Channel
@chtwrsreports
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,984subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001108112459 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chtwrsreports |
| Created | 27 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chtwrsreports |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 1,984 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 1,987 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 1,989 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 1,992 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 1,992 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,340 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
🗺State of map: 🐲🌳Tower lvl.29 was easily protected 🎖Defense: Golem Sentinel lvl.29, Golem Sentinel lvl.29, Golem Sentinel lvl.29 🌚🌳Tower lvl.45 was easily protected 🎖Defense: 🐲[TSK]Wogan, 🐲🍱[LC]Yatendouji, 🐲[TSK]The Alchemist 🐲🍄Ancient Ruins lvl.70 was protected 🎖Attack: 🐲[TWS]Alphonse Elric, 🐲[TWS]vegeta_cream 🎖Defense: 🍀🕋[STL]Badr ad-Din 🐋🌳Outpost lvl.39 was easily protected 🎖Defense: 🐲[TWS]Blacky, 🐲[TWS]Roy Mus…
🤝Headquarters news: Thirsty Harpie was easily defended: 🎖Defense: 🍀🕋[STL]🎗Leoni Jalal Gor, 🌚🧂[FTW]Der_Horst, 🍀[YS]Musmir al-Alami Prime Aurora was easily breached. Attackers have pillaged alliance for 📦 and 🎖: 🎖Attack: 🐲🍱[LC]EL CAPI, 🐲🦑[DHC]Carlos, 🐲🦑[DHC]Fighter Mother Star was easily defended: 🎖Defense: 🐲🐊[PS]Mag16, 🐲🐊[PS]Powerultra, 🐲🐊[PS]Santanarini Original Cayman was easily defended: 🎖Defense: 🐲🦴[SIF]R2rc…
25 Hornung 1085 Battle reports: 💣🛡 At 🦅Highnest Castle defenders have easily fought off a small group of 🍀Rampart Castle. 🎖Attack leaders: 🍀[YS]El4itoS 🎖Defense leaders: 🦅[GO]Ice Bear 🦅[TON]Eliot 🦅[A1]Фунфырик 🦅[IRL]A Holy Shield 🏆Attackers have lost 1 gold. 💣⚔️ At 🐈Wolfpack Castle the defenders were wiped out by a horde from 🐲Dragonscale Castle,🍀Rampart Castle &🌚Moonlight Castle. 🎖Attack leaders: 🐲🦴[SIF]Ивар Грай …
😴 The defenders of guildhalls were bored - no one has attacked them. 🐲FD Defenders: 🍀HEZ, 🐲FD 🦅WCH Defenders: 🦅POS 😴 Self defenders were double bored - no one has attacked them, no one has defended them: 🐋ASG, 🦅CHS, 🦌DD, 🦌DEF, 🐲DOS, 🐲FAM, 🍀FWD, 🐋H2O, 🐋IND, 🦌KND, 🐋MIE, 🐋NAT, 🐋ORD, 🦅POS, 🍀RS6, 🐋RYP, 🦌S3X, 🐋TDA, 🦌TS, 🐈URN, 🐈USA, 🍀YS, 🍀ZZ
25 Hornung 1085 Battle reports: ⚔️At 🦅Highnest Castle the attackers destroyed the western gate. 🎖Attack leaders: 🐈[RE]ENTRY PROHIBITED 🐈[RE]Zerkus 🐈[RE]ALITY BITES 🐈[URN]Nealw 🎖Defense leaders: 🦅Obitatel' 🦅[TON]Javyer 🦅zinogre 🏆Attackers have pillaged the castle for 1059 gold and 391 stock. ⚔️At 🐈Wolfpack Castle the attackers destroyed the eastern gate. 🎖Attack leaders: 🐲👊[FC]Noname 🐲👊[FC]Vano 🍀🥃[TGV]ABOBA 🐲Yan11590…
24 Hornung 1085 Battle reports: 🛡 Defenders of 🦅Highnest Castle were bored - no one has attacked them. 💣⚔️ At 🐈Wolfpack Castle the defenders were wiped out by a horde from 🍀Rampart Castle,🌚Moonlight Castle &🐲Dragonscale Castle. 🎖Attack leaders: 🌚[PRN]Easter 🍀[TMI]Ko Murakami 🐲🦴[SIF]Ивар Грай 🌚[OCD]Atomic 🎖Defense leaders: 🐈🐸[ENL]aelftater 🐈[LIL]PEPDSDP 🐈🐸[ENL]Elon Musk 🐈[GNR]c10111 🏆Attackers have pillaged the castl…
🤝Headquarters news: Mad Wizard was easily defended: 🎖Defense: 🐲🍱[LC]Ezreal, 🐲🍱[LC]Butterhands, 🐲🍱[LC]Berenice Thirsty Harpie was easily defended: 🎖Defense: 🍀🕋[STL]🎗Leoni Jalal Gor, 🌚🧂[FTW]Der_Horst, 🍀🕋[STL]Шайтан Бабах Mother Star was easily defended: 🎖Defense: 🐲🐊[PS]Susedko, 🐲🐊[PS]MrCrause, 🐲👊[FC]Positive Original Cayman was easily defended: 🎖Defense: 🐲🦴[SIF]R2rchik
🗺State of map: 🐈🍄Tower lvl.61 belongs to Mother Star. Easy win: 🎖Attack: 🐲🐊[PS]UXEYA, 🐲🐊[PS]Mag16, 🐲🐊[PS]Markiza 🐲🌳Tower lvl.29 was easily protected 🎖Defense: Golem Sentinel lvl.29, Golem Sentinel lvl.29, Golem Sentinel lvl.29 🦅⛰Unfinished Mine lvl.65 was protected 🎖Attack: 🍀🕋[STL]Vazir ibn Hakim, 🍀🕋[STL]🎗danila_k8, 🍀[YS]Одноногий Фермер 🎖Defense: 🐲🍱[LC]Guardian Angel, 🐲[TWS]Fires, 🐲[TWS]ITACHI UCHIHA 🐋🌳Outpost lv…
🛡 The ⛺️Guildhall of 🐲14A was protected. Attackers: 🍀JCT Defenders: 🐲GGD ⚔ The ⛺️Guildhall of 🐲LC was successfully attacked. Attackers: 🍀JCT
⚔ The ⛺️Guildhall of 🐲TSK was successfully attacked. Attackers: 🍀JCT ⚔ The ⛺️Guildhall of 🐲TWS was successfully attacked. Attackers: 🍀JCT
😴 The defenders of guildhalls were bored - no one has attacked them. 🐲FD Defenders: 🍀HEZ 😴 Self defenders were double bored - no one has attacked them, no one has defended them: 🦅CHS, 🦌DD, 🦌DEF, 🐲DOS, 🐲FAM, 🍀FWD, 🐋H2O, 🐋IND, 🦌KND, 🐋MIE, 🐋NAT, 🐋ORD, 🍀RS6, 🐋RYP, 🦌S3X, 🐋TDA, 🦌TS, 🐈URN, 🍀YS
24 Hornung 1085 Battle reports: 🛡 Defenders of 🦅Highnest Castle were bored - no one has attacked them. ⚔️At 🐈Wolfpack Castle the attackers destroyed the southern gate. 🎖Attack leaders: 🐲👊[FC]Noname 🐲👊[FC]Vano 🍀🥃[TGV]ABOBA 🦅Estedealla 🎖Defense leaders: 🏆Attackers have pillaged the castle for 147 gold and 42 stock. 🛡 At 🦌Deerhorn Castle defenders have easily fought off a small group of 🦅Highnest Castle. 🎖Attack lead…
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @chtwrsreports. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 242,072 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chat Wars Reports” (@chtwrsreports), 1,984 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chtwrsreports.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.