β 1 August 2026)
Views total
10,870
Reactions total
274
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,824 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
π
988
54.2%
π
371
20.3%
β€
365
20.0%
π€―
64
3.51%
π
36
1.97%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,824reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
103
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for Β· 11%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @cioccolanti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
AUGUST is a month of great signs: From a bright comet and stunning planetary encounters to a total solar eclipse, the Perseids, and a lunar eclipse, this month is packed with celestial codes and signs in the sky.
βοΈ August 2 β Comet 10P/Tempel 2 reaches perihelion and becomes a great binocular target.
πͺ August 3 β The Moon passes close to Saturn.
β August 4 β Venus shines between Regulus and Spica.
π΄ August 9 β A clβ¦
This must have been coordinated by the LORD.
The launch of MPG EUROPE is happening the exact same time as I will be in Europe. We did not consult each other, take it as DIVINE TIMING.
If you know anyone in Europe, the whole continent is your oyster. Before the BLACK HORSE comes, people will need to restore their health and have a side gig that's preferrably online. Please don't say I didn't tell you so when the nexβ¦
1st EUROPEAN PROPHECY SUMMIT & European TOUR CLOSING IN 3 DAYS: π Zurich, Geneva, Slovenia... What is Coming Upon the Earth?
We are entering a pivotal prophetic seasonβnot just for Europe, but for the entire globe. God is calling strategic leaders to look beyond the chaos and prepare for what is coming...
This August, pull back the curtain on current world events with Pastor Steve Cioccolanti in Europe. Ground yourβ¦
Tomorrow Iβll help some friends with an overview of the Breakthrough Technologies for Your Wellness & Investment.
You can help others Break Free from Poor Health and Financial Stress.
Join me for a special live Zoom tomorrow (in ~25 hours)
Discover whatβs changing lives around the world! Your next 12 months donβt have to look like your last 12 months.
π Friday, June 26 (USA)
β’ 7:00 PM Pacific (PDT)
β’ 9:00 PM Cenβ¦
UK Police arrest a white dad trying to rescue his daughter kidnapped by Pakistani grooming gangs. You are witnessing extreme distortion of justice in UK and Western Europe.
Theyβre no longer safe places in the end times. Even my 6 year old says the arrests of Christians and white people defending themselves is stupid.
Come find a Goshen where thereβs never been a religious riot, racial war or famine. Prices go up oβ¦
TRUMP at G7 in France (ironic location) announces Weak MOU with IRAN | Is the Strait of Hormuz Trumpβs Waterloo? | RED HORSE of War Timeline CONFIRMED
https://youtu.be/vX822AkKTs0
π54π17β€3π3π€―3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cioccolanti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 364,827 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
Amir Tsarfati @beholdisraelchannel Β· 580,941 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 87 here β alongside 86 others β read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βSteve Cioccolanti π¦πΊπΊπΈ Discover Churchβ (@cioccolanti), 9,245 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cioccolanti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.