Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🌳 初栀🤩假照免费,颜值系🥇𝘽𝙍𝘼𝘽𝙐𝙎®认证必冲老师

Channel

🌳 初栀🤩假照免费,颜值系🥇𝘽𝙍𝘼𝘽𝙐𝙎®认证必冲老师

@chuzhihz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

8,544subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001600656394
TypeChannel
Username@chuzhihz
Description个人自聊,高端小区,环境优越 真人真照,身材好,皮肤雪白,电报号 @chuzizizizi2 🥝172.22.97斤,c➕
CreatedBetween 1 October 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chuzhihz

Growth

8,5438,5448,543.523 Aug 2026, 16:45 — 8,543 subscribers24 Aug 2026, 15:54 — 8,544 subscribers23 Aug 2026, 16:4524 Aug 2026, 15:54
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,543–8,544 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 15:548,544+1
23 Aug 2026, 16:458,543first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 8,544 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,090
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.197%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held26 (27 May 202628 August 2026)
Views total12,013
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
341
Videos
127
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4963.6%
😍1620.8%
👍810.4%
👻22.60%
❤‍🔥11.30%
👏11.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 03:53 UTC958 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

补发了最近的作业,哥哥们 今天开课啦❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

3

24 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC905 viewsread 28 August 2026

【妹子花名】:#初栀 【联系方式】:@chuzizizizi2 【妹子年龄】:20+ 【验证留名】:R 【验证时间】:2026.8.23 【大概位置】:滨江 【修车水费】:1000p 【人照相似】:9分 【身高身材】:身材匀称,皮肤白皙 【凶器罩杯】:胸C 【环境细节】:交通/出入方便,房间整洁 【个人卫生】:没感觉抽烟 【时间管理】:开课准时,排课宽松,课时做完 【服务点评】:很不错 【流程小文】:袭人的香气,乳白色的吊带上装露出香肩,绸质的短裙配高跟水晶凉鞋,将晶莹修长的双腿完整地呈现出来。火热的夏日里出现如此盛夏的打扮,极度让人血管膨胀。隔着丝质的睡衣我看见小雪白如琼脂的双乳几道深深的淤痕。一时之间不知道该说什么,只好将她搂紧一些,让她看不到我此时的表情。就像现在,她开始用她生疏的口技拨弄我的JJ,让龟头一点一点地分泌出滑液,然后当琼浆玉液一样吸干净,然后周而复始,乐此不疲。我只能说目睹这个过程让我很满足,而整个感觉确实不

24 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC688 viewsread 28 August 2026

【𝘽𝙍𝘼𝘽𝙐𝙎®精选评价】 【𝘽 评价】:值得一试👍🏻/体验不错 【𝙍 老师】:初栀 @chuzizizizi2 【𝘼 水费】:1000p 定金一百可抵扣 【𝘽 报告人】:哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦 【𝙐 大概年龄】:看起来也就20多出头 【𝙎 体验评价】:看到初栀姐姐开课啦,马上就约了起来,约过好几次姐姐啦,生怕姐姐又消失不开课,不回信息,放下手里所有事情在约好的时间过来啦,遥控上楼,小区环境很高端,终于见到姐姐啦,真的很喜欢姐姐,遇到过初栀姐姐,我就没有约过其她老师了,很喜欢和姐姐呆在一起的感觉,纵然时间短暂,那也很足够满意了,初栀姐姐99年比我大一岁,可惜不允许,天公不作美,不然我得好好追求姐姐,嘻嘻,也就心里想一想,姐姐优点很多,每次我都要留下痕迹记录下来 【® 服务态度】:可爱,很好 【𝙃 待提升项】: 【𝙕 特色】:特色很多,姐姐说过,每个人喜欢的不一样,所以我就不多说啦,你们自己可以感受,体验 📮 本评价自发布起一

24 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC657 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

【𝘽𝙍𝘼𝘽𝙐𝙎®精选评价】 【𝘽 评价】:值得一试👍🏻/体验不错 【𝙍 老师】:初栀 @chuzizizizi2 【𝘼 水费】:1000p 定金一百可抵扣 【𝘽 报告人】:少知 【𝙐 大概年龄】:看起来也就24.5岁这样 【𝙎 体验评价】:久违了初栀老师,很开心可以再见到,上次很久前了,这次见面老师貌似身材更好了,胸变大了,屁股也变大了,身材还是很高挑,韵味更加迷人了,三生有幸,人美价廉,宝藏还是被我薅到了,貌似老师更加健谈了,叽叽喳喳的,非常可爱,特别边说边笑,还不忘抱着,偶尔亲我脸颊一下,不得不说,情绪价值拉满,女友感爆炸💥了。 【® 服务态度】:真的无可挑剔了,千元价格确实属于上等 【𝙃 待提升项】:无,真的挑不出来 【𝙕 特色】:老师百变魔王,外表御姐,交谈性格外放,情商很高,床上娇嫩,水多小女人【不得不提,老师口活绝绝子,一般人压根顶不住,老师这口活让人欲罢不能,还有老师的大长腿,总之太爱了,推荐】 📮 本评价自

1

23 Aug 2026, 02:53 UTC931 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

休息几个月啦,哥哥们可以开始预约啦😘😘😘😘😘久等啦我的北鼻们,我终于回来啦

1

7 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC≈2,440 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

终于回杭州啦,可约啦哥哥们

3😍1

31 Jul 2026, 05:35 UTC≈2,760 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

3👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @chuzhihz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,297,803 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌳 初栀🤩假照免费,颜值系🥇𝘽𝙍𝘼𝘽𝙐𝙎®认证必冲老师” (@chuzhihz), 8,544 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chuzhihz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.