Размышления о кино всех стран и мастей, «а также кроссворды и колонка юмора». Спойлеров, кинокритики и объективности здесь нет.
Это я – @sk1pisfabulous
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42–44 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 16:45
43
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:00
43
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
59.2%
avg views ÷ 43 subscribers
Avg views / post
25.5
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
20 (8 July 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
382
Reactions total
61
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,280
Videos
≈21
Links
≈254
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
89 reactions across 19 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
22
24.7%
custom 5343556984060788807
7
7.87%
❤
7
7.87%
✍
5
5.62%
🔥
5
5.62%
😁
5
5.62%
👨💻
4
4.49%
💯
4
4.49%
😢
4
4.49%
🤣
4
4.49%
👌
3
3.37%
🤝
3
3.37%
🫡
3
3.37%
🆒
2
2.25%
🌭
2
2.25%
🙏
2
2.25%
custom 5343824886940844639
1
1.12%
custom 5402109663321794962
1
1.12%
custom 5402182063585502082
1
1.12%
🍾
1
1.12%
3 further kinds
3
3.37%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Чё-то мне не очень понравились «Типа крутые легавые». И сказать про них мне особо нечего, кроме того, что это было в основном скучно и изредка смешно. Да, химия между Саймоном Пеггом и Ником Фростом до сих пор кажется лучшей в британской комедии. Да, россыпь крутых актёров здесь не выглядит капустником. Да, Эдгар Райт крутой режиссёр – его «Зомби по имени Шон» великое кино. Но вот «Типа крутые легавые» то и дело меня…
Впервые посмотрел «Человека с бульвара Капуцинов» и удивился тому, насколько это на самом деле серьёзное произведение. Настоящее, чистокровное травести (и переодевания тут ни при чём).
Недаром, как я узнал из Википедии, постер фильма пародирует «Сикстинскую Мадонну» Рафаэля. Сюжет о мистере Фёсте является переложением библейского описания жизни Христа. По Алле Суриковой, Мессия несёт добро и любовь, проповедуя посре…
Давно хотел посмотреть «Хористов», живущих в топе Кинопоиска, кажется, с момента выхода.
Классное, доброе и невероятно простое кино, построенное по принципу «Титаника», «Дневника памяти» и всех остальных картин-воспоминаний. Глаза на мокром месте держит постоянно – концентрация детского горя и неприкаянности, скрытых за хулиганскими выходками, не даёт расслабиться. Но есть и проблемы. На мой взгляд, например, директ…
Посмотрев «Короткий фильм об убийстве», я был в замешательстве. Это настолько отстранённый и непроницаемый фильм, что непонятно, что вообще можно о нём сказать.
Ну, я и полез в Википедию. Оказывается, режиссёр Кшиштоф Кесьлёвский и сам особо ничего не рассказывал о своём творении. Для него это кино про то, как молодой парень зачем-то убивает таксиста, а потом за это система убивает его. Ровно это в ленте и происходи…
Каждый новый фильм Кристофера Нолана для меня – праздник. Оно и неудивительно: его «Начало» показало мне, каким масштабным и сложноустроенным может быть кино, а «Интерстеллар» научил это кино любить. И вот вчера я посмотрел «Одиссею». Ниже – моё самое предвзятое и пристрастное о ней мнение.
Мне кажется, где-нибудь к концу 2026-го должен быть зафиксирован рекорд по самой долгой непрерывной рекламной кампании фильма. …
В возрасте 50 лет умер французский диджей Kavinsky.
Именно он был автором иконического трека Nightcall, использованного Николасом Виндингом Рейном в «Драйве».
Одно время писал тут про якутское кино, но потом чего-то перестал. Возобновляю: фильм Любови Борисовой «Не хороните меня без Ивана».
Это история по реальным мотивам о якуте Степане, жившем 100 лет назад и время от времени впадавшем в «летаргический сон». Помочь ему с недугом, а также покровительствовать в целом берётся Иван Попов, художник и этнограф, собирающий культурные памятники региона.
«Не хороните меня без И…
Полюбить кино Джима Джармуша – попытка №7.
Пришла пора крамольных заявлений, ведь речь пойдёт про «Мертвеца» – наверное, самый известный и самый любимый фанатами фильм Джармуша. Об этой картине, как говорится, либо хорошо, либо никак. И всё же...
Прочитав книгу о творчестве Джима Джармуша, я вдруг понял, что может быть причиной, по которой мне не всегда нравится его кино. Этот режиссёр невероятно любознателен, насм…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cinemastandpoints. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cinema Standpoints” (@cinemastandpoints), 43 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cinemastandpoints.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
