
Channel
πΦ πΉ π ²Ι¦β±ΊπΌβ±ΊΟππΎκπα₯£π'π π¦ πΏ
@chocopiemilks
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
5,801subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 17 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002198863710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chocopiemilks |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chocopiemilks |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:26 | 5,801 | +22 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:55 | 5,779 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:11 | 5,781 | +10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:45 | 5,771 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:18 | 5,772 | -16 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:19 | 5,788 | -6 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 06:49 | 5,794 | -16 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 04:59 | 5,810 | -21 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 09:59 | 5,831 | -6 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 5,837 | -5 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 5,842 | no change |
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:47 | 5,842 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured β we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@millkycakke_chanell Β· 70,403
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 15 here β alongside 14 others β read 17 September 2026
@pawpaw_chanel Β· 40,401
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 23 here β alongside 22 others β read 17 September 2026
@yupi_pinky20 Β· 22,138
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 30 here β alongside 29 others β read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπΦ πΉ π ²Ι¦β±ΊπΌβ±ΊΟππΎκπα₯£π'π π¦ πΏβ (@chocopiemilks), 5,801 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chocopiemilks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.