Channel
@chunaijieshao
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,904subscribers
-2,307 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001966397583 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chunaijieshao |
| Created | 26 March 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chunaijieshao |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 1,904 | -535 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 2,439 | -433 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 2,872 | -726 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 3,598 | -436 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:27 | 4,034 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 4,055 | -35 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 4,090 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 4,101 | -26 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 4,127 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 4,138 | -41 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 4,179 | -15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 4,194 | -17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 4,211 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 4,211 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 26 March 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2023 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⬆️频道地区⬆️👍看美美私信客服 详细咨询群内客服❤️ 🐮每天频道全网更新😀😀😀➕ ⭐xue生、御姐、罗莉、白领、良家、少fu、顶美天菜、全部有哦⁉️ 😘全网担保5️⃣0️⃣0️⃣🔠 🥰实力认证、靠谱第一 ☀认准群管理、客服不会主动私信任何仁 另有1 、2 线城市高端大圈外围 最快半小时上门 😇纯爱下单流程介绍😇 😇纯爱加入会员益处😇 😇纯爱微信视频验证😇 😇纯爱介绍费解惑处😇 😇纯爱地区导航中心😇
💫以上便是妹妹的验证视频，验证视频都是原相机或微信打视频录频的，所以真实程度非常高。 💫VIP: 888RMB或者100U办理会员，下单等额抵扣消费。 💫VIP权益：进会员群，解锁验证视频，可优先锁单。 🩷客服：樱樱 🩷客服：甜心
常见问题统一汇总 《关于介绍费》🥰 1介绍费相当于中介费，它的定价是根据聊手团队开发的难度与 mm的质量决定的。开发一个mm是一件高强度的工作，维护成 本极高，为了长期维护mm的感情，需要同时与大量mm嘘寒问 暖，转账、发红包、小礼物、奶茶等等，有些需要几个月甚至半 年才能拿下。如果让老板你去做，需要浪费你大量的时间精力钱 财都不一定拿的下。同时聊手有一定的法律风险。 《包养干净吗》🥰 2干净，愿意被包养的大部分都是雪生，白领，良家大多都是以 出来兼职为主，不会把这个当作事业。出来兼职的原因大多都 是，想要一个苹果手机，名牌口红化妆品包包，单纯不够钱花出 来补贴家用。 《包养不等于外围》🥰 3老司机都知道外围中圈和大圈的女生一天就能赚1-2w，偶尔 遇到大哥打赏一天能赚5-6w，所以做过外围的小姐根本看不上包 养这点小钱。 有客户曾经问外围小姐知不知道包养，小姐表示包养都是雪生才 做的。好像确实如此 《关于车旅费》🥰 4妹子的零…
❤1
🌈🌈🌈介绍费解惑🌈🌈🌈 🌈包养常见问题1：为什么介绍费这么高❓ 🌈包养常见问题2：包养和嫖娼的区别❓ 🍦我们开发的妹子都是专业聊手从各大渠道开发的素人妹子，很多都是有正经工作的教师，白领，相比较专业的外围少了很多风尘气，体验感完全是天差地别，居家旅行，实属出差办公必备良品。👍 💰说贵？外围包夜都是8000起步，包天都是按万起，👑你去当地的世纪佳缘，珍爱网相亲加入个丐版会员都是8千起步，手都摸不到，还要被鄙视。而我这个是学生妹基本上和照片视频没有区别，甚至会比照片更好看。🫰 ❤️包养的妹妹跟你玩的野鸡外围不一样！！包养的妹妹就好像你找了一个小猫咪🤔，听话乖巧，妹妹自己也会觉得自己是找了一个有钱的金主男朋友，重回恋爱的感觉。🌈 🌹资源是我们一天19个小时高强度大海捞针，大脑都快烧了😳，捞出来的，很多妹妹我们都需要跟踪联系几个月才能够谈下来的，🤌是一件很辛苦的事情。 🌈🌈🌈妹妹生活费支付方式🌈🌈🌈 1，微信支付宝都可以…
为什么要入会员？ 1️⃣进会员群和包过的老板们可一起讨论by经验，防止踩坑。 2️⃣可免费观看视频认证，看一些不方便公开的妹妹照片资料，偶尔还会有妹妹的私密照。 3️⃣活动期间可免费领取妹妹联系方式（不收取任何费用） 4️⃣极品妹妹会优先发会员群（可优先锁单） 5️⃣除了聊妹子，还可以增加老板人脉，寻求线下的生意合作。 6️⃣重点！过滤口嗨，过滤没实力的老板，888的小钱，包养本身是高消费项目，很多人根本没有包养的意愿与实力，上来就瞎问，增加了很多工作量，所以设置了入会的门槛，腾出时间为真正有包养意愿的老板服务。 7️⃣会员群不能截图，老板们发色图交流更安全，隐私性更好。
✨选妹基本流程✨ 1️⃣挑选好，转发给客服，确定妹妹还在不在 2️⃣入会员 解锁所有妹妹微信认证视频 3️⃣敲定包养时长，妹妹工资以及见面日期等细节。 4️⃣付介绍费，订下妹子（见面不满意可以换） 5️⃣安排妹妹见面。 注：见面不满意十分钟内反馈给客服，不添加微信不留联系方式可以换人，需报销妹妹路费。超时默认满意成交。 初次保养解惑 【为什么要先给介绍费再安排见面，这里详细解释一下】 1，所有妹妹都是聊手去各大渠道一个个聊天开发的良家妹妹，不要问是不是鸡，不否认有极低可能会聊到鸡，毕竟每天上千的更新量，说一个没有是不可能的，但是能保证的是百分之99以上是良家，由于大部分是良家，如果不给介绍费就安排见面很容易见面后和老板私下交易，大可给妹妹一半介绍费就不搭理我们中介，中介直接成了小丑。 2，如果见面后再给介绍费，会出现很多口嗨，让妹子去某某地方 去了结果老板是放鸽子的口嗨，一来二去不会有妹妹再相信中介了，所以介绍费就是保…
❤2
🤯【纯爱】包养业内最大的bao养养平台🤯 🤔【纯爱】正式入驻新币担保平台🤔 🤔新币担保公群1️⃣4️⃣0️⃣🤔 🤔全网100万USDT作为保证金🤔 🤔新币公群140: F: 140 供押15000U【纯爱BAO养】公群 旗下资源日更新200+以上，资源覆盖全guo 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 我们给您提供的保障与福利！ 🤭全程1对1服务 🤗如果您觉得路费太麻烦，上压后我方可帮你垫付（500内） 🫤如果发生三天内妹子跑路，可更换同价mei子 🤗如发生见面妹子对您不满意，我方全额报销路费 🤗如发生您出了路费妹子鸽子，我方可补差价 🤯 定金后享优惠福利，首单介绍费8.5折！ （规则保障内，如您触犯规则按照规则走即可） 😐 信誉保障再次加码 😐 🤭.完美成交5单，第六单6折； 🤗.完美成交10单，成为忠实客戸！如打一泡因妹子问题跑路，免费换同等价格妹子！此保障，长期有效！ 🫤.我们会在次日中午12点前再次询问老板美…
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @chunaijieshao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💕纯爱bao养🥰您的专属伴侣🔥支持担保💎” (@chunaijieshao), 1,904 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chunaijieshao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.