Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ciara

Channel

Ciara

@ciara52

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

790subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001241980541
TypeChannel
Username@ciara52
Created9 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ciara52

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7907967937 August 2026 — 792 subscribers8 August 2026 — 792 subscribers15 August 2026 — 795 subscribers22 August 2026 — 793 subscribers30 August 2026 — 796 subscribers8 September 2026 — 794 subscribers15 September 2026 — 792 subscribers27 September 2026 — 791 subscribers7 October 2026 — 790 subscribers7 August 20267 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 61 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 789–797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 14:37790-1
27 Sept 2026, 13:01791-1
15 Sept 2026, 02:38792-2
8 Sept 2026, 08:42794-2
30 Aug 2026, 16:46796+3
22 Aug 2026, 18:39793-2
15 Aug 2026, 00:57795+3
8 Aug 2026, 01:45792no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:48792first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34m 16s
Average length
5m 43s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1246.2%
👍726.9%
🔥519.2%
😐13.85%
😱13.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC91 viewsread 8 August 2026

🇺🇸🚨‼️ | El gobernador de Florida, Ron DeSantis, respaldó públicamente a Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tras su tenso intercambio con una periodista de CNN, y criticó el papel que, a su juicio, desempeñaron los grandes medios durante la pandemia. "RFK tenía razón al llamar la atención a CNN. Los medios tradicionales le dieron a Fauci un poder informal absurdo. Cualquier edicto suyo se convertía en 'ciencia' en todos los canal…

3 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC114 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Analisen 👇 EL TERCER TEMPLO BIOLÓGICO 1. LA GRAN CONFUSIÓN DEL TERCER TEMPLO: ¿Y si el Anticristo no viene a construir un templo de piedra en Jerusalén porque el verdadero Templo ya está construido? Olvídate de los ladrillos y la diplomacia tradicional. Las profecías bíblicas podrían estar cumpliéndose hoy, pero no en el Medio Oriente, sino dentro de los laboratorios de biotecnología. Durante siglos, teólogos y es…

❤1

3 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC116 viewsread 8 August 2026

El gran engaño no es que nos obliguen a adorar a un falso dios... es que la humanidad lo hará voluntariamente por admiración y gratitud, entregando el templo de su mente a la máquina.

2 Aug 2026, 00:14 UTC151 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

La Tablilla Sumeria que dice que Enki descubrió que los Humanos tenian (Algo) que los "dioses" perdieron. /Repito lo que simpre dije,.. Los Anunakis nunca nos crearon! Lo que si hicieron fue meter mano en nuestra genetica o ADN para modificarnos ya que eramos mas puros que ellos. En la tablillas dicen que ellos descendieron del cielo y cuando lo hicieron ya habia humanos en la tierra! ¿Por que no tenian Alma? Por q…

❤2👍1

1 Aug 2026, 22:38 UTC137 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

¿Y SI EL PRIMER CLON FUE ADÁN? Durante miles de años nos han contado que Adán fue el primer hombre. Pero, si lees el Génesis con atención, eso no es exactamente lo que dice. Adán no nació. No tuvo padres, ni infancia, ni un árbol genealógico que se remontara a generaciones anteriores. Simplemente apareció, creado de forma deliberada antes de que Eva fuera formada a partir de una de sus costillas. Creas o no que el Gé…

❤1👍1

30 Jul 2026, 00:44 UTC205 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

A Lutero no le gustó la Iglesia Católica y fundó la iglesia Luterana. A Calvino no le gustó la iglesia Luterana y fundó la iglesia Reformada o Calvinista. A Enrique VIII no le gustó que le negaran su matrimonio católico y fundó la Iglesia Anglicana. A John Smith no le gustó la iglesia Anglicana y fundó la iglesia bautista. A William Miller no le gustó la iglesia Bautista y fundó la iglesia Adventista. A Ellen G White…

👍4🔥1😐1

23 Jul 2026, 00:36 UTC286 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Es tiempo de recordar lo que muamar el gadafi dijo alguna vez... Este año la portada de the economist ha estado asociada con un sin fin de eventos que ocurren en la vida real, según estás teorías los símbolos que aparecen en la portada anuncian los eventos más importantes que ocurrirán este año, como si todo ya estuviera planeado.

🔥3❤1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ciara52. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ciara” (@ciara52), 790 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ciara52.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.