Channel
@cineflicks_org
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
731subscribers
-142 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002214097317 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cineflicks_org |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cineflicks_org |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 09:17 | 731 | -10 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 20:21 | 741 | -30 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 771 | -14 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 785 | -26 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 811 | -8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 819 | -33 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 852 | -19 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 871 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 873 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 873 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,089 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 855 | 78.5% | |
| 👍 | 152 | 14.0% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 5.05% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 1.10% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 0.735% | |
| 🤗 | 4 | 0.367% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.275% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,089 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2024 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Streaming platforms changed entertainment forever. But one thing never changed. Viewers are still just consumers. Cineflicks is exploring a different model where audiences can participate in the ecosystem they spend hours in.
❤4
Jameel Mamu ki baat toh manni padegi baccha.
❤1
Entertainment platforms have stayed the same for years. Viewers spend hours watching content, yet their role ends at the play button. Cineflicks is being built to change that. This video explains the problem with today’s entertainment platforms and the idea behind what we are building. Cineflicks presale is now live. Join while the early round is open: https://cineflicks.io/
❤1
Eid Mubarak from all of us at Cineflicks. Wishing you a wonderful day filled with happiness, togetherness, and great moments with the people who matter most.
Entertainment platforms have stayed the same for years. Cineflicks is trying something different. Here is a quick explainer of what we are building and how the platform works.
Today marks an important milestone for Cineflicks. The first round of the Cineflicks ICO goes live today at 12 PM. A lot of work has gone into reaching this stage and this is just the beginning of what the team has been building.
You may have noticed that Cineflicks has been quiet here for the past few months. During this time the team has been fully focused on development, product testing, and a few key collaborations that will be announced soon. Building the foundation of the platform required time and attention behind the scenes. Now that progress has been made on multiple fronts, we’re back here to share the journey with you. More upd…
Hey Flickers! We just announced the zealy winners from week 4 of our campaign. Click the link below to see if you made it to the list. https://x.com/cineflicksorg/status/1881690712753742183?s=61
🔥27❤8
Hey Flickers! We just announced the zealy winners from week 1-3 of our campaign. Click the link below to see if you made it to the list. https://x.com/cineflicksorg/status/1878003155905995105?s=61
👍124🔥5🥰4
Hey Flickers! We’ve been hearing all your questions about the Zealy winners—don’t worry, we aren’t keeping quiet. We’ve been working hard on the back end, and now it’s time for the big reveal. By tomorrow, we’ll announce the Zealy weekly winners for the past three weeks. 🏆 Yes Flickers, the wait is almost over. And moving forward, we’re making things even more exciting. We’ll be introducing weekly sprints, and at …
❤104👍6👏4🥰2
🎥✨ Happy New Year from Cineflicks! ✨🎥 As we roll the credits on 2024, we want to thank you for being part of our journey. Here’s to a new year filled with more movies, unforgettable stories, and endless entertainment! Let’s make 2025 a blockbuster year together! 🍿🎬
❤147👍8🤗4🤝3
Good Morning Flickers Merry Christmas to you and yours. May your day be filled with Joy, Love and a little time to catch a favourite holiday movie. What’s your go-to Christmas classic?
❤429👍11🔥6👏4🥰4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cineflicks_org. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cineflicks” (@cineflicks_org), 731 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cineflicks_org.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.