5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,972–7,031 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 02:28
6,979
-14
10 Aug 2026, 09:33
6,993
-23
7 Aug 2026, 06:01
7,016
-8
6 Aug 2026, 10:20
7,024
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:00
7,024
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 1 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 51s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,738 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😢
1,179
31.5%
💔
1,066
28.5%
❤
501
13.4%
custom 5298956196823184118
229
6.13%
👍
118
3.16%
🙏
114
3.05%
❤🔥
103
2.76%
🤡
78
2.09%
🔥
75
2.01%
👏
60
1.61%
🏆
57
1.52%
😁
32
0.856%
🤣
24
0.642%
💘
23
0.615%
😍
20
0.535%
🤬
20
0.535%
🤯
14
0.375%
👎
12
0.321%
👀
9
0.241%
💯
4
0.107%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,738reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2025 to 23 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chisto_mfc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 March 2025 to 23 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
26 июля в 12:00 на стадионе «Невский Фронт» состоится матч памяти экс-нападающего «Чисто Питера» — Сергея Маркова.
В этом событии примут участие футболисты, выступавшие за медийную команду «Чисто Питер». Мы соберемся впервые за полгода, чтобы вместе почтить память настоящего человека и выдающегося нападающего.
Вход свободный — ждем вас!
Адрес: Санкт-Петербург, ул. Пражская, 30, корп. 3
⚽️ @chisto_mfc
Вчера не стало экс-нападающего нашей команды — Сергея Маркова.
Такие новости невозможно принимать. Мара был настоящим человеком. Он всегда был рядом. Душа компании, весельчак, наполняющий каждого своим позитивом.
Мы выражаем искренние соболезнования родным и близким Серёжи.
Помочь его семье можно и нужно с помощью реквизитов ниже.
89998203210 (Сбербанк, Кирилл Сергеевич М.)
👏 Какой момент для вас самый запоминающийся в истории «ЧП»?
Делитесь своими комментариями под новым роликом «ЧП ДВИЖ», а победитель получит вратарскую форму первого сезона — за лучший вариант!
📺 СМОТРЕТЬ НА YOUTUBE
💙 СМОТРЕТЬ В ВК ВИДЕО
⚽️ @chisto_mfc
🗣️ ИЛЬЯ БАЛАКИРЕВ — О ПРИОСТАНОВКЕ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ «ЧИСТО ПИТЕРА»:
«Решение о приостановке деятельности клуба было принято, потому что у нас закончился контракт с главным спонсором — в конце прошлого года. Все это время мы пытались найти варианты для того, чтобы существовать, участвовать в МФЛ-6, но в итоге приняли такое решение.
Долго не было понимания по будущему, так как я сам не хотел с этим мириться, сдаваться, и…
Медийная команда «Чисто Питер» пропустит ближайший сезон Медиалиги
Как правило, в таких текстах дальше следуют сухие формулировки: было принято такое-то решение, и оно не объясняется. Оно не подводит никаких итогов, ни о чем не говорит и заставляет аудиторию задаться простым вопросов — почему это произошло?
Возможно, всем будет пофиг — в шугарах, некласиках и крысевах напишут — «туда их», «серая команда», «ничем не…
🗣️ «Как говорит Денис Дмитриевич, нужно делать то, что умеешь. Я умею врезаться головой в соперника — показал это!», — maXos — о своем вкладе в победу.
👏👏👏
⚽️ @chisto_mfc
🧤 «Прервалась моя серия с максимальной точностью передач? Это ужас!», — Сантьяго Федос — об итогах вчерашнего матча.
Поддержите легенду в комментариях!
⚽️ @chisto_mfc
🥚 «Это в 10 раз больнее, чем все, что я испытал во время боя против Гуди!», — Балу — о своем выходе на поле и героическом спасении.
Илья, браво! 👏
⚽️ @chisto_mfc
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @chisto_mfc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 74,939 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@chisto_mfc named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@santiago_fed0s named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Футбольный клуб «Зенит» @fczenit · 198,587 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МФК «Чисто Питер»” (@chisto_mfc), 6,979 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chisto_mfc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
