顺便说一句,是的,我有一个推特/x帐户,但没有人知道它,一些好的和大的KOLS跟踪了我,但X被禁止了,我的帐户也因为VPN和所有原因被禁止了。 所以,不要上当受骗,我的朋友,因为很少有人联系我。所以再说一遍,我没有运行任何TWITTER/X帐户,但我这个月会调查一下。
Signed Stress disorder Verify@

Channel
@chinacryptohunter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
525subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001908291673 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chinacryptohunter |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chinacryptohunter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 525 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 532 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 532 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
顺便说一句,是的,我有一个推特/x帐户,但没有人知道它,一些好的和大的KOLS跟踪了我,但X被禁止了,我的帐户也因为VPN和所有原因被禁止了。 所以,不要上当受骗,我的朋友,因为很少有人联系我。所以再说一遍,我没有运行任何TWITTER/X帐户,但我这个月会调查一下。
Signed Stress disorder Verify@
此外,我没有任何付费的私人。我不是来拿你的钱的。相反,我是来为你赚钱的!不要上当受骗,他们试图向你出售付费私人团体加入。他们都是骗子和冒名顶替者,声称和我关系很好
Signed Stress disorder Verify@
那些骗子找到你并要钱。我没有任何其他频道。 坚持原版👉https://t.me/chinacryptohunter 我没有任何alt帐户。 只有这个👉@StressDisorder
大家早上好。 注意我的冒名顶替者。他们都是骗子。举报他们,不要上他们的当受骗! 举报这个骗子👉@StressDisorder
$AXI DeFi的智能交易领先工具中心。提供广泛的集线器,包括完全可定制的dApp,以及触手可及的验证扩展。 受到500多名用户的信任 CA:0x7059161a6BeCFce54E8BBd565C11019f2bF54994 社交: Https://t.me/AxiraAI Https://x.com/AxiraAI Https://axira.tools Https://app.axira.tools Https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x0f8ef0b8dafb4b9948ee1edabd71003026327f76 186k mc
加密货币不再像过去那样。 因此,不要指望这些天能在一夜之间或几小时内获得 2 倍到 10-20 倍的增长。 尽量自己做研究,专注于2-3个项目。尽量把项目数量最大化。 我指的是那些标题为“Aped to”、“Alpha”、“Long Term”、“Gem”、“Utility”的……而不是那些赌博式的degen。玩degens,你必须充满运气!你也需要运气…… 因此,这几周、几个月里,请坚持 alpha、gem 和 utility 游戏……
Aped Pepe $Lore its @ 350k mc 「疑似由Matt Furie創造的神秘起源:https://x.com/matt_furie/status/1472077993933631489 每個人都知道Pepe,但只有少數人知道傳說。 🐸 抖音上的3000萬瀏覽量:https://www.tiktok.com/@pepeloresus/video/7229962068231736602 僅Pepe Lore在YouTube上就總共瀏覽量超過600萬次。」 CA:0x336543840B64AE7326A94bC48A503D20786e4750 TG:t.me/PepeLoreToken
近幾個月來,事情發生了巨大的變化。 舊標準——比如說一個專案有一個強大的開發人員、一個堅實的團隊或達到1億美元以上的記錄——不再有分量。 如今,這都是關於敘事的。 如果一個專案有一個引人注目的故事,它就會起飛。 如果沒有,團隊有多好並不重要——那些經典臺詞不再適用。 這很難,但這就是現實。 我們見過像亞歷克斯·貝克爾這樣的有影響力的人推廣一個專案,並將其從1000萬美元的上限推到1300萬美元——沒有任何真正的基本面。 這就是為什麼我最近沒有分享很多專案。 或者當我有的時候,他們的表現並不好,儘管他們背後的團隊真的很穩固。 大多數專案都堅持不了幾天。 這是退化季節——現在不是關於長期效用或ETH遊戲。 展望未來,一個專案僅僅擁有一個好的團隊是不夠的。 我正在評估更多因素——速度很重要。 我會耐心地等待,並繼續挖掘真正的機會。 只是想分享一下事情的情況。
大家晚安❤️ 明天我們做飯。
早安,我珍貴的追隨者。 我醒來時聽到你們中的一些人發來的幾條資訊,表達了對BONDS團隊崎嶇的擔憂。 讓我們澄清一下: 地毯拉扯涉及從團隊錢包中去除流動性或傾銷。 一切都在鏈上——請隨意自己驗證。 這一切都沒有發生。 也就是說,該專案確實面臨著嚴重的銷售壓力。 雖然它背後的團隊以阿爾法遊戲而聞名,但一些有影響力的人選擇完全退出他們的位置,這對圖表產生了重大影響。 請理解——我沒有參與你們許多人立即進入的私人銷售。 在看到早期的興趣後,我決定支援這個專案。 事實上,我是第一個公開打電話的人,給你最好的入場券。 一些行動迅速的人看到了接近10倍的回報。 如果你沒有獲利,那是學習曲線的一部分——這不是我可以責備的事情。 該團隊將稅收定為0/0,自然,許多人——包括有影響力的人——都賣了。 作為回應,該團隊將大約10個ETH投入回購,非官方錢包的額外支援又貢獻了10多個ETH。 鄭重宣告,我從收到的分配中沒有賣出一個代幣。 …
Gems of Xian 王调用🐳🇨🇳 pinned Deleted message
$LPENGU 在这场 sol 游戏中赌一把..故事情节不错,背后有优秀的团队..让我们看看进展如何 90k https://opensea.io/collection/lilpudgys https://pump.fun/coin/Evenwqqc4uBA5NueXGSvp6uei4SjfnyK6DtThzK2AWM9 https://t.me/LilPudgyssol
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chinacryptohunter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@chinacryptohunter named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gems of Xian 王调用🐳🇨🇳” (@chinacryptohunter), 525 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chinacryptohunter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.