Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

中文社科讲座资讯

@chwebinars

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,625subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001420849888
TypeChannel
Username@chwebinars
DescriptionHi,欢迎订阅中文社科讲座资讯,本广播以及讨论组希望为订阅者提供一个简单纯粹的社科学术环境。本台鼓励大家截图和录屏你听的讲座,请发送到 @imrsp,如果你愿意分享你的笔记,也欢迎联系我哦。 [讲座日历] https://t.me/chwebinars/917 [资料索引] https://www.notion.so/chwebinars/807070db92ca49f3a7b2d4d8afba22c0 [Matters主页] https://matters.news/@chwebinars
Created27 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chwebinars

Growth

2,6252,6262,625.56 Aug 2026, 14:49 — 2,626 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:43 — 2,625 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:497 Aug 2026, 13:43
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,625–2,626 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 13:432,625-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:492,626first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 8 December 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,650
Videos
2
Links
727

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 27m
Average length
2h 27m

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

23 Dec 2022, 04:42 UTC≈9,060 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

【宣传】 坚果兄弟是关于国内社会公共话题首屈一指的行为艺术家(可以观看这期一席和NHK的专访了解他们),近日他们发起了一项给农村老人捐赠退烧药的公益活动。但现在无论是药物还是志愿者都很匮乏,希望各位有余力的朋友可以贡献一份自己的力量,或者如果你知道哪里的农村正缺药也可以提供信息。 大家可以Follow他们的社交媒体了解最新情况: 微博:坚果兄弟NutBrother 公众号:通过微信搜索“情况有点复杂”,或者微信扫描图中二维码 同时大家还可以在微信搜索小程序“新冠防护药物公益互助”来帮助身边缺药的朋友或者请求药物。祝大家都身体健康。

11 Dec 2022, 16:27 UTC≈10,900 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

一个两年前录的网络安全讲座,现在分享给各位,保护好自己

7 Dec 2022, 13:08 UTC≈8,970 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

12/08 演講:何明修|世紀學生運動與台灣民主化 一個國家民主化的過程中,通常會經歷什麼過程? 而在民主化的過程之中,學生運動又扮演了什麼角色? 要回答這兩個問題,台灣民主化的經驗是否能夠有所啟發? 演講題目:世紀學生運動與台灣民主化 12/08 (四)20:00-22:00 何明修教授|國立台灣大學社會學系 ZOOM 房間號:962 2114 0460 Matters宣傳頁:https://ipfs.io/ipfs/Qmf1dricv64s3GqT1Sy2DFgCqPHGUjWnsCae8zgMKJQQAA/

26 Nov 2022, 17:32 UTC≈7,810 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

【警告】 最近群体事件多发,网警可能开始活跃行动。如果看到任何可疑的私信请不要理睬。 使用telegram须做好基本的防护工作,包括隐藏电话号码,不使用墙内平台使用过的用户名和头像,在人多的大群考虑使用小号发言。

25 Nov 2022, 05:57 UTC≈6,050 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

聚焦康乐:民族志的视野和实践 北京时间:2022年11月26日,周六上午9:30-12:30 Zoom:93268782629 密码:899553

3 Nov 2022, 06:06 UTC≈8,380 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

疫情与社会:“防”疫的反思 三年前Covid-19 的疫情爆发,短时间内就传播到世界各地,全球的防疫措施也深深改变了这三年来人们生活的样貌。 这些以“防疫”为名的种种措施,三年来一直也是热门的公共议题,除了讨论防疫措施是否有效,防疫是否及时,防疫成本是否过大外,也有许多防疫措施是否侵犯人权的讨论。 在全世界防疫工作即将进入新阶段的时刻,我们是不是可以回头来,检视防疫措施如何形塑了这三年来新的社会样貌,并且反思防疫措施中的那些过去来不及讨论的疑虑。 11/4 (五)20:00-22:00 差异的团结:从人权观点反思防疫政治与伦理 李柏翰|台湾大学公共卫生学院助理教授 11/10 (四) 20:00-22:00 台湾的『科技防疫』与法制反省 罗承宗|南台科大财经法律研究所特聘教授 11/21(一)20:00-22:00 Covid-19 的人文与社会省思:从关键字切入 刘绍华 中央研究院民族学研究所副研究员

21 Sept 2022, 05:03 UTC≈9,400 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

父权制与资本主义 时间:2022/09/23 15:00~17:00 讲者:上野千鹤子 语言:日语 ZOOM会议号:630 747 6434 阅读活动详情

2 Sept 2022, 01:52 UTC≈6,850 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

2022年全国数学哲学学术研讨会 9月2日-9月5日 详情

3 Jun 2022, 06:04 UTC≈11,300 viewsread 7 August 2026

今年6·4是天安门事件33周年,以下资源帮助你记住和了解更多: -六四网络博物馆:https://8964museum.com -六四网络博物馆资料下载:https://mega.nz/folder/JwBnBaAS#VHpVoxomqweZPx8C4KrW4w 另请关注: -香港反送中纪录片《时代革命》(拥有visa信用卡与台湾ip可观看):https://hamivideo.hinet.net/product/191774.do?cs=2 -《时代革命》mega网盘下载:https://mega.nz/file/BooRTbpb#L8LHhReiJc4J8XUHTPCKEgjAqcdIdZsnDnkuT6XEYHU

21 Apr 2022, 04:01 UTC≈8,060 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

婦女平等就業權利的立法和司法保障 時間:2022年4月27日晚8:00-10:00 分享嘉賓:劉小楠(中國政法大學人權研究院教授, 中國政法大學憲政研究中心主任,中國婦女研究會常務理事, 中國社會法研究會理事) 語言:普通話(提供實時字幕) Zoom號碼:946 5145 0985 鏈接:https://hku.zoom.us/meeting/94651450985 或掃描海報中的二維碼加入直播

15 Apr 2022, 15:54 UTC≈5,960 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

师生对谈沙龙第二十四期:女性/性别前沿理论问题 时间: 2022年4月15日(周五)14:00-17:00 主讲人 : 佟新(北京大学社会学系 教授) ——数字经济赋权县域女性发展 李志生(北京大学历史学系 副教授) ——情感史:感性世界与历史样貌 史春风(北京大学马克思主义学院 副教授) ——为什么模糊了性别 从二十世纪中国妇女解放运动谈起 刘小楠(中国政法大学人权研究院 教授) ——妇女权益保障法修订及蕴含的性别平等理念 陈业强 《山东女子学院学报》主编、教授——2021年妇女/性别研究 以人大复印报刊资料为例 主办方: 中国政法大学教师发展中心 北京大学中外妇女问题研究中心 《山东女子学院学报》编辑部 协办方 中国政法大学“薪火”历史文化研习社 腾讯会议ID:966 573 808

17 Mar 2022, 11:35 UTC≈5,320 viewsread 7 August 2026

田野、参与和民族志研究伦理 Fieldwork, Engagement, and the Ethics of Ethnographic Research 时间:2022年3月17日20:00-22:00 主讲人:迈克·赫兹菲尔德(Michael Herzfeld) 哈佛大学人类学系荣休教授 主持人:李宇晴 清华大学国际与地区研究院助理研究员 直播平台:六尺巷直播平台 地址链接https://live.liuchixiang.com/live/tvchat-760021153?v=1647430243669

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @chwebinars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 758,685 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“中文社科讲座资讯” (@chwebinars), 2,625 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chwebinars.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.