Channel
@chujibaogaoting
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
138subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002359924883 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chujibaogaoting |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 14 February 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chujibaogaoting |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:33 | 138 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 138 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 February 2025 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 31 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2025 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
无锡最活跃的出击群组 https://t.me/wixihonglou 报告模板： https://t.me/chujibaogaoting/14 【妹子花名】：#初初 【联系方式】：@chuchu68891 【验证留名】：jknfd 【验证时间】：8.17 【大概位置】：梁溪区 【修车水费】：7 【人照相似】：9 【身高身材】：162 【凶器罩杯】：C 【环境细节】：7 【服务点评】：6 【推荐程度】：9 【流程小文】：无锡这天气，台风一来都是雨，大雨也不影响出击，风雨无阻。看到ls照片，突然激动了，约了头了课，按照ls发的星光地址，提前半小时到了，等待过程有点漫长。和ls沟通半天发现来错位置了，赶紧打车过去，到了晚半小时也是醉了…… 进屋第一眼觉得ls眼睛真大，没有照片丰满，胳膊腿很细，看着是个萝莉。脱完衣服发现肉都长到该去的地方，🐻很大一手握不住，屁股很圆润，手感很好，当然肚子有点肉肉也正常。 躺下后ls开始服务…
【验证留名】 ：ikun 【验证时间】：4.19 【老师名称】：香香 【联系方式】tg： @xiang16897 【老师类型】：御姐 【服务水平】：9 【服务态度】：9 【修车水费】：800pp 【颜值相似】：9 【上课环境】：9 【老师优势】：温柔 态度好 服务好 【整体打分】：9 「打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲」 总结:一进门就闻到一股花香，老师公寓环境非常好，人说话也轻声细语十分温柔。交完水费先洗澡，老师会贴心的给你擦干，过程中还一直找话题聊天，不会冷场。洗完开始服务，指划裸口冰火69一应俱全，随后戴套女上进入正戏，慕名而来体验一下电动床，感觉还是很新奇的，具体感觉就像老师在你身上高频女上，只不过俩人都不用动。之后换姿势传教士体位出货，做完老师还会一直和你聊天，情绪价值拉满
【验证留名】 ： 【验证时间】：3.23 【老师名称】：香香 【联系方式】tg： @xiang16897 【老师类型】：御姐 【服务水平】：9 【服务态度】：9 【修车水费】：800pp 【颜值相似】：8 【上课环境】：9 【老师优势】：热情 细心 【整体打分】：9 「打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲」 总结：今天跑完马拉松出击香香老师，老师颜值比照片上要高，该有的服务都有，口技绝佳，电动床的体验也很好，老师也很风趣幽默不尬场，推荐朋友们出击。
【验证留名】 ： 【验证时间】：3.10 【老师名称】：香香 【联系方式】tg： @xiang16897 【老师类型】：御姐 【服务水平】：8 【服务态度】：9 【修车水费】：500p 【颜值相似】：8 【上课环境】：9 【老师优势】：热情 细心 【整体打分】：8 「打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲」 总结：今日出击香香，老师颜值不错，服务也很齐全，态度很好，尤其是口技和电动床五档，值得一试。
❤1
【验证留名】 ：潮牌云 【验证时间】：3.9 【老师名称】：咩咩 【联系方式】tg： @babybaby998 【老师类型】：嫩妹 大熊 【服务水平】：8 【服务态度】：9 【修车水费】：800p 【颜值相似】：8 【上课环境】：9 【老师优势】：服务细心 温柔 胸大 【整体打分】：9 「打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲」 总结：无聊水群，发现群里新上老师，一看见立马觉得是我的菜，于是私聊确认时间便决定出击，到达课室之后遥控上楼，环境很好，见到老师立马走不动路，一个字，很白，很漂亮，人照一摸一样，于是便开始常规环节，值得一提，老师陪浴的时候会给你胸推，不得不说皮肤真的好，又白，身上嫩妹独有的香味，赞不绝口，老师还会毒龙，纯舌，超级舒服，女上非常舒服，胸很挺，视觉效果拉满，是我最近出击遇到最喜欢的了，过程非常契合，缴枪后老师还陪你聊天，情绪价值拉满，万分推荐，唯一的缺点就是老师不蛇纹，遗憾！ 报告提交机器人…
【验证留名】 ： 【验证时间】：3.8 【老师名称】：咩咩 【联系方式】tg： @babybaby998 【老师类型】：嫩妹 【老师身材】：胸大粉嫩 【服务态度】：温柔不催 各种姿势都配合 【修车水费】：1400 pp 【颜值相似】：9分像 【上课环境】：酒店 【老师优势】：口活一流每次舔的时候都会用舌尖滑过毫无齿感 【整体打分】： 「9分无脑冲」 总结：各项莞式服务都有 本人个人原因没有要毒🐲 老哥们可以体验一下 报告提交机器人：@xiaonezha998_bot 【狼友交流群】：https://t.me/wixihonglou
【验证留名】 ：第一神曲 【验证时间】：3.5 【老师名称】：护士小妮妮 【联系方式】tg： @baby19990808 【老师类型】：嫩妹 大熊 【服务水平】：8 【服务态度】：9 【修车水费】：800p 【颜值相似】：8 【上课环境】：9 【老师优势】：热情 细心 胸大 【整体打分】：8 「打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲」 总结：今日出击小护士妮妮，女孩很不错，还给我看了护士证，确实是护士兼职，本人一直以来对护士就有暗恋情节，今天看到护士兼职，立马开始骚动起来。还好老师优秀，并没有让我失望，服务也很齐全，态度很好，胸大皮肤白，值得推荐。
【验证留名】 ：Lzip 【验证时间】：3.2 【老师名称】：香香 【联系方式】tg： @xiang16897 【老师类型】：嫩妹 【老师身材】：微胖 【服务态度】：很热情 【修车水费】：5 【颜值相似】：8 【上课环境】：公寓 【老师优势】：真的很热情很会聊天 【整体打分】：8 「打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲」 总结：一个很热情的妹妹 一进门就开始接话茬 很会聊天 全程不会让人尬场 本人与照片几乎无差 屁股也很大 总的来说物超所值 幽默风趣 【狼友交流群】：https://t.me/wixihonglou
【验证留名】 ：匿名 【验证时间】：2025.3.1 【老师名称】：vv 【联系方式】tg： @wxvvls001 【老师类型】：温柔 本人比照片好看 【服务水平】：非常好 【服务态度】：细致，温柔，耐心 【修车水费】：1000pp 【颜值相似】：本人比照片好看 【上课环境】：很好 【老师优势】：细致 漂亮 认真 耐心 【整体打分】： 9 「打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲」 总结：老师人很好，一眼惊艳，虽然不善言谈，但是很耐心的聆听，而且不会冷场，过程中也一直观察对方的感受。像个朋友一样，值得长期来学习 【狼友交流群】：https://t.me/wixihonglou
【验证留名】 ：大鸡哥哥 【验证时间】：3.3 【老师名称】：小白菜 【联系方式】tg： 【老师类型】：御姐（嫩妹 御姐 少妇 大妈 快餐 服务系 ） 【老师身材】：bbw 【服务态度：满分 【修车水费】：7 【颜值相似】：人照区别不大 【上课环境】：号 【老师优势】：态度好， 【整体打分】：9 「打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲」 总结：老师就是传说中的bbw，太爱了，口活也很舒服，最后还试了一下深喉，做的时候姿势随便换，不催，我们做了差不多20分钟才结束，最后在老师一声声老公中结束战斗，最后提一句，呆呆的小白菜，特别喜欢 报告提交机器人：@xiaonezha998_bot 【狼友交流群】：https://t.me/wixihonglou
【验证留名】 ：CX 【验证时间】：2.27 【老师名称】：小白菜🥬 【联系方式】tg： @xiaobaicai99 【老师类型】：嫩妹 【老师身材】：微胖 【服务态度】：很热情 【修车水费】：7 【颜值相似】：7 【上课环境】：酒店 【老师优势】：真的好可爱✧⁺⸜(●˙▾˙●)⸝⁺✧ 【整体打分】：7 「打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲」 总结：一个很可爱的优点婴儿👶🏻肥的小姑娘👧🏻。白白嫩嫩的，全程笑呵呵的很有意思。口的时候喜欢用舌尖快速扫你的肉棒尖，和婴儿肥的可爱外观形成反差，很刺激。关键还会阴推，下面也是粉粉嫩嫩的，坐下来的时候一下子裹住，很爽。冲刺结束以后还一起聊了好一会儿天，整体很愉快放松，最后要说，真的好可爱的妹妹。 【狼友交流群】：https://t.me/wixihonglou
【验证留名】 ：匿名 【验证时间】：2.27 【老师名称】：香香 【联系方式】tg： @xiang16897 【老师类型】：小姐姐 【服务水平】：高 【服务态度】：耐心 温柔 【修车水费】：5p 【颜值相似】：8 【上课环境】：9 【老师优势】：骚 【整体打分】：8 「打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲」 总结：今日出击群里很活跃的香香，妹妹服务好，善谈，给人一种很放松的感觉，属于有少妇感妹妹，皮肤很好，屁股翘，服务态度也不错，有道具很齐全，有电动床贼爽，很有女朋友的感觉，推荐狼友出击 【狼友交流群】：https://t.me/wixihonglou
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chujibaogaoting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“无锡出击报告榜” (@chujibaogaoting), 138 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chujibaogaoting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.