Интервью захватили интернет

Channel
ЧУРКА
@churka993
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003119880306 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @churka993 |
| Description | Ютуб: https://youtube.com/@churka_999?si=wNdXPCoatsPnEX2p Инста: https://www.instagram.com/papika_death?igsh=OTU0dXl1MmpwYXk2 Тик ток: https://www.tiktok.com/@churka072?_t=ZS-8zYdH8XpR5k&_r=1 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/churka993 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 8 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 8 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 9 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 88
- Videos
- 11
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 30s
- Average length
- 30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
42 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5411101289025145575 | 26 | 61.9% | |
| custom 5411560923540259002 | 4 | 9.52% | |
| custom 5413566961030300276 | 4 | 9.52% | |
| custom 5413680945167368025 | 4 | 9.52% | |
| custom 5411390812770567856 | 2 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5413618552177460572 | 2 | 4.76% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 20 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Меня заебали эти ебанные интервью. Они же буквально везде. Все друг у друга берут интервью. Причём, это всё одни и те же люди. Человек берёт интервью, а потом идёт и даёт своё. И так несколько раз.
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54111012890251455754
Video, posted without a caption
Мосгорсуд ещё на 4,5 года отсрочил чемпионство Арсена Маркаряна в UFC. Блогеру дали 4 года и 6 месяцев колонии общего режима по статье о реабилитации нацизма. Вину Арсен в полной мере признал, просил суд не лишать его свободы, но, видимо, в этот раз выступил не очень убедительно. А, ну и по приговору суда после выхода на свободу он также не сможет администрировать сайты. Маркарян. База. Отписаться
Это для меня нарисовали🥰
custom 54111012890251455753
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54111012890251455754
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54111012890251455755
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54136809451673680253
Да, минус тридцать пять выглядит именно так
custom 54115609235402590022custom 54136809451673680251
Мне даже непривычно
custom 54111012890251455752
Почему меня такие хорошие люди окружают? Ни одного долбаёба рядом нету.
custom 54136185521774605722custom 54111012890251455751
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @churka993. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 955,499 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧУРКА” (@churka993), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/churka993.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.