Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 【BTC-ETH】行情策略分析 🇨🇳

Channel

【BTC-ETH】行情策略分析 🇨🇳

@cige77887

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,047subscribers

-339 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002377094013
TypeChannel
Username@cige77887
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cige77887

Growth

3,0473,3863,216.57 August 2026 — 3,386 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,382 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,300 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,248 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,182 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,146 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,140 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,133 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,091 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,065 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,047 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net -339. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,996–3,437 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 08:413,047-18
2 Sept 2026, 13:473,065-26
30 Aug 2026, 07:363,091-42
27 Aug 2026, 15:123,133-7
24 Aug 2026, 12:093,140-6
20 Aug 2026, 22:083,146-36
17 Aug 2026, 15:383,182-66
14 Aug 2026, 08:263,248-52
11 Aug 2026, 01:363,300-82
7 Aug 2026, 21:323,382-4
7 Aug 2026, 16:163,386first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

623 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥16626.6%
16125.8%
🎉15825.4%
👍13822.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 623 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC53 views137 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

体验群、会员群同步策略 本周社区圆满0止损结束 八月份,依旧雄起状态🇨🇳

🎉36👍35🔥3432

3 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,600 views150 reactionsread 7 August 2026

策略细节发布-跟进-总结,频道上方都有记录,支持查验😎 可体验、长期合作下方联系 试单体验 👉 免费试单群 跟单咨询👉 Crypto赐哥 备用联系👉 CG赐哥

46🔥43🎉34👍27

3 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,580 views143 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

6.29-7.31社区会员策略统计(月) * 统计策略:72单 * 有效率:75% * 盈利率:39单55% * 保本率:11单15% * 亏损率:4单 5% * 总胜率:90% 社区主打《高空低多限价》短线衍变中长策略-配合市价趋势单少而稳准;

47🔥35👍33🎉28

3 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC165 views92 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

八月首开旗胜,完成开门红🎉 七月胜率战绩不菲,八月延续🤏

🎉30🔥27👍2312

31 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC241 views101 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

社区再次高空低多行情捕捉 七月高度胜率,圆满成功🏆 专注稳定盈利,数据真实可查 策略的连续性与稳定性持续得到验证。

🎉30🔥2724👍20

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @cige77887. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“【BTC-ETH】行情策略分析 🇨🇳” (@cige77887), 3,047 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cige77887.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.