16-летний подросток утонул в Ковском карьере в Шахтах. Вечером 15 августа он ушёл кататься на велосипеде с друзьями и домой не вернулся. Днём 16 августа тело подростка нашли в карьере, где купание запрещено. ‼️ Подпишись на наш резервный канал Rostov News в Макс

Channel
ЧП Ростов Дон
@chp_rostov_don
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,941subscribers
+52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001156423673 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chp_rostov_don |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chp_rostov_don |
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 15,941 | +28 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 15,913 | +10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 15,903 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 15,900 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 15,897 | +6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 15,891 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 15,890 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 15,891 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 15,890 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 15,889 | first reading |
Engagement
134 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.08%
- avg views ÷ 15,941 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,130
- 134 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.435%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 134
- of 134 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 111 of 134 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 134 (5 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 151,335 |
| Reactions total | 573 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 16m 40s
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
573 reactions across 108 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 132 | 23.0% | |
| 😱 | 97 | 16.9% | |
| ❤ | 83 | 14.5% | |
| 👍 | 57 | 9.95% | |
| 😭 | 53 | 9.25% | |
| 🤡 | 29 | 5.06% | |
| 🤯 | 23 | 4.01% | |
| 🤮 | 22 | 3.84% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 3.32% | |
| 💩 | 16 | 2.79% | |
| 🙏 | 14 | 2.44% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 1.92% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 1.40% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.698% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.349% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.349% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.175% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 111 of the 134 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 573reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 5.97%
- 8 of 134 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 8
- posts carrying an erid · 8 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 859
- over 8 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 1,170
- over 126 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzquhNKh5 | 1 | 12 August 2026 | 12 August 2026 |
| 2VtzquzgxJf | 1 | 10 August 2026 | 10 August 2026 |
| 2Vtzqvggxa7 | 1 | 12 August 2026 | 12 August 2026 |
| 2Vtzqw47mfy | 1 | 16 August 2026 | 16 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqwBHFqm | 1 | 14 August 2026 | 14 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqwgnFHM | 1 | 10 August 2026 | 10 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqwyPGK5 | 1 | 13 August 2026 | 13 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqxJCa1R | 1 | 13 August 2026 | 13 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
❗️В ростовской многоэтажке из-за неисправной проводки загорелся холодильник В многоэтажке на 26-й Линии загорелся холодильник. Причиной возгорания стало короткое замыкание в удлинителе. В этот момент хозяева были в отъезде. Никто не пострадал. Прибывшие огнеборцы МЧС ликвидировали пожар на площади 5 кв. м. К тушению привлекались 16 специалистов и четыре единицы техники. ‼️ Подпишись на наш резервный канал Rostov …
🤯2
67-летний водитель «ВАЗа» погиб в лобовом ДТП на трассе «Шахты — Цимлянск» в Усть-Донецком районе вчера вечером — он выехал на встречную и столкнулся с другой легковой. Водитель второй машины и его пассажир пострадали. ‼️ Подпишись на наш резервный канал Rostov News в Макс
😱1
⚠️ЛЮБАЯ ТЕХНИКА СО СКИДКОЙ - 3.500 ₽ ТОЛЬКО СЕГОДНЯ В МАГАЗИНЕ APPMAG ☄️ Последний день в AppMag в честь яблочного Спаса на всю технику скидки до - 3.500 ₽ А ещё при покупке вы получаете СЧАСТЛИВЫЙ БИЛЕТИК-ЯБЛОЧКО и в придачу к скидке забираете гарантированный подарок 🎁 Главные подарки в билетиках всё ещё ждут своих обладателей, в том числе AirPods Pro 3! 🪱 Переходи в бот 👉 https://t.me/appmag_rostov_bot?start=t…
❤1
Мотоциклистов и самокатчиков массово проверяют в Ростове — за сутки инспекторы составили больше десяти протоколов, усиленные рейды продолжатся. Проверки проходят как в самой донской столице, так и на подъездах к городу. По данным областной Госавтоинспекции, особое внимание сейчас уделяют мотоциклам, другой мототехнике и средствам индивидуальной мобильности. За последние сутки инспекторы нашли больше десяти нарушен…
👍3🤬2
Мотоциклист на Ducati врезался в здание и загорелся после столкновения с «Газелью» в центре Ростова — водитель получил травмы. Авария произошла 15 августа около 14:28 возле дома № 92А на Будённовском проспекте. По предварительным данным полиции, 32-летний водитель Ducati Streetfighter ехал по выделенной полосе и попытался обогнать справа ГАЗ-32212. Во время манёвра мотоциклист не справился с управлением, столкнулс…
😱1
На аварийной гостинице «Московская» в Ростове заметили промышленного альпиниста — он вручную убирал обвисшие конструкции у крыши. Часть фасада со стороны Шаумяна уже закрыли защитной сеткой, но что именно делают со зданием — консервируют или просто убирают опасные элементы — официально не сообщается. Гостиница «Московская» закрыта с 2007 года после пожара, с тех пор она стоит заброшенной и скрытой за баннером. ‼️ …
👍2
Число погибших при ночной атаке выросло на два человека. Спасатели нашли их тела, сообщили власти. В Каменске-Шахтинском обломки БПЛА повредили жилые и административные здания. В пострадавших районах продолжаются ликвидация последствий и оценка ущерба. ‼️ Подпишись на наш резервный канал Rostov News в Макс
🤬7
❗ В результате воздушной атаки на Ростовскую область три человека погибли, еще один получил ранения и доставлен в больницу Всего в ходе отражения массированной вражеской атаки было уничтожено более 150 БПЛА и ракет в трех городах и 9 районах: Каменске-Шахтинском, Гуково, Донецке, Каменском, Константиновском, Миллеровском, Матвеево-Курганском, Чертковском, Шолоховском, Цимлянском, Тарасовском и Верхнедонском. Сейчас …
❤3😱3🤬2💔1🕊1🙏1
На Буденновском мотоциклист пытался обогнать справа «Газель», не справился с управлением и врезался в здание. Получил травмы. ‼️ Подпишись на наш резервный канал Rostov News в Макс
💩1😱1
Неосторожное курение стало причиной пожара в девятиэтажке Волгодонска. 13 августа на лестничной площадке между 7-м и 8-м этажами загорелось кресло. Жильцы сами потушили огонь. Никто не пострадал. ‼️ Подпишись на наш резервный канал Rostov News в Макс
❤2🤬1
Причиной стрельбы в Нахичевани оказалось замечание из-за выгула собаки без намордника. Полиция ищет стрелка. Конфликт быстро перерос из словесного в рукопашный. Прям на улице началась драка. В какой-то момент одному из стрит-файтеров рукопашки показалось мало – и он достал травматический пистолет, направил его на противника и несколько раз выстрелил. Это отбросило потерпевшего к воротам дома, но вернулся в бой, пос…
🤬6❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 134 posts we hold for @chp_rostov_don. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 158,144 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rostov_smi · 151,155
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
@privet_rostov_ru · 178,696
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@rostov_glavniy · 274,620
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
@rostov0 · 104,741
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧП Ростов Дон” (@chp_rostov_don), 15,941 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chp_rostov_don.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.