Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Christo Grozev's Twitter

Channel

Christo Grozev's Twitter

@christo_grozev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

624subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001782678440
TypeChannel
Username@christo_grozev
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/christo_grozev

Growth

624625624.57 August 2026 — 625 subscribers7 August 2026 — 625 subscribers15 August 2026 — 624 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 624–625 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:33624-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:01625no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:54625first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 June 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

116 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁4740.5%
👍2219.0%
1412.1%
🔥1210.3%
🫡108.62%
💩32.59%
👌21.72%
😢21.72%
🥰21.72%
🙏10.862%
🤯10.862%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2023 to 1 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jul 2023, 05:26 UTC≈2,650 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tw2tg_updates

📣 Well, it looks to be over. 📣 Tonight, without any prior announcements, Twitter has disabled any access to tweets withot login. This means that the bot can't retrieve the data anymore, so I am shutting it down. I'll keep the channels, but there will be no updates unless Twitter reverses its decision or I will find a way to bypass this limitation (which is unlikely). It's very ironic and sad to see how two big pla

🫡10👌2👍2🥰2😢21🤯1

30 Jun 2023, 16:41 UTC≈2,610 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

(#) Prigozhin being bailed out by Lukashenko and now parked in Belarus with everyone guessing is one of the best season finale cliffhangers. Can't wait for the new season, right after the summer break.

😁8👍1

30 Jun 2023, 15:56 UTC≈2,220 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

(#) Oh the irony. RIA FAN, Prigozhin's fake news agency that initiated the designation of @bellingcat as "undesirable" and its blocking in Russia, has been blocked in Russia.

😁11

28 Jun 2023, 15:56 UTC≈1,820 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​(#) As I said on @OutFrontCNN last night, we discovered a surge of panicky midnight communication between FSB, GRU and FSO already the night of 22 to 23 June, a full day before Prigozhin launched the coup attempt. This report may explain why. Bojan Pancevski: Scoop: Wagner's Prigozhin planned to capture Russia's military leadership as part of his mutiny but had to rush the operation after Russian intelligence FSB le

👍3🙏1

27 Jun 2023, 14:56 UTC≈1,240 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

(#) Lukashenko confirmed Prigozhin arrival in Belarus, says Wagnerites "welcome to stay here for a while, at their own expense of course". Of course, this implausible thriller looks even more surreal when you remember how he freaked out the first time Wagnerites showed up in Belarus (#) That mad 2020 prologue was memorialized in this @bellingcat investigation: bellingcat.com/news/uk-and-eu… (#) @bellingcat P.S. Luk

👍2

26 Jun 2023, 20:11 UTC≈1,060 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​(#) Excellent, from @TimothyDSnyder open.substack.com/pub/snyder/p/p…

12👍1

24 Jun 2023, 17:11 UTC921 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

(#) Russian air force have been bombing Russian bridges today...to prevent Wagner's march on to Moscow

🔥3

24 Jun 2023, 16:26 UTC765 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

(#) Scooters and RPG launchers are a very jarring combination.

😁1

24 Jun 2023, 12:56 UTC680 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

(#) Russians shelled a residential area of Voronezh.

💩2😁2

24 Jun 2023, 12:42 UTC616 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

(#) Allegedly the moment RuAf hit Wagner's convoy - the one Prigozhin described.

🔥3👍1

24 Jun 2023, 12:42 UTC576 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

(#) Mutinies at various prisons and detention centers reported, one at the detention center Vodnik in Moscow where @vkaramurza is held.

🔥2

24 Jun 2023, 12:26 UTC575 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

(#) Putin's plane left for St Petersburg, and Peskov promptly denied Putin leaving Moscow, which in good old Russian tradition assured the population Putin has left Moscow.

😁10

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @christo_grozev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Christo Grozev's Twitter” (@christo_grozev), 624 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/christo_grozev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.