Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шльондри Волині

Channel

Шльондри Волині

@chljondruvolyny

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,497subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001486655498
TypeChannel
Username@chljondruvolyny
Created22 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chljondruvolyny

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4641,4971,480.57 August 2026 — 1,464 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,464 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,465 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,471 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,476 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,478 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,479 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,478 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,476 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,478 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,484 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,490 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,497 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,459–1,502 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:171,497+7
14 Sept 2026, 10:371,490+6
11 Sept 2026, 02:371,484+6
6 Sept 2026, 08:381,478+2
30 Aug 2026, 11:531,476-2
27 Aug 2026, 05:421,478-1
24 Aug 2026, 15:381,479+1
20 Aug 2026, 15:021,478+2
17 Aug 2026, 16:051,476+5
14 Aug 2026, 17:231,471+6
8 Aug 2026, 11:251,465+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:011,464no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:481,464first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

183 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁6937.7%
💯3418.6%
👍2714.8%
179.29%
🤣137.10%
🔥116.01%
🤔42.19%
💩21.09%
😢21.09%
🤬21.09%
💘10.546%
🤡10.546%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC392 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ручні телеграм канали партії Замайбах Ігоря Палиці розганяють брехню про те, що Романа Романюка замінять на посаді голови ОВА. Це фейк. Їм треба прибрати неугодного чиновника, який перебуває на своєму місці і вправно робить свою роботу.

🤔2🤡1

7 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC440 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Радник міського голови Луцька розписується в тому що влада Луцька не здатна зробити місто доступним для людей з інвалідністю. За скільки років не змогли зробити навіть прості пониження на всіх тротуарах. Територія біля обласної клінічної лікарні залишається мінним полем для людей з ампутаціями нижніх кінцівок. Невже влада дійсно дзеркало народу?

👍1

29 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,100 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Авансцену змінюють ляльки. Вистава мусить тривати.

💯9

29 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,050 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Можна було б щось написати про те як лучанам насцяли в очі, але нема сенсу. Жуйте

💯9🔥21

29 Jul 2026, 17:19 UTC≈1,080 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

За моїми даними Шкльоду пішли, бо вона не підкорялася вказівкам партійних босів і їхніх схемщиків.

💯8😁6

27 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC≈1,130 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Свобода це вас не боягузи якісь. Це справжні націоналісти

😁12💘1

27 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC≈1,020 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В Луцькому політичному болоті свої проблеми - деяких наближених до Палиці не влаштовує Шкльода і тепер шукають шляхи її змістити.

😁6

23 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC≈1,460 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Папа в Луцьку? Кажуть, що приїхав на день народження Григорія

😁9👍3

23 Jul 2026, 06:08 UTC≈1,360 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Цікаво скільки волинян знають, що за людина фото і скільки з них знають,що це цілий голова Волинської обласної ради? Сьогодні підлабузники будуть вітати його і розхвалювати, але ніхто не скаже правди, що обласна рада за каденції голови перетворилася на придаток для ухвалення шкірних рішень депутатів і Палиці.

😁3👍2💩2

19 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC≈1,570 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нема на цих фото з Луцька і депутатів міської ради. Бо цей неліквід теж нікому не треба. Особливо дивно, що нема вічних революціонерів і 30тисячників з Свободи. Радикали срані.

7😁4🔥1

19 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC≈1,340 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

І Ігоря не візьмуть в партію Федорова 😄😄😄😄

😁6

19 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC≈1,290 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ні одного нардепа з Волині. Що і не дивно, бо цих зашкварених корупціонерів в партію Федорова не візьмуть. Максимум що ви світить чергова шарага з Батенком на чолі. І політичне забуття.

🔥82

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chljondruvolyny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Волинські Новини
@volyn_news · 66,207
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
ЛУЧИК повідомляє (важливе про Луцьк, Україну і світ)
@luchyk_info · 41,026
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
Новини Луцька та Волині. Конкурент
@konkurentinua · 68,285
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Типовий Луцьк
@lutsk_tipical · 62,610
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Вечірній Луцьк - новини Луцька, Волині, України, світу
@vechirnij_lutsk · 41,312
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
Повістки Луцьк Волинська область
@lutskpovistka · 69,406
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 20 August 2026
Луцьк⚡️Труха
@truexaluck · 107,578
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Volynblog (Луцьк•Ковель•Володимир)
@volynblog · 112,272
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026
Суспільне Луцьк
@suspilne_lutsk · 26,972
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
Хуйовий Луцьк
@h_lutsk · 30,208
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 7 September 2026
Нововолинськ інфо
@nv_info · 27,297
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 11 September 2026
Твій Володимир🇺🇦
@tvoe_v_v · 59,925
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шльондри Волині” (@chljondruvolyny), 1,497 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chljondruvolyny.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.