写报告拿积分⭐抽大奖获取 ❤萝卜青菜各有所爱,出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点,请各位自行斟酌考量❗ 【出击日期】:930 【出击人ID】:Cgz3000w 【老师艺名】:初夏 【客服账号】:@fujianjingpin 【城市地区】:集美 【茶费次数】:7-1 【人照相似】:85 【目测年龄】:25 【颜值妆造】:85 【身材曲线】:90 【乳房状态】:a 【臀部形态】:大翘 【皮肤状态】:偏白 【bb的状态】:很紧水多 【服务评分】:90 【情绪价值】:90 【日☀后感/详细描述】:长相有点显老不过应该年纪不大 服务态度 特别的好 身材少女身材 很瘦 不过屁股特别大 腿和屁股很白 反馈不错 【总体评分】:85 【推荐指数】⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐(最高7颗星) 【客服榜】 t.me/fujianbaogaochaxun
Channel
初夏 报告栏
@chuxiabaogaolan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 30 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004305421521 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chuxiabaogaolan |
| Created | 7 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 30 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chuxiabaogaolan |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 2 | +1 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12200.0%
- avg views ÷ 2 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 244
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 5 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (7 July 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 244 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
写报告拿积分⭐抽大奖获取 ❤萝卜青菜各有所爱,出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点,请各位自行斟酌考量❗ 【出击日期】:7🈷️7日 【出击人ID】:落日 【老师艺名】:初夏 【客服账号】:@fujianjingpin 【城市地区】:集美 【茶费次数】:7 【人照相似】:90 【目测年龄】:24 【颜值妆造】:90 【身材曲线】:90 【乳房状态】:差不多B吧 【臀部形态】:这个大 【皮肤状态】:白 【bb的状态】:紧 【服务评分】:90 【情绪价值】:90 【日☀后感/详细描述】:12点杀过去 看到老师👩🏫很激动 因为在集美 开门是一个非常好看的老师 很温柔的感觉 开始洗漱 然后开始 老师全程很温柔 跟你朋友一样 可惜我感冒刚好状态不佳 下次一定要二刷 【总体评分】:90 【推荐指数】⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐(最高7颗星) 【客服榜】 t.me/fujianbaogaochaxun
写报告拿积分⭐抽大奖获取 ❤萝卜青菜各有所爱,出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点,请各位自行斟酌考量❗ 【出击日期】:0707 【出击人ID】:LD 【老师艺名】:初夏 【客服账号】:@fujianjingpin 【城市地区】:集美 【茶费次数】:7 【人照相似】:(满分100)85 【目测年龄】:22-23 【颜值妆造】:(满分100)85 【身材曲线】:(满分100)85 【乳房状态】:(大小/真假)b 【臀部形态】:(小巧/大翘) 【皮肤状态】:(肤色/质感) 【bb的状态】:(户型/紧湿度)湿紧 【服务评分】:(满分100) 【情绪价值】:(满分100) 【日☀后感/详细描述】:(不低于五十字,内容补充,可描过程表现,服务细节,优缺点,房间环境等) 【总体评分】:(满分100)90,排雷小专家来了,开车30分钟来到集美,开门直接交水费开工,颜值基本和照片没区别,特别突出的屁股和小脚丫,很水很润,好评一个 【推荐指数…
写报告拿积分⭐抽大奖获取 ❤萝卜青菜各有所爱,出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点,请各位自行斟酌考量❗ 【出击日期】:7.7 【出击人ID】:匿名男 【老师艺名】:初夏 【客服账号】:@fujianjingpin 【城市地区】:湖里 【茶费次数】:7-2 【人照相似】:90 【目测年龄】:25 【颜值妆造】:85 【身材曲线】:85 【乳房状态】:85 【臀部形态】:B+ 【皮肤状态】:正常 【bb的状态】:一般紧度,有点点异味 【服务评分】:90 【情绪价值】:95 【日☀后感/详细描述】:整体感觉80分。LS属于偏瘦类型,整体服务很不错,用认真来形容。算是兼职,偶尔出来做。课表写的有69,我没有尝试,因为LS下面有点点异味。喜欢S味的可以试一下。(不低于五十字,内容补充,可描过程表现,服务细节,优缺点,房间环境等) 【总体评分】:80(满分100) 【推荐指数】⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐(最高7颗星) 【客服榜】 t.me/fu…
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @chuxiabaogaolan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“初夏 报告栏” (@chuxiabaogaolan), 2 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chuxiabaogaolan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.