Photo, posted without a caption
👍7🤯3🥰1
Signed hyb

Channel
@chiyuangxpd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
17,787subscribers
+616 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002152805047 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chiyuangxpd |
| Description | 这是频道,不是聊天群组。聊天群 t.me/chiyuangx 本频道发布的信息成分复杂,含有辅助,直装,网络热梗等等。 |
| Created | 24 July 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chiyuangxpd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 17,787 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 17,790 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:09 | 17,785 | +25 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 17,760 | +17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 17,743 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 17,736 | +19 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 17,717 | +21 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 17,696 | +46 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 17,650 | +62 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 17,588 | +44 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 17,544 | +15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 17,529 | +10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 17,519 | +18 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 17,501 | +35 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 17,466 | +12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 17,454 | +31 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 17,423 | +69 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 17,354 | +19 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 17,335 | +42 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 17,293 | first reading |
148 posts held, back to 24 July 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 128 of 129 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 148 (24 July 2024 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 297,606 |
| Reactions total | 2,128 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 02:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,128 reactions across 128 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,395 | 65.6% | |
| ❤ | 274 | 12.9% | |
| 🖕 | 88 | 4.14% | |
| 🤯 | 87 | 4.09% | |
| 🤮 | 33 | 1.55% | |
| 😭 | 32 | 1.50% | |
| 🤓 | 32 | 1.50% | |
| ❤🔥 | 26 | 1.22% | |
| 😱 | 26 | 1.22% | |
| 🥰 | 26 | 1.22% | |
| 👎 | 22 | 1.03% | |
| 💩 | 18 | 0.846% | |
| 🍌 | 15 | 0.705% | |
| 🤡 | 14 | 0.658% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 0.517% | |
| 😡 | 6 | 0.282% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.235% | |
| 🌭 | 4 | 0.188% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.188% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 0.141% | |
| 3 further kinds | 7 | 0.329% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 148 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2024 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍7🤯3🥰1
Signed hyb
啥运
🤡8👍2😱2
Signed 池鸳
Cy通知频道 pinned «启动插件官网 www.chiyuana.com»
启动插件官网 www.chiyuana.com
👍11🤣2
Signed 池鸳
兄弟们最后一晚了,不起飞是真对不起你的小兄弟了😂😂😂
👍14🤣5❤1
Signed 池鸳
福利已发,在启动插件用户信息页内领取。
👍5
Signed 池鸳
666,刷方块不是和谐了吗,还有高手
👍16🤯2❤1
Signed 池鸳
有次数的尽量别抢,让点给没次数的。
👍19❤2🥰1
Signed 池鸳
8月31号下午一点再送500份下载次数*10次卡密,一人一份,手慢无。
👍19❤2🥰2
Signed 池鸳
Posted without readable text
🖕19❤3🌭1👍1
Signed 池鸳
正在恢复了,大概几个小时内同步。
👍14
Signed 池鸳
NB啊,每天凌晨三点半打服务器,可以可以
👍15😡5
Signed 池鸳
Showing the 12 most recent of 148 posts we hold for @chiyuangxpd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
爱吃薯片还是薯条
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
需要Tg也弄一个Tg机器人吗,主要是没其他号了😂,QQ机器人麻烦就麻烦在小号容易被封。
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2024 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cy通知频道” (@chiyuangxpd), 17,787 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chiyuangxpd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.