https://t.me/fomonadotbiz

Channel
Daves Chilled Hold Plays
@chilledholdplays
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
66subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002198204118 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chilledholdplays |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chilledholdplays |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 66 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 65 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 66 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 66 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
80 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 32 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 11.3% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 11.3% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 7.50% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 5.00% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 5.00% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 5.00% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 5.00% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.75% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 3.75% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 2.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2024 to 14 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
$KFT ON $TARA 2K MC https://t.me/tarakft https://fomo.biz/token/0xCf6B68759a5a65ae22c725a7734Fd21921C60089 Only 100 tokens
❤2
YOU HAVE TO LOVE $TARA MEME CHARTS
🔥4
Buy link : https://fomo.biz/token/0x5ac795Bc4E628577E0a2453cdcB21895aD1947b5 Ca : 0x5ac795Bc4E628577E0a2453cdcB21895aD1947b5 Tg : @puwifhat
🔥1
$STICE ON $TARA 14K MC 0x40731c0b5b87dbe5d4ce6c4d664da943289f46b2 https://www.geckoterminal.com/taraxa/pools/0x70d50669d08cf99dd8b1eeb6f4e518316104111c https://fomo.biz/dex/swap?inputCurrency=0x40731C0B5b87DBE5D4Ce6C4d664DA943289f46B2&outputCurrency=TARA
$SNAPPS ON $TARA 13K MC 0xF4275d8f8AA7CD73D594626C3308Cc8cfEd2938a https://t.me/schnapps_tara https://fomo.biz/token/0xF4275d8f8AA7CD73D594626C3308Cc8cfEd2938a https://www.geckoterminal.com/taraxa/pools/0xc01ad2bacac61cfdf7813f826de86a7ff28b572f
👀3🔥3🤯3
3x today
🤯3🔥1
THERES A NEW GUY ON THE BLOCK. $NEWGUY ON $TARA https://www.geckoterminal.com/taraxa/pools/0x8dbc01aa2a3ef01abb3309548b9be044ae36e96f https://t.me/newguytara 0x0D437E6681901ED7110E8298b045af73CF82a784 FIRST AI AGENT ON $TARA. TEAM IS BUILDING DAILLY. HAVE THEIR OWN BUY BOT. CURRENTLY 20K MC. THESE MEMES WILL TAKE OFF. LAUNCHED ON WWW.FOMO.BIZ
🔥3🥰3🏆2
$BTR ON $TARA 100 tokens with 17% burnt https://fomo.biz/token/0xf9BA22c56c04040115224c8048C21406fc8Ac1a7 Find more tokens sending from www.fomo.biz $TARA WILL BE THE $SOL KILLER 0xf9BA22c56c04040115224c8048C21406fc8Ac1a7 https://www.geckoterminal.com/taraxa/pools/0x5394ec36ef1402a9add019a616738a34270e86b5 https://t.me/BITRA_CTO
⚡2🔥2👀1
www.fomo.biz https://t.me/fomodotbiz Come join the meme season on $TARA
❤2👀1👏1
How's everyone doing? Is anyone trading on taraxa.fun? Could be big! Get in whilst it's early.
👌4
WHOS USING STORM RIGHT NOW. https://app.storm.tg/?t=6692738597
🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chilledholdplays. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ROUND (5) - VOTE FOR YOUR COMMUNITY.🗳️ WE WILL INVEST 100K$ TO WINNER & 1 WEEK FREE PROMOTION. EVERY COMMUNITY ARE REQUEST TO PIN OUR POLL.📌 VALID FOR 24 HOURS.⏳
- SciNet2%
- CULT5%
- Wise Monkey2%
- Just a chill girl14%
- Lemons Of Sui4%
- RPG GLOBAL1%
- Croissant CTO11%
- SolyCat5%
- Isaac CTO6%
- TeleSwap Community50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2024 to 14 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@chilledholdplays named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daves Chilled Hold Plays” (@chilledholdplays), 66 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chilledholdplays.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.