وەرە کەپڵ بگرە😂🥺💘

Channel
𝐷𝐸𝑅_𝐵𝑂𝑁 ☹︎
@chinar7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
15subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001541206496 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chinar7 |
| Description | خئرهاتن بو جيهانا دير بونئ ☹︎ دەمێ راستیا ناخێ مروڤان بوتە دیار دبیت دێ تێگەھی و زانی جوانیێ چ بھایێ خو نەبوو! “ 🖤 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chinar7 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 15 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 15 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 82
- Videos
- 25
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 24s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
وەرن شەرە😂🥺!
وەرنە تێل شەڕە کچە🥺😂💛.
قلت دەوێ قل🥺😂🧿!
ناوتـﹳ بە مۆمـﹳ بنوسە"هـﹳ !🕯🤍!
وەرن شەرە😂🥺!
چەناڵێڪ تایبەت بە پۆستے بێے لۆگۆ"ھ🤍🖇! @nusrawa_kanm 🖤🦦
چەناڵێڪ تایبەت بە پۆستے بێے لۆگۆ"ھ🤍🖇! @nusrawa_kanm 🖤🦦
وەرنە تێل شەڕە کچە🥺😂💛.
وەرنە تێل شەڕە کچە🥺😂💛.
قلت دەوێ قل🥺😂🧿!
بەناوی خـوای گـەورەو میهرەبـان 🌻💛 • شـازتـࢪین چـەنـاڵـەکـانـے تـێـلیـگـرام🤎🪐 • هەر چیت بوێت لێرە دەست دەکەوێت🥂🍓 • بــۆ ئـەوەیے بــاشـتࢪیـن و جــوانـتࢪیـن چـەنـاڵ ببینے جۆیـنے ئـەمـ چەناڵانـە بڪە🤍! سـەرەتا چـەناڵەکانـمـ 🌚🖤! ✯ @Nusrawa_Kanm |نـوسراوەڪـانم|✯ ✯ @Xayal_1 خەیاڵەکـان ✯ ✯ @Text_Msto_1 تێڪستەکان ✯ ✯ @Photo_msto وێـنـە ✯ ✯ @Nigr4ny_tOm ڕازی من ✯ ─━━━━━━⊱🤍⊰━━━━━━─ 🔗🖤• @xayal_1 گـۆڕستانے مستـۆ 🔗🖤• @…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chinar7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,038,746 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@addict1000 · 221 post𝑵𝑨𝑿𝑬ᵏᶜʰᵉᵏ🙇♀️💜
@ashqakamannn · 281 postخٰ̐ہـەیـآڵـەکـآنَِہـمـ 🌸❥˓
@bazmi_shawann · 591 postبـەرلـیـن 📒🖤
@berrlin7 · 911 post00:00 🚸!
@Cal_forn · 311 postیــــــــاســــەمـــیــن🤎.
@diganist · 3,3341 postدٰڵبٰہٰٖەرٰی دٰڵخٰہٰٖرٰاٰپ 💔❗
@dlbari_xrap · 321 post𝐃𝐋𝐄 𝐌𝐍 𖠛
@dle_mnn · 1061 post💔
@drokany_0 · 1321 post𝘥𝘳𝘶𝘹 🖤
@Dru1x · 1551 post﮼لەخۆرازی
@egogir1 · 2231 postئیشق 🤍-
@eshq_139 · 1431 postشێخ بەڵێن😂💔
@hasr4tymn · 651 post𝐻𝑎𝑠𝑇𝑒 𝑇𝑜𝑂🌚💔.!
@hasteto · 1481 postھیچ 🕊️:/¹⁸
@im_rayo0 · 741 post﮼مانگ🌚»
@m0onam · 7141 postSᕼIfᗩ 💗"
@MA_RD0_Sv_me · 571 postنٰ
@naskola_1 · 1381 post𝐍𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐲 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐤𝐚𝐧𝐭
@nigay_chawakant · 2,6721 post🖤!•﮼نەفەس
@nnaf4s · 1621 post•𝗩𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼+𝗣𝗵𝗼𝘁𝗼 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗘𝗱𝗶𝘁🖤.
@photostar1 · 4191 postشارەزوری
@pro_sharazuri · 1021 post┋𝑄𝒛𝒉 𝑍𝒂𝒓𝒅🪫💛•
@qzh_z4rd · 1371 post𝚁𝙰𝙱𝚁𝙳𝚄🖤!
@Rabrdwu · 8021 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 14
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 14
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@chinar7 named 14 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐷𝐸𝑅_𝐵𝑂𝑁 ☹︎” (@chinar7), 15 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chinar7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.