Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 寵尔~💗(私教)🌹

Channel

寵尔~💗(私教)🌹

@chonnger

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

46subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001915892031
TypeChannel
Username@chonnger
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 1 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/chonnger

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4648477 August 2026 — 48 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48 subscribers3 September 2026 — 47 subscribers27 September 2026 — 46 subscribers7 August 202627 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 51 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–48 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 15:3646-1
3 Sept 2026, 15:1847-1
10 Aug 2026, 12:4748no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:3848first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 1 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

146 reactions across 3 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4128.1%
🥰3826.0%
🔥2215.1%
👏2114.4%
👍138.90%
🤩117.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2023 to 11 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Mar 2024, 08:28 UTC258 views73 reactionsread 10 August 2026

出击报告 https://t.me/gscqs 验证留名:巴黎 上课时间:3.11 老师花名:寵尔 Chone er 位置坐标:#南山 上课花费:1200p 颜值身材:身高167.天然c 服务内容:课表 出击体验:关注了一段时间,看报告评论都说老师很好,早就想来试试,今天恰巧有时间,虽然说距离有点儿远,好在不枉费我跨了半个深圳来这一趟,非常满意的出击,说实话玩了这么多,已经有了人照大打折的心理预期,但是这次开门惊喜到了,小姐姐和照片无差别,身材非常棒,胸部丰满,比例也很棒,满满的青春活力。很能勾起欺负的欲望,老师敏感度高,桩的时候表情和声音真实,又很会说骚话,很有成就感。事后,我们还躺床上休息闲聊了好久,出门还给我一个大大的拥抱,一定会返食的 推荐程度:满分 联系方式:@q378991 投稿联系: @cqs08

🥰26❤14🔥14👏11👍6🤩2

11 Mar 2024, 05:47 UTC199 views71 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

这两天下雨,天气又转凉了,没有人关心,还是自己学会爱自己吧!

❤25🥰12👏10🤩9🔥8👍7

10 Mar 2024, 05:54 UTC269 viewsread 10 August 2026

南山,有🏠,🉑️外,粉嫩少女🍑🉑️漫游,69.🐍,胸推……服务多多,乖巧听话

6 Mar 2024, 08:07 UTC194 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

无聊的时候,发点库存,🥰只为等你回来到来

11 Dec 2023, 04:37 UTC250 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

深圳的宝贝,你亲爱的我又回来咯

1 Sept 2023, 05:36 UTC518 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

好久没发动态了,宝子们还以为我不在呢!约起来,今天头课还在!

❤2

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @chonnger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“寵尔~💗(私教)🌹” (@chonnger), 46 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chonnger.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.