5 measurements spanning 22 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 280–281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 17:37
280
-1
15 Aug 2026, 15:23
281
+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:47
280
-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:32
281
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:02
281
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 3 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
389 reactions across 12 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
156
40.1%
🔥
75
19.3%
🤩
31
7.97%
👍
25
6.43%
custom 5301222663950188450
22
5.66%
custom 5242258651376268793
14
3.60%
custom 5363997253113500031
14
3.60%
🥰
11
2.83%
😁
10
2.57%
💯
7
1.80%
❤🔥
5
1.29%
⚡
4
1.03%
✍
3
0.771%
👏
3
0.771%
💅
3
0.771%
😱
3
0.771%
🌚
1
0.257%
👀
1
0.257%
👻
1
0.257%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 389reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2024 to 21 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
38
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 13 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chit_chat_eng. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 November 2024 to 21 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Недавно мы с друзьями вернулись из поездки в горы (фотокарточки прилагаются). А вскоре после этого я наткнулась на фильм про восхождение на одну из самых неприступных гор в Андах — и он меня захватил.
Фильм основан на реальных событиях 1985 года. Двое молодых парней-альпинистов из Англии решают сделать то, что до них не удавалось никому — покорить вершину, которая считалась невозможной. Сначала все идет более-менее …
I'M BAAAACK
Как-то волнительно возвращаться в канал после перерыва. Но я его лублу, поэтому снова здесь. Не хочу с порога закидывать вас новостями — давайте лучше начнем с интересной языковой штуки, как в старые добрые?
Одно из моих любимых занятий в свободное время - это копаться в этимологии слов и находить какие-то совпадения или неординарности. Сегодня будет именно такой пост.
Поговорим про слово opportunity -…
I’m in my Harry Potter rewatching era, и инстаграм подкидывает мне очень много видео, связанных с фильмом 🧡
2 классных выражения из видео:
eager beaver - трудяга, работяга. beaver - это бобр 🦫
pour your heart into - вкладывать душу
Пример,
🟠She is an eager beaver, she always pours her heart into every project she takes on, inspiring the whole team with her dedication.
P.S. Смотрите, какие классные стикеры с Гарр…
Еще один "звездный" факт заказывали? 🐱
Спасибо всем за реакции на прошлый пост — я прямо загорелась написать еще! Если вам такое интересно, другие истории о словах можно почитать по тегу #funfact.
Сегодня снова начнем с латинского слова, sidus или его формы sideris, которое означает "звезда" или "созвездие."
⭐️ От этого слова происходит глагол considerare (напоминает что-то знакомое?). В древние времена он имел ве…
Что там звезды говорят? 🌟
🧙♂️Давным-давно люди пытались предсказывать будущее по звездам, прошло много лет, наука шагнула вперед, …. и ничего не поменялось. Может быть, мы не читаем гороскопы, но фразы про звезды очень прочно засели в языке. Звезды не сложились, звезды сошлись и так далее.
Недавно наткнулась на интересный #funfact про слово disaster (бедствие, катастрофа) и его неожиданно звездное прошлое. Делюсь!…
Practicing advice from the video every single day 🦉
Запоминайте классное выражение:
slingshot you back into reality - вернет (откинет) тебя в реальность
slingshot - рогатка
Например,
🟠After a relaxing weekend away from work, the pile of emails waiting for me on Monday morning was enough to slingshot me back into reality.
Ставьте вафлю 🧇, если планируете прикупить over-priced кофе сегодня
Winter arc ❄️ vs. cosy vibes 🍂
Привет всем! У нас тут обычно уютно-вдохновляюще и интересно-познавательно. Если вам такое надо, то есть все шансы, что мы будем классно проводить время вместе :) Буду благодарна за ваш отклик к постам!
Недавно увидела, что в англоязычном инстаграм вируситься тренд с названием winter arc.
The Winter Arc is ‘A time where every man must face the mental and physical challenges of winter…
Еще не Новый год, но уже время подарков 🌟
Я уже много раз писала на канале, как важно окружать себя языком, который вы учите. И сегодня я хочу поделиться супер-новостью!
Вместе с коллегами мы решили разыграть 2 экземпляра книги на английском языке и еще один специальный подарок. Подробности будут ниже. Но от себя добавлю, что эта книга подарила мне новый взгляд на многие вещи и она точно стоит вашего внимания ❤️
В…
То, что я делаю на видео, называется shadowing. (справедливости ради, на видео я просто повторяю реплику из кино, но я копирую интонацию и скорость речи героя). Можно посмотреть оригинальный отрывок и сравнить, если хотите.
Shadowing - моя любимая практика для работы над произношением. Хочу сегодня рассказать, что это за зверь и как его приручить. #learningtips
Начнем с базы. Мой помощник (chat gpt) говорит, что sh…
Готовлюсь к ежегодному пересмотру лучшего фильма33%
Тренирую произношению65%
Пытаюсь накрасить губы))35%
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @chit_chat_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Готовлюсь к ежегодному пересмотру лучшего фильма33%
Тренирую произношению65%
Пытаюсь накрасить губы))35%
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2024 to 21 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“to: english lovers 💌” (@chit_chat_eng), 280 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chit_chat_eng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
