Channel
@chtivvvo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
138subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001433607114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chtivvvo |
| Description | Канал начал своё существование здесь https://t.me/chtivvvo/4 Начало личных постов https://t.me/chtivvvo/356 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chtivvvo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 138 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 138 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
38 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 73.7% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 13.2% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 October 2023 to 3 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Novel phishing campaign uses corrupted Word documents to evade security A novel phishing attack abuses Microsoft's Word file recovery feature by sending corrupted Word documents as email attachments, allowing them to bypass security software due to their damaged state but still be recoverable by the application. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/novel-phishing-campaign-uses-corrupted-word-documents-to-…
👍3
Signed
Phishing emails increasingly use SVG attachments to evade detection Threat actors increasingly use Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) attachments to display phishing forms or deploy malware while evading detection. Most images on the web are JPG or PNG files, which are made of grids of tiny squares called pixels. Each pixel has a specific color value, and together, these pixels form the entire image. SVG, or Scalable …
👍1
Signed
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/11/microsoft-warns-of-8000-strong-botnet-used-in-password-spraying-attacks/ The malicious network, made up almost entirely of TP-Link routers, was first documented in October 2023 by a researcher who named it Botnet-7777. The geographically dispersed collection of more than 16,000 compromised devices at its peak got its name because it exposes its malicious malwa…
👍1
Signed
https://sharpsec.run/rce-vulnerability-in-qbittorrent/
👍2
Signed
https://securelist.com/miner-campaign-misuses-open-source-siem-agent/114022/
👍1
Signed
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/european-govt-air-gapped-systems-breached-using-custom-malware/
🔥1
Signed
LoL ))) reCAPTCHA Phish
😁2👎1
Signed
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/30926 Дежурное напоминание о важности MFA на примере реальной ситуации
Signed
https://blogs.infoblox.com/threat-intelligence/a-cunning-operator-muddling-meerkat-and-chinas-great-firewall/
👍2🔥1
Signed
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/technology/registrars-can-now-block-all-domains-that-resemble-brand-names/ Платная защита бренда от фишинговых доменов 😁 (результат не гарантирован)
👍1🔥1
Signed
https://www.presseportal.de/pm/173495/5713546
👍2
Signed
What did I say to make you stop talking to me? [...] Attackers are interested in attempting to detect honeypots; over the years, we have seen various ways to do so. But so far, we have not done much to prevent this. We randomize some fo the parameters, but overall, we just run a "stock" cowrie install. There is however a relatively easy method to find out what gave the honeypot away after the attacker connected. Mo…
👍2
Signed
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chtivvvo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📜 Чтиво 📜” (@chtivvvo), 138 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chtivvvo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.