Channel
@chronic_surgeon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,326subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001913506653 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chronic_surgeon |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chronic_surgeon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 1,326 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 1,324 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 1,323 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 1,327 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 1,327 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
363 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 117 | 32.2% | |
| ❤ | 110 | 30.3% | |
| 😁 | 52 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 51 | 14.0% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 4.68% | |
| 🫡 | 10 | 2.75% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.826% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.551% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.275% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 363reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Йоханга, мальчишки и девчонки! Целых две недели я буду откисать в отпуске, и почти не ходить на работу. Какое-то время контента не будет, зато потом - будет) в сусеках есть интересненькие клинические случаи! Пишите письма, ставьте лайки, подписывайтесь на канал
❤49🔥13🫡3😁1
Вот такой диалог с пациентом раскопал из былого..) ну, за синхронность мысли! 🍻
😁51❤21🆒2🍾1
Операция по поводу грыжи пищеводного отверстия диафрагмы у пациента, которому в январе 24 года я делал лап левостороннюю гемигепатэктомию. Стоит заметить, что в поддиафрагмальном пространстве работать значительно удобнее, когда нет левой доли!)
👍11🔥5❤3
D3 лимфодиссекция по поводу рака нижней трети сигмовидной кишки. Красненьким отмечена аорта и нижняя брыжеечная артерия, желтеньким - узлы
🔥22❤1🫡1
Аппендикулярная пластика правого мочеточника по поводу протяжённой постлучевой стриктуры. На видео этапы: 1. Мобилизация червеобразного отростка на его брыжеечке; 2. Пересечение мочеточника; 3. Формирование проксимального анастомоза
🔥16👍2❤1
https://t.me/surgeryno/1611
❤5🔥1
Вашему вниманию неорганная опухоль полости малого таза у молодого мужчины. Есть мнение, что это может оказаться семиномой, исходящей из когда-то неопустившегося яичка
😱17🔥5👍2
А так - левой.
👍9🫡2
Последние пару лет для клипирования почти всех сосудов в той хирургии, которой занимаюсь, я использую гемолок (или аналоги) с клипсой XL (коричневый картридж), и считаю её универсальной. Конечно, она маловата для почечных вен, поэтому мне нравится вот такой приёмчик - подтянуть и сморщить вену на лигатуре и застегнуть клипсу) Вот так это выглядит при обработке правой почечной ножки
👍21🔥9❤1🫡1
А вот и гистология пришла: " Гистологическая картина десмоидного фиброматоза из веретеновидных и овоидных клеток в коллагенозной строме, с мономорфными ядрами, без атипии, единичные неатипичные митозы (менее 2 митозов в 10 пзбу)"
🔥12👀3👍3
Макропрепарат вдогонку предыдущим постам. Обратите внимание на инвазию опухоли в ДПК - вон какой дефектище, удивительно, что не было кровотечения в анамнезе. А, ну и камень в холецистите, не зря отрезали)
🔥29❤6
И таки да
❤23🔥5👍3🫡3
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @chronic_surgeon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хроники провинциального хирурга” (@chronic_surgeon), 1,326 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chronic_surgeon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.