Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хроники Ловёрса | ST

Channel

Хроники Ловёрса | ST

@chroniclesLO

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25,730subscribers

+25,266 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004459820567
TypeChannel
Username@chroniclesLO
DescriptionОбщий тгк новой сценарной команды сюжетных сезонов Лололошки. По всем вопросам пишите в сообщения канала.
Created26 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chroniclesLO

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

29,200 average views per post against 25,730 subscribers — an engagement rate of 113.3%. Across the 17,210 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,614 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.73% and 17.9%, with a median of 9.18%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (24 August 2026 23 September 2026)
Posts measured20 of 23 published in the window (0 exact, 20 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled583,100
Mature posts only132.3% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers25,730 measured 18 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 17,210 channels · p10 2.43% · p25 4.73% · p50 9.18% · p75 17.9% · p90 30.7%
Position in cohort99.861th percentile · 12.3× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.02% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

46425,73013,09726 August 2026 — 464 subscribers27 August 2026 — 668 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,974 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,267 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,682 subscribers16 September 2026 — 23,310 subscribers18 September 2026 — 25,730 subscribers26 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 23 days, net +25,266. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:2125,730+2,420
16 Sept 2026, 12:4123,310+20,628
12 Sept 2026, 08:542,682+415
7 Sept 2026, 19:592,267+293
3 Sept 2026, 01:361,974+1,306
27 Aug 2026, 08:28668+204
26 Aug 2026, 22:45464first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 26 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
113.3%
avg views ÷ 25,730 subscribers
Avg views / post
29,200
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held23 (26 August 202621 September 2026)
Views total583,100
Reactions total18,140
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
28
Videos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

18,140 reactions across 22 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7,23239.9%
🔥3,08617.0%
👎2,53013.9%
👍1,2096.66%
❤‍🔥1,0235.64%
😁5072.79%
😱4982.75%
🤔3231.78%
🤯3201.76%
🤨1510.832%
💘1370.755%
1340.739%
💊1150.634%
🥱1080.595%
🤣1000.551%
👏920.507%
🗿710.391%
🦄560.309%
🍓490.27%
👾470.259%
18 further kinds3521.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,140 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,091
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 22 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
1,000
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chroniclesLO. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 12:03 UTC≈13,800 views739 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026
Photo

Что повлияло на будущий сезон? Всем привет, пишет Кисик. Сегодня тестируем новую рубрику, в которой, мы рассказываем, какие произведения из медиа культуры повлияли на новый сезон. Если быть совсем откровенными, то мы раскрываем для вас карту референсов, которую составляли при питчинге. Альберто Васкес (СТРОГО 18+) Впервые я познакомился с Васкесом в 16 лет, когда посмотрел, единственную, на тот момент, его полноме

561❤‍🔥72🤔61👎14👾11🔥5💊4🍓3

18 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTC≈20,800 views1,527 reactions6 Starsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @MrLololoshka_EDITPhoto

✨ Что, если сделать другой выбор в финале? - В сегодняшнем ролике мы разобрали все выборы в финале и их исходы. А также пригласили нового сценариста - Арсения. Бежим смотреть! 😀 Видео на ютубе 📺 Видео на рутубе

1,200👍112❤‍🔥93👎32🙏25😨21🔥16🍓11

16 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC≈35,500 views1,637 reactions1,000 Starsread 23 September 2026

Всем привет, Арсений на связи Кажется, настало время наконец нормально представиться и мне, потому что за последние недели многие успели узнать обо мне очень много разного. Меня зовут Арсений Кочедыков, в интернете ник MarckPW. По образованию я режиссёр драмы, закончил ГИТИС. Театром занимаюсь довольно давно, плюс много лет работаю с драматургией, сценариями и вообще всем, что связано с придумыванием историй. До ST

🔥1,170248👎69❤‍🔥56👏20🥱20👾16💊13

16 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC≈28,500 views1,067 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

873👏67👍33😐21👾20❤‍🔥14💘12🔥9

15 Sept 2026, 17:10 UTC≈34,100 views1,248 reactions7 Starsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Хаиии, хеллоу, всем привет! Разнорабочих знаете? Вот, это я. В титрах вы меня видели (даже слышали, омг) под ником Kyouko, читать как «Кёко», ещё упоминалась по имени — Маша. Приятно познакомиться! С фандомом я знакома с выхода Голоса Времени (хотя, как и многие мои сверстники, смотрела творчество Ромы ещё в далеком 2013), смотрела все сюжетные сезоны, некоторые даже по несколько раз. В августе минул второй год моег

👍768291💘67❤‍🔥38🔥29💅18🍓12🕊7

14 Sept 2026, 14:12 UTCviews —3,166 reactions54 Starsread 23 September 2026

Posted without readable text

👎1,750😁492🤯320🤨151131🗿65👍62🤔57

14 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC≈70,500 views1,760 reactions23 Starsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Привет, привет) Я Сита и.... Я не сценарист😄 Да, сами серии и диалоги не моя юрездикция) Но давайте по порядку. Как я вообще попала в ST? Ну уже много лет я работала с Арсением в Грядут приключениях и занималась теми же проектами. Собственно в какой-то момент Арсений позвал меня поработать вместе когда нужно было разрабатывать концепт сезона. Вообще по образованию я инженер (раз уж тут все про свои профессии говорят

1,370👍142🔥95👎51💘29🥱25🍓12💊11

13 Sept 2026, 19:03 UTC≈63,400 views592 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Привет! Это MurNik. Можно называть Мурник, Мурка или просто Ника, откликаюсь на все. В комьюнити я личность новая, так что давайте потихоньку знакомиться. По образованию я лингвист-переводчик с бакалаврской степенью, а по душевному призванию писатель и сценарист. В писательской сфере кручусь уже лет десять. Несмотря на то, что в ФД я человек новый, за каналом Ромы слежу с далекого 2013 года, когда была ребенком. По

🔥419101💊21❤‍🔥17👎12💋9👍6🙏3

12 Sept 2026, 18:43 UTC≈49,200 views525 reactions993 Starsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Привет, пишет Кисик. Давно обещали сделать посты для знакомств и первые дни после выхода финала М47 — самое удачное время. Арсений ответственно доверил мне право первенства, но не переживайте, об остальных вы узнаете в ближайшее время. Итак, вам наверняка интересно, что я за чел, потому что ранее в ФД я не фигурировал вообще (ну, кроме парочки ответов на комменты). Поэтому дам немного вводных о себе. По образованию

401💊32❤‍🔥26👎22👍14🔥10💋7😁4

10 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTC≈36,400 views1,153 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Хейтеры скажут -- нейросеть. Встречайте новую команду сценарного отдела Ловёрса! Скоро познакомимся, пишите в комменты вопросы к членам команды, отразим в постах.

857❤‍🔥96🔥78👎49🤣40👍9💯7💋6

9 Sept 2026, 09:40 UTC≈35,500 views1,062 reactions2 Starsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Про воспоминания в финале М47. Вижу, что вокруг выбора Ромы заблокировать часть воспоминаний в финале «Мастерской 47» поднялось много обсуждений. Честно говоря, как сценарист я не очень люблю ход, при котором историю снова и снова приходится начинать с того, что герой ничего не знает и ничего не помнит и оказывается с нуля в неизвестном мире. Мне кажется, это довольно дешёвый способ каждый раз заново вводить персона

🔥632168👎85🥱63❤‍🔥40🤔30😐21💘10

8 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC≈29,500 views711 reactions2 Starsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Мастерская 47 – всё. Это было потрясающий путь длинной почти в год. Именно этот сезон привёл меня в фд и команду ст. Я благодарю Архимага, Сашу, Эден, Веронику, Рому – и всех тех, без кого Мастерская 47 не случилась бы. Для меня большой отвественностью и честью было помочь завершить эту чудесную историю и мой любимый сезон. Делитесь тут в комментариях своими впечатлениями, критикой(без оск), и вопросами по финалу м

❤‍🔥52587👎38🔥25😢20💘7👍6💅1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @chroniclesLO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хроники Ловёрса | ST” (@chroniclesLO), 25,730 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chroniclesLO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.