Channel
@chimaev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8,916subscribers
-152 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003447259495 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chimaev |
| Created | 6 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chimaev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 8,916 | -88 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 9,004 | -50 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 9,054 | -14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 9,068 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 9,068 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 6 December 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
8,491 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,192 | 25.8% | |
| custom 5345935030143196497 | 1,513 | 17.8% | |
| 🔥 | 1,281 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5305456427962238104 | 1,140 | 13.4% | |
| 👍 | 1,131 | 13.3% | |
| custom 5424616516018537963 | 497 | 5.85% | |
| 👏 | 365 | 4.30% | |
| custom 5308052937556136027 | 190 | 2.24% | |
| custom 5305312572327624640 | 182 | 2.14% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,491reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 10 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥊 "The road to success is paved with small setbacks" — and that’s just the beginning; together, we can achieve so much more
custom 5305456427962238104198custom 542461651601853796365custom 534593503014319649743
🥊 I’ll give you some 🎄 among the people, who boost this channel. 🥊 https://t.me/boost/chimaev P.S. 🥊 Let's make 10 level boost and I'll give out more 🎄
custom 5345935030143196497340custom 5305456427962238104251custom 5424616516018537963162
Do you like 🎄❓
custom 53459350301431964971,130custom 5305456427962238104376custom 5424616516018537963270
🥊 Let's make level 5 and we'll choose the winner! P.S. the winner got his gift 🎁
custom 5305456427962238104315custom 5308052937556136027190custom 5305312572327624640182
🥊 Thank you for 50,000 subscribers! 🎁 I will give UFC Strike to one of those who will give a boost to this channel! 🥊 https://t.me/boost/chimaev
❤179👍104🔥98
Let's try to get 🥊🥊 https://t.me/auction/UFCStrike
❤150🔥98👏73
Posted without readable text
❤400🔥254👍217
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
❤776🔥440👏292
I always stay with my people. My family, my friends, my team. These are people that are always with me. Even in the worst moments of my life. Surprise your people with the gifts to make them happy.
👍810❤687🔥391
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @chimaev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 457,236 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@chimaev named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Khamzat Chimaev” (@chimaev), 8,916 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chimaev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.